Designing for the living room: Long-term user involvement in a Living Lab

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1539-1548

  Ogonowski, Corinna ^a   Ley, Benedikt ^a   Hess, Jan ^a   Wan, Lin ^a   Wulf, Volker ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Domestic domain; Living Lab; Long term user study; Participatory design

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; DOMESTIC DOMAIN; HOME ENTERTAINMENT; LIVING LAB; LONG-TERM USER STUDIES; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE; TRUST RELATIONSHIP;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84877955733     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Almirall, E. Living Labs and Open innovation: Roles and Applicability. eJOV 10, 3 (2008), 21-46.
2. Bannon, L.J., Schmidt, K., and Wagner, I. Lest We Forget - The European Field Study Tradition and the Issue of Conditions of Work in CSCW Research. Proc. of ECSCW '11, (2011), 213-232.
3. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., and Ståhlbröst, A. Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. Proc. of HICSS '09, IEEE (2009), 1-10.
4. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. and Larsson, S. A Case Study of Real-World Testing. Proc. of MUM '08, ACM (2008), 113-116.
5. Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., Weiss, A., Beck, E., and Tscheligi, M. Trends in the Living Room and Beyond. CIE 6, 1 (2008), 5:1-5:23.
6. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. The MIT Press, 2004.
7. Crabtree, A. and Rodden, T. Domestic Routines and Design for the Home. JCSCW 13, 2 (2004), 191-220.
8. Ehn, P. Participation in Design Things. Proc. of PDC '08, ACM (2008), 92-101.
9. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., and Hribernik, K.A. Living Labs as a Multi-Contextual R&D Methodology. Proc. of ICE '06, (2006).
10. Følstad, A. Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. eJOV 10, August (2008), 99-131.
11. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21-29.
12. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
13. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. CRC Press, 1991.
14. Harboe, G., Metcalf, C.J., Bentley, F., Tullio, J., Massey, N., and Romano, G. Ambient Social TV: Drawing People into a Shared Experience. Proc. of CHI '08, ACM (2008), 1-10.
15. Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Reichling, T., Wan, L., and Wulf, V. New Technology@Home: Impacts on Usage Behavior and Social Structures. Proc. of EuroITV '12, ACM (2012), 185-194.
16. Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Wan, L., and Wulf, V. Jumping between Devices and Services: Towards an Integrated Concept for Social TV. Proc. of EuroITV '11, ACM (2011), 11-20.
17. Hess, J., Wan, L., Ley, B., and Wulf, V. In-situ Everywhere: A Feedback Infrastructure for Cross Platform Home-IT. Proc. of EuroITV '12, ACM (2012), 75-78.
18. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., et al. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. Proc. of CHI '03, ACM (2003), 17-24.
19. Intille, S.S., Larson, K., Beaudin, J.S., Nawyn, J., Munguia Tapia, E., and Kaushik, P. A Living Laboratory for the Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Computing Technologies. Proc. CHI '05, ACM (2005), 1941-1944.
20. Kanstrup, A.M. Living Lab Skagen 2008. Danish HCI Research Symp. '08, (2008), 59-62.
21. Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. JCSCW 7, 3-4 (1998), 167-185.
22. Lievens, B., Milić-Frayling, N., Lerouge, V., et al. Managing Social Adoption and Technology Adaption in Longitudinal Studies of Mobile Media Applications. Proc. of MUM '10, ACM (2010).
23. Lindquist, S., Westerlund, B., Sundblad, Y., Tobiasson, H., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W. Codesigning Communication Technology with and for Families - Methods, Experience, Results and Impact. In N. Streitz, A. Kameas and I. Mavrommati, eds., The Disappearing Computer. Springer, 2007, 99-119.
24. Muller, M.J. and Kuhn, S. Participatory design. CACM 36, 6 (1993), 24-28.
25. Mulvenna, M., Martin, S., McDade, D., Beamish, E., De Oliveira, A., and Kivilehto, A. TRAIL Living Labs Survey: A Survey of the ENOLL Living Labs. University of Ulster, 2011.
26. Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., and Hribernik, K.A. State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Proc. of ICE '06, (2006).
27. Obrist, M., Bernhaupt, R., and Tscheligi, M. Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users' Requirements and Experiences. IJHCI 24, 2 (2008), 174-196.
28. O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., and Hughes, J. At Home with the Technology: An Ethnographic Study of a Set-Top-Box Trial. ToCHI 6, 3 (1999), 282-308.
29. Randall, D., Harper, R., and Rouncefield, M. Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. Springer, 2007.
30. De Ruyter, B. and Aarts, E. Ambient Intelligence: visualizing the future. Proc. of AVI '04, ACM (2004), 203-208.
31. Schaffers, H., Cordoba, M., Hongisto, P., Kallai, T., Merz, C., and Van Rensburg, J. Exploring Business Models for Open Innovation in Rural Living Labs. Proc. of ICE '07, (2007).
32. Schuurman, D., Evens, T., and De Marez, L. A Living Lab Research Approach for Mobile TV. Proc. of EuroITV '09, ACM (2009), 189-196.
33. Schuurman, D., De Moor, K., De Marez, L., and Evens, T. Investigating User Typologies and Their Relevance within a Living Lab-Research Approach for ICT-Innovation. Proc. of HICSS '10, IEEE (2010), 1-10.
34. Sleeswijk Visser, F. and Visser, V. Re-using users: cocreate and co-evaluate. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2-3 (2006), 148-152.
35. Ståhlbröst, A. Exploring the Testbed Field. Proc. of IS Research Seminars Scandinavia, (2004).
36. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., and Hill, A. Bringing the television experience to other media in the home. Proc. of EuroITV '09, ACM (2009), 201-210.