Evaluation of the influence of inlet boundary conditions on computational fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms: A virtual experiment

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1531-1539

  Pereira, V M ^a   Brina, O ^a   Marcos Gonzales, A ^a   Narata, A P ^a   Bijlenga, P ^a   Schaller, K ^a   Lovblad, K O ^a   Ouared, R ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Boundary conditions; CFD; Hemodynamic; Intracranial aneurysm; Plug flow solution; Womersley solution

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DYNAMIC PRESSURES; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; PLUG FLOW; SENSIBILITY ANALYSIS; SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES; VIRTUAL EXPERIMENTS; WOMERSLEY;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; WAKES;

HEMODYNAMICS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CAROTID OPHTHALMIC ANEURYSM; CASE REPORT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INLET BOUNDARY CONDITION; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; OSCILLATING SHEAR STRESS INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; RELIABILITY; SENSIBILITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 84878011096     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Augsburger L., Reymond P., Fonck E., Kulcsar Z., Farhat M., Ohta M., Stergiopulos N., Rüfenacht D.A. Methodologies to assess blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: current state and perspectives. Journal of Neuroradiology 2009, 36:270-277.
2. Bonnefous O., Pereira V.M., Ouared R., Brina O., Aerts H., Hermans R., Nijnatten F., Stawiaski J., Ruijters D. Quantification of arterial flow with digital subtracted angiography (DSA). Medical Physics 2012, 39:6264-6275.
3. Castro M.A., Putman C.M., Cebral J.R. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2006, 27:1703-1709.
4. Cebral J.R., Castro M.A., Appanaboyina S., Putman C.M., Millan D., Frangi A.F. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Transactions of Medical Imaging 2005, 24:457-467.
5. Cebral J.R., Castro M.A., Putman C.M., Alperin N. Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiological Measurement 2008, 29:585-594.
6. Cebral J.R., Mut F., Weir J., Putman C.M. Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011, 32:264-270.
7. Cebral J.R., Pergolizzi R.S., Putman C.M. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: qualitative comparison with cerebral angiography. Academic Radiology 2007, 14:804-813.
8. Chien A., Tateshima S., Sayre J., Castro M., Cebral J., Vinuela F. Patient-specific hemodynamic analysis of small internal carotid artery-ophthalmic artery aneurysms. Surgical Neurology 2009, 72:444-450. discussion 450.
9. Hoi Y., Wasserman B.A., Lakatta E.G., Steinman D.A. Effect of common carotid artery inletlengthn normal carotid bifurcation hemodynamics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2010, 132:121.
10. Karmonik C., Yen C., Grossman R.G., Klucznik R., Benndorf G. Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 2009, 151:479-485. discussion 485.
11. Lieber B.B., Hao Q., Seong J., Cesar L. The mixability of angiographic contrast with arterial blood. Medical Physics 2009, 36:5064-5078.
12. Lu G., Huang L., Zhang X.L., Wang S.Z., Hong Y., Hu Z., Geng D.Y. Influence of hemodynamic factors 356 on rupture of intracranial aneurysms: patient-specific 3D mirror aneurysms model 357 computational fluid dynamics simulation. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011, 32:1255-1261.
13. Marzo A., Singh P., Reymond P., Stergiopulos N., Patel U., Hose R. Influence of inlet boundary conditions on the local haemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2009, 12:431-444.
14. Moyle K.R., Antiga L., Steinman D.A. Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow?. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2006, 128:371-379.
15. Mulder G., Bogaerds A.C.B., Rongen P., van de Vosse F.N. The influence of contrast agent injection on physiological flow in the circle of Willis. Medical Engineering and Physics 2011, 33:195-203.
16. Pereira V.M., Bonnefous O., Ouared R., Brina O., Satwiaski J., Aerts H., Ruijters D., Perren F., Bijlenga P., Schaller K., Lovblad K.O. A DSA based method for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow diverter stents using contrast motion estimation. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
17. Radaelli A.G., Augsburger L., Cebral J.R., Ohta M., Rufenacht D.A., Balossino R., Benndorf G., Hose D.R., Marzo A., Metcalfe R., Mortier P., Mut F., Reymond P., Socci L., Verhegghe B., Frangi A.F. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model-a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:2069-2081.
18. Reymond P., Merenda F., Perren F., Rufenacht D., Stergiopulos N. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2009, 297:H208-H222.
19. Steinman D.A. Computational modeling and flow diverters: a teaching moment. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011, 32:981-983.
20. Takao H., Murayama Y., Otsuka S., Qian Y., Mohamed A., Masuda S., Yamamoto M., Abe T. Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012, 43:1436-1439.
21. Taylor, C.A., Steinman, D.A., 2008. Image-based modeling of blood flow and vessel wall dynamics: 327 applications, methods and future directions. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, Pasadena, California.
22. Thomas J.B., Milner J.S., Rutt B.K., Steinman D.A. Reproducibility of image-based computational 340 fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2003, 31:132-141.
23. Venugopal P., Valentino D., Schmitt H., Villablanca J.P., Viñuela F., Duckwiler G. Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. Journal of Neurosurgery 2007, 106:1051-1060.
24. Viceconti, M., Astolfi, L., Leardini, A., Imboden S., Petrone, M., Quadrani, P., Taddei, F., Testi, D., Zannoni, C., 2004.The multimod application framework. In: Proceedings of the Information Visualisation, Eight International Conference.
25. Xiang J., Natarajan S.K., Tremmel M., Ma D., Mocco J., Hopkins L.N., Siddiqui A.H., Levy E.I., Meng H. Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011, 42:144-152.