Current perspectives and emerging issues on cancer rehabilitation

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue SUPPL11, 2013, Pages 2170-2178

  Stubblefield, Michael D ^a   Hubbard, Gill ^b   Cheville, Andrea ^c   Koch, Uwe ^d   Schmitz, Kathryn H ^e   Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg ^f  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

cancer; exercise; rehabilitation; survivor

Indexed keywords

CANCER CENTER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REHABILITATION; CANCER SURVIVOR; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXERCISE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EUROPE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; REHABILITATION; SURVIVORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84877981028     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28059     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML,. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103: 117-128.
2. Mehnert A, Koch U,. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation: a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013; 39: 76-87.
3. Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47: 2493-2511.
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). GLOBOCAN Fact Sheet. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/cancers/all.asp. [Accessed March 12, 2013].
5. Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M, et al. Survival for 8 major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8: 773-783.
6. Maher J, McConnell H,. New pathways of care for cancer survivors: adding the numbers. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105 (suppl 1): S5-S10.
7. Hellbom M, Bergelt C, Bergenmar M, et al. Cancer rehabilitation: a Nordic and European perspective. Acta Oncol. 2011; 50: 179-186.
8. Dalton SO, Hansen HP, Johansen C, et al. Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer-A Medical Technology Assessment [in Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Board of Health, Monitoring and Medical Technology Assessment; 2010.
9. National Cancer Action Team (NCAT). Cancer and Palliative Care Rehabilitation Workforce Project: A Review of the Evidence. London, United Kingdom: NCAT; 2009.
10. Armes J, Crowe M, Colbourne L, et al. Patients' supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6172-6179.
11. Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrom LH, Groenvold M,. Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study "The Cancer Patient's World" Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20: 1089-1100.
12. Holm LV, Hansen DG, Johansen C, et al. Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20: 2913-2924.
13. Gonzalez CA,. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9: 124-126.
14. Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Marchesi F, Capocaccia R,. EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 931-991.
15. Poppelreuter M, Weis J, Mumm A, Orth HB, Bartsch HH,. Rehabilitation of therapy-related cognitive deficits in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008; 41: 79-90.
16. Alfano CM, Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Hahn EE,. Cancer survivorship and cancer rehabilitation: revitalizing the link. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 904-906.
17. Stubblefield MD,. Commentary on "oncologists' and physiatrists' attitudes regarding rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer." PM R. 2012; 4: 109-110.
18. American College of Surgeons. Commission on Cancer (COC) Accreditation Program. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2012.
19. Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH,. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4: 87-100.
20. Oldervoll L, Kaasa S, Hjermstad M, Lund JA, Loge JH,. Physical exercise results in the improved subjective well-being of a few or is effective rehabilitation for all cancer patients? Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40: 951-962.
21. Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 1409-1426.
22. Hewitt M GS, Stovall E,. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
23. Cheville AL, Troxel AB, Basford JR, Kornblith AB,. Prevalence and treatment patterns of physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2621-2629.
24. Lehmann JF, DeLisa JA, Warren CG, deLateur BJ, Bryant PL, Nicholson CG,. Cancer rehabilitation: assessment of need, development, and evaluation of a model of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978; 59: 410-419.
25. Guadagnoli E, Mor V,. Daily living needs of cancer outpatients. J Commun Health. 1991; 16: 37-47.
26. Freedson P, Bowles HR, Troiano R, Haskell W,. Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: S1-S4.
27. Bassett DR Jr, Rowlands A, Trost SG,. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44 (1 suppl 1): S32-S38.
28. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 1179-1194.
29. Garcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB, et al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 5106-5112.
30. Haley SM, Ni P, Hambleton RK, Slavin MD, Jette AM,. Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 1174-1182.
31. Jette AM, Haley SM, Ni P, Moed R,. Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87: 842-852.
32. Thomas ML,. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Assessment. 2011; 18: 291-307.
33. Jette AM, Haley SM, Tao W, et al. Prospective evaluation of the AM-PAC-CAT in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 385-398.
34. Cheville A, Yost K, Larson D, et al. Performance of an item response theory-based computer adaptive test in identifying functional decline. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1153-1160.
35. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000; 55: M221-M231.
36. Vasunilashorn S, Coppin AK, Patel KV, et al. Use of the Short Physical Performance Battery Score to predict loss of ability to walk 400 meters: analysis from the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009; 64: 223-229.
37. Klepin HD, Geiger AM, Tooze JA, et al. The feasibility of inpatient geriatric assessment for older adults receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 1837-1846.
38. Barthelemy P, Heitz D, Mathelin C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with early breast cancer. Impact of age and comprehensive geriatric assessment on tumor board proposals. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011; 79: 196-204.
39. Stout NL, Binkley JM, Schmitz KH, et al. A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2012; 118: 2191-2200.
40. Cheville A, Kornblith A, Basford J,. An examination of the causes for the underutilization of rehabilitation services among people with advanced cancer. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90 (5 suppl 1): S27-S37.
41. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM,. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38: 1-14.
42. Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, O'Brien PJ, Nelson L, Skelly J,. Swelling, numbness, pain, and their relationship to arm function among breast cancer survivors: a disablement process model perspective. Breast J. 2002; 8: 338-348.
43. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 2 ed. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2001.
44. Aebi S, Davidson T, Gruber G, Cardoso F,. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22 (suppl 6): vi12-vi24.
45. Stubblefield MD, O'Dell MW,. Cancer Rehabilitation Principles and Practice. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2009.
46. Stubblefield MD, Burstein HJ, Burton AW, et al. NCCN Task Force Report: management of neuropathy in cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Network. 2009; 7: S1-S26.
47. Stubblefield MD,. Radiation fibrosis syndrome: neuromuscular and musculoskeletal complications in cancer survivors. PM R. 2011; 3: 1041-1054.