MANAGING PERFORMANCE IN A CONTEXT OF POLITICAL CLIENTELISM: THE CASE OF THAILAND

Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 18, Issue , 2009, Pages 279-306

  Punyaratabandhu, Suchitra ^a   Unger, Daniel H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877964429     PISSN: 07321317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0732-1317(2009)0000018013     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Master Plan for Public Sector Reform, 1997–2001.
2. Barzeley, M. (2006). Intelligent administration: Productivity, transparency and management of change. International Public Management Review, 7(1), 6–12.
3. Charoenwongsawad, K. (2004). Kolamed ded corruption (In Thai). Bangkok: Success Media.
4. Commission on Growth and Development. (2008). The growth report, strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Conference Edition. World Bank, Washington, DC.
5. della Porta, D. (2000). Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption. In: S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds), Disaffected democrats, what’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Geddes, B. (1991). A game theoretical model of reform in Latin American democracies. American Political Science Review, 85, 371–392.
7. Heinrich, C. J., Hill, C. J., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2004). Governance as an organizing theme for empirical research. In: P. W. Ingraham & L. E. Lynn, Jr. (Eds), The art of governance. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2006). Introduction. In: G. Helmke & S. Levitsky (Eds), Informal institutions and democracy, lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
9. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The balanced scorecard. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Country data report for Thailand. World Bank Report, Governance Matters: Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996–2006. Available at: http://infor.worldbank.org/governance/wgi2007/sc_chart.asp
11. Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen-politician linkages: and introduction. In: H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds), Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Laothammathas, A. (1995). Song nakara prachatipathai (In Thai). Bangkok: Matichon Press.
13. Lyne, M. M. (2008). The voter’s dilemma and democratic accountability: Explaining the democracy-development paradox. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
14. Neher, C. D., & Bowornwathana, B. (1986). Thai and western studies of politics in Thailand. Asian Thought and Society: An International Review, XI(31), 16–27.
15. Nelson, M. H. (2007). Institutional incentives and informal local political groups Phuak in Thailand: Comments on Allen Hicken and Paul Chambers. Journal of East Asian Studies, 7, 125–147.
16. Office of the Civil Service Commission. (2003). Manual on performance evaluation (In Thai). Bangkok: Office of the Civil Service Commission Printing House.
17. Office of the Committee on Administrative Reform, Office of the Civil Service Commission. (1997). Reform of the civil service: Public sector reform plan (In Thai). Bangkok: Office of the Civil Service Commission Printing House.
18. Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2003). Strategic plan for public sector development (In Thai). Bangkok: Office of the Public Sector Development Commission Printing House.
19. Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2006). Manual for performance evaluation according to agreements made by departmental level agencies in the fiscal year 2006. In Thai. Available at: http://www.opdc.go.th/content.php?menu_id ¼ 4&content_id ¼ 107
20. Roniger, L. (2004). Political clientelism, democracy, and market economy. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 353–375.
21. Samakarn, S. (2004). Naew Kid Peua Kan Seuksa Panha Sangkom Thai Lae Naew Tarng Kae Kai (in Thai). NIDA Research Papers. National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok.
22. Schedler, K., & Proeller, I. (2007). Public management as a cultural phenomenon: Revitalizing societal culture in international public management research. International Public Management Review, 8(1), 186–195.
23. Stokes, S. C. (2006). Do informal rules make democracy work? Accounting for accountability in argentina. In: G. Helmke & S. Levitsky (Eds), Informal institutions and democracy, lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.