Health insurance exchanges in Switzerland and the Netherlands offer five key lessons for the operations of US exchanges

Health Affairs

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 744-752

  Van Ginneken, Ewout ^a,b   Swartz, Katherine ^c   Van der Wees, Philip ^d  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN OBSERVATORY ON HEALTH SYSTEMS AND POLICIES   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; NETHERLANDS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SWITZERLAND; UNITED STATES;

COST CONTROL; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGES; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RISK ADJUSTMENT; SWITZERLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84877997461     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0948     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Van de Ven WP, Beck K, Van de Voorde C, Wasem J, Zmora I. Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later. Health Policy. 2007;83(2-3):162-79.
2. Szalay T, Pazitný P, Szalayová A, Frisová S, Morvay K, Petrovic M, et al. Slovakia health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(2): v-xxiii, 1-174.
3. Van Ginneken E, Swartz K. Implementing insurance exchanges- lessons from Europe. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(8):691-3.
4. Leu RE, Rutten FFH, Brouwer W, Matter P, Rütchi C. The Swiss and Dutch health insurance systems: universal coverage and regulated competitive insurance markets. New York (NY): Commonwealth Fund; 2009 Jan. (Pub. No. 1220).
5. Enthoven AC, van de Ven WPMM. Going Dutch-managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(24):2421-3.
6. Reinhardt UE. The Swiss health system: regulated competition without managed care. JAMA. 2004; 292(10):1227-31.
7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, World Health Organization. OECD reviews of health systems: Switzerland 2011 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011 Oct 17.
8. In 2007 about 30 percent of adults were estimated to hold supplemental policies that could be used for private or semiprivate inpatient rooms. The higher estimate of almost 90 percent is based on a different definition of supplemental insurance, including policies that cover services not included in the basic health plan (such as dental care) and-importantly-cash benefits if a person has to miss work (see Note 7).
9. Frank RG, Lamiraud K. Choice, price competition, and complexity in markets for health insurance. J Econ Behav Organ. 2009;71:550-62.
10. Kreier R, Zweifel P. Health insurance in Switzerland: a closer look at a system often offered as a model for the United States. Hofstra Law Rev. 2010;39(1):89-110.
11. Vektis. Zorgthermometer: verzekerden in beweging [Carethermometer: insured individuals on the move]. Zeist (The Netherlands): Vektis; 2012 [cited 2013 Mar 4]. Dutch. Available from: http://www.vektis.nl/downloads/Publicaties/2012/Zorgthermometer%20-%20Verzekerden%20in%20beweging/
12. Roos AF, Schut FT. Spillover effects of supplementary on basic health insurance: evidence from the Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13:51-62.
13. Commissie Evaluatie Risicoverevening Zvw. Evaluatie risicoverevening Zorgverzekeringswet [Evaluation of risk adjustment in the Health Insurance Act]. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport; 2012. Dutch. [cited 2012 Dec 15]. Available for download from: http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2012/06/07/evaluatierisicovereveningzorgverzekeringswet.html
14. Switzerland's original risk equalization formula used only sex and age groups; in 2012 hospitalization lasting more than three days in the previous year was added as a third risk-equalization factor. Insurers with more covered lives in the lowerrisk groups (young males) pay money to the risk-equalization pool, and insurers with more covered lives in the higher-risk groups (adults over age 55 and adults with hospitalizations) receive funds from the pool. Equalization is done at the cantonal level and involves a simple redistribution of monies; no other funds are involved.
15. Beck K, Trottmann M, Zweifel P. Risk adjustment in health insurance and its long-term effectiveness. J Health Econ. 2010;29(4):489-98.
16. Hammer S, Peter M, Trageser J. Wettbewerb im Gesundheitswesen: Auslegeordnung: Schlussbericht [Competition in health care: review: final report] [Internet]. Neuchâtel (Switzerland): Swiss Health Observatory; 2008 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 15]. German. Available from: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/14/22/publ.Document.113392.pdf
17. Van de Ven WPMM, Schut FT, Hermans HEGM, de Jong JD, van der Maat M, Coppen R, et al. Evaluatie Zorgverzekeringswet en Wet op de zorgtoeslag [Evaluation of the Health Insurance act and Care Allowance Act]. The Hague: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; 2009. Dutch.
18. Paolucci F, Schut E, Beck K, Gress S, Van de Voorde C, Zmora I. Supplementary health insurance as a tool for risk-selection in mandatory basic health insurance markets. Health Econ Policy Law. 2007; 2(Pt 2):173-92.
19. Crivelli L. Swiss are back to (quasi-) universal coverage. Health Policy Monitor [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Apr [cited 2013 Mar 4]. Available from: http://hpm.org/ch/a15/1.pdf
20. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Statline: onverzekerden tegen ziektekosten; leeftijd, geslacht, 2006- 2010 [Statline: uninsured for health costs; age, gender, 2006-2010] [Internet]. The Hague: The Bureau; 2013; [cited 2013 Mar 4]. Dutch. Available from: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=71433ned&D1=a&D2=0&D3=a&D4=a&HD=080513-1429&HDR=T,G3&STB=G1,G2
21. Smit J, Bronsveld-de Groot M. Number of people without medical insurance coverage stable. Statistics Netherlands Web magazine [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Apr 1 [cited 2013 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/gezondheid-welzijn/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2010/2010-3087-wm.htm
22. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Statline: Zorgverzekeringswet; wanbetalers met een zorgtoeslag 2006-2009 [Health insurance act; defaulters with care allowance 2006-2009] [Internet] The Hague: The Bureau; 2012 Apr 26 [cited 2012 Dec 15]. Dutch. Available from: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=81080ned&D1=0-2&D2=a&D3=a&VW=T
23. Aarden E, Van Hoyweghen I. Lessons from the Netherlands for the health and social care bill. Lancet. 2011; 377(9779):1745.
24. Bal R, Zuiderent-Jerak T. The practice of markets in Dutch health care: are we drinking from the same glass? Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(1): 139-45.
25. Visser J. Slotervaart versus Achmea: uiteindelijk gaat het om de vraag wie de macht heeft [Slotervaart versus Achmea: bottom line is about who's got the power]. Med Contact. 2013;86(6):362-3. Dutch.
26. Sinaiko AD, Eastman D, Rosenthal MB. How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(3):602-11.
27. Maarse H, Paulus A. The politics of health-care reform in the Netherlands since 2006. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(1):125-34.