Classification of dissimilarity data via sparse representation

ICPRAM 2013 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 194-199

  Theodorakopoulos, Ilias ^a   Economou, George ^a   Fotopoulos, Spiros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Classification; Dissimilarity representation; Dissimilarity space; Non euclidean data; Sparse representation

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; DISCRIMINATIVE INFORMATIONS; DISSIMILARITY REPRESENTATIONS; DISSIMILARITY SPACE; MATHEMATICAL PROPERTIES; NON-EUCLIDEAN; SPARSE REPRESENTATION;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84877980733     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Cox, T. F., Cox, M. A. A., 2001. Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman & Hall, Londo.
2. Donoho D. L., Huo X., 2001. Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 47:2845-2862.
3. Duin, R. P. W., Pekalska, E., 2010. Non-Euclidean Dissimilarities: Causes and Informativeness. SSPR & SPR LNCS, 324-333.
4. Fotopoulou, F, Theodorakopoulos, I., Economou, G., 2011. Fusion in Phase Space for Shape Re-trieval. EUSIPCO.
5. Fotopoulou, F., Laskaris, N., Economou, G., Fotopoulos, S., 2011. Advanced Leaf Image Retrieval via Multidimensional Embedding Sequence Similarity (MESS) Method. Pattern Analysis and Applications.
6. Goldfarb, L., 1984. A unified approach to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition 17, 575-582.
7. Laub, J., Roth, V., Buhmannb, J. M., Müller, K. R., 2006. On the information and representation of non-Euclidean pairwise data. Pattern Recognition, 1815-182639.
8. Lichtenauer, J., Hendriks, E.A., Reinders, M.J.T., 2008. Sign Language Recognition by Combining Statistical DTW and Independent Classification. PAMI 30, 2040-2046.
9. Olshausen, B. A., Field, D.J., 2004. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14, 481-487.
10. Pekalska, E., Duin, R. P. W., Paclik, P., 2006. Prototype selection for dissimilarity-based classifiers. Pattern Recognition 39(2), 189-208.
11. Pekalska, E., Duin, R. P. W., 2005. The dissimilarity representation for pattern recognition. World Scientific.
12. Pekalska, E., Harol, A., Duin, R., Spillman, B., Bunke, H., 2006. Non-Euclidean or Non-Metric Measures Can Be Informative. SSPR.
13. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Müller, K. R.: Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation 10, 1299-1319 (1998).
14. Torgerson, W. S., 1952. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 17, 401-419.
15. Wilson, R, Hancock, E., 2010. Spherical embedding and classification. SSPR.
16. Wright, J., Yang, A. Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., Ma, Y., 2009. Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation. PAMI 31, 210-227.
17. Wright, J., Ma, Y., Mairal, J., Sapiro, G., Huang, T. S., Shuicheng, Y., 2010. Sparse Represen-tation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 98(6), 1031 - 1044.
18. Xu, W., Wilson, R.C., Hancock E.R., 2011. Determining the Cause of Negative Dissimilarity Ei-genvalues. In: CAIP.
19. Zhag, L., Yang, M., Feng, X., 2011. Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?. ICCV.
20. Zhu, S. C., Shi, K., Si, Z., 2010. Learning explicit and implicit visual manifolds by information projection. Pattern Recognition Letters 31, 667-685.