Assessing the best-order for business process model refactoring

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1397-1402

  Fernández Ropero, María ^a   Pérez Castillo, Ricardo ^a   Cruz Lemus, José A ^a   Piattini, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Business process model; Case study; Modifiability; Refactoring; Understandability

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; COMMUTATIVE PROPERTY; CRITICAL ACTIVITIES; MODIFIABILITY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REFACTORINGS; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

QUALITY ASSURANCE; RESEARCH; REVERSE ENGINEERING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84877994649     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2480362.2480625     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Weske, M., Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. 2007, Leipzig, Germany.
2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., A.H.M.T. Hofstede, and M. Weske, Business process management: a survey, in Business process management. 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. p. 1-12.
3. Fernández-Ropero, M., et al., Quality-Driven Business Process Refactoring, in International Conference on Business Information Systems (ICBIS 2012). 2012: Paris, France. p. 960-966.
4. Fernández-Ropero, M., R. Pérez-Castillo, and M. Piattini, Refactoring Business Process Models: A Systematic Review, in 7th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering: Wroclaw, Poland, p. 140-145.
5. Weber, B., et al., Survey paper: Refactoring large process model repositories. Comput. Ind., 2011. 62(5): p. 467-486.
6. Dijkman, R., M.L. Rosa, and H.A. Reijers, Managing large collections of business process models-Current techniques and challenges. Computers in Industry, 2012. 63(2): p. 91.
7. Dijkman, R., et al., Identifying refactoring opportunities in process model repositories. Information and Software Technology, 2011.
8. La Rosa, M., et al., Managing process model complexity via abstract syntax modifications. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, 2011. 7(4): p. 614-629.
9. Leopold, H., S. Smirnov, and J. Mendling, Refactoring of process model activity labels, in Proceedings of the Natural language processing and information systems, UK. p. 268-276.
10. Gambini, M., et al., Automated error correction of business process models. Business Process Management, 2011: p. 148-165.
11. OMG Business Process Modeling Notation Specification 2.0. 2011; Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF/.
12. Alarcos Research Group. IBUPROFEN. 2012; Available from: http://marketplace.eclipse.org/node/423052.
13. Pérez-Castillo, R., et al., Generating Event Logs from Non-Process-Aware Systems Enabling Business Process Mining. Enterprise Information System Journal, 2011. 5(3): p. 301-335.
14. Zou, Y. and M. Hung, An Approach for Extracting Workflows from E-Commerce Applications, in International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2006, IEEE Computer Society. p. 127-136.
15. Mendling, J., H.A. Reijers, and W.M.P. van der Aalst, Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Information and Software Technology, 2010. 52(2): p. 127-136.
16. Runeson, P. and M. Höst, Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng., 2009. 14(2): p. 131-164.
17. Yin, R.K., Case study research. Design and methods. 3rd ed. 2003, London: Sage.
18. Eckerson, W., Three Tier Client/Server Architecture: Achieving Scalability, Performance and Efficiency in Client Server Applications. Open Information Systems, 1995. 10(1): p. 3.
19. Pérez-Castillo, R., et al., MARBLE. A Business Process Archeology Tool, in 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2011). 2011: Williamsburg, VI. p. 578 - 581
20. Cardoso, J. Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation. 2006: IEEE.
21. Rolon, E., et al. Prediction models for BPMN usability and maintainability. 2009: IEEE.
22. Sánchez-González, L., et al., Quality assessment of business process models based on thresholds. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2010, 2010: p. 78-95.
23. Reijers, H.A. and J. Mendling, A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 2011(99): p. 1-14.
24. Mendling, J. and M. Strembeck. Influence factors of understanding business process models. 2008: Springer.