Information technology, productivity, and asset ownership: Evidence from taxicab fleets

Organization Science

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 831-845

  Rawley, Evan ^a   Simcoe, Timothy S ^b  

^a Columbia Business School ^*  (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asset ownership; Capabilities; Information technology; Productivity; Vertical integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877970239     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0758     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643-1657.
2. Autor D, Dorn D (2012) Inequality and specialization: The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. NBER Working Paper 15150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
3. Baker GP, Hubbard TN (2004) Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in U.S. trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1443-1479.
4. Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2009) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. NBER Working Paper 14975, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339-376.
6. Brynjolfsson E (1994) Information assets, technology and organization. Management Sci. 40(12):1645-1662.
7. Bruno R (2010) Driven into poverty: A comprehensive study of the Chicago taxicab industry. Working paper, University of Illinois, Chicago.
8. Card D, DiNardo J (2006) The impact of technological change on low-wage workers: A review. Blank RM, Danziger SH, Schoeni RF, eds. Working and Poor: How Economic and Policy Changes Are Affecting Low-Wage Workers (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 113-140.
9. Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386-405.
10. Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):141-161.
11. Gallaugher JM (2008) Zara case: Fast fashion from savvy systems. Case study, Boston College, Boston. http://www.gallaugher.com/Zara%20Case.pdf.
12. Gilbert G, Nalevanko A, Stone JR (1993) Computer dispatch and scheduling in the taxi and paratransit industries: An application of advanced public transportation systems. Working paper, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
13. Gilbert G, Cook TJ, Nalevanko A, Everett-Lee L (2002) The role of the private-for-hire vehicle industry in public transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 75, Transportation Research Board/National Research Council, Washington, DC.
14. Grossman S, Hart O (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691-719.
15. Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51-78.
16. Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119-1158.
17. Imbens G (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):4-29.
18. Jacobides MG, Hitt LM (2005) Losing sight of the forest for the trees? Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1209-1227.
19. Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395-413.
20. Lafontaine F, Slade M (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):629-685.
21. Langlois R (1992) Transaction cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99-127.
22. Levinthal D, Wu X (2010) Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780-801.
23. Macher JT, Richman BD (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1):1-63.
24. Mahr F, Kretschmer T (2010) Complementarities between personal computing and organizational structure: The role of corporate exploration and exploitation. Working paper, Ludwig Maximillians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
25. Nickerson JA, Silverman BS (2003) Why aren't all truck drivers owner-operators? Asset ownership and the employment relation in interstate for-hire trucking. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):91-118.
26. Rawley E, Simcoe T (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 57(11):1963-1978.
27. Rochlin GI (1997) Trapped in the Net: The Unanticipated Consequences of Computerization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
28. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41-55.
29. Schaller B, Gilbert G (1995) Factors of production in a regulated industry: New York taxi drivers and the price for better service. Transportation Quart. 49(4):81-91.
30. Taxicab, Limousine, and Paratransit Association (1992-1997a) TLPA Limousine and Sedan Fact Book (International Taxicab Association, Kensington, MD).
31. Taxicab, Limousine, and Paratransit Association (1992-1997b) TLPA Taxicab Fact Book (International Taxicab Association, Kensington, MD).
32. Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).
33. Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).
34. Woollett K, Spiers HJ, Maguire EA (2009) Talent in the taxi: A model system for exploring expertise. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 364(1522):1407-1416.