A group signature scheme with unbounded message-dependent opening

ASIA CCS 2013 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSAC Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 517-522

  Ohara, Kazuma ^a,b   Sakai, Yusuke ^a,b   Emura, Keita ^c   Hanaoka, Goichiro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

group signature; random oracle model; unbounded message dependent opening

Indexed keywords

BUILDING BLOCKES; EFFICIENT CONSTRUCTION; GROUP SIGNATURE SCHEME; GROUP SIGNATURES; IDENTITY BASED ENCRYPTION; PROBLEMATIC MESSAGES; RANDOM ORACLE MODEL; UNBOUNDED MESSAGE-DEPENDENT OPENING;

CRYPTOGRAPHY;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 84877950546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2484313.2484382     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. M. Abe, G. Fuchsbauer, J. Groth, K. Haralambiev, and M. Ohkubo. Structure-preserving signatures and commitments to group elements. In T. Rabin, editor, CRYPTO 2010, volume 6223 of LNCS, pages 209-236. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.
2. M. Abe, K. Haralambiev, and M. Ohkubo. Signing on elements in bilinear groups for modular protocol design. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2010/133, 2010. http://eprint.iacr.org/.
3. M. Abe, K. Haralambiev, and M. Ohkubo. Group to group commitments do not shrink. In D. Pointcheval and T. Johansson, editors, EUROCRYPT 2012, volume 7237 of LNCS, pages 301-317. Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.
4. M. Bellare, D. Micciancio, and B. Warinschi. Foundations of group signatures: Formal definitions, simplified requirements, and a construction based on general assumptions. In E. Biham, editor, EUROCRYPT 2003, volume 2656 of LNCS, pages 644-644. Springer, Heidelberg, 2003.
5. M. Bellare, H. Shi, and C. Zhang. Foundations of group signatures: The case of dynamic groups. In A. Menezes, editor, CT-RSA 2005, volume 3376 of LNCS, pages 136-153. Springer, Heidelberg, 2005.
6. D. Boneh and X. Boyen. Short signatures without random oracles and the SDH assumption in bilinear groups. J. Cryptol., 21:149-177, 2008. (Pubitemid 351653334)
7. D. Boneh, X. Boyen, and H. Shacham. Short group signatures. In M. Franklin, editor, CRYPTO 2004, volume 3152 of LNCS, pages 227-242. Springer, Heidelberg, 2004.
8. D. Boneh and M. Franklin. Identity-based encryption from the Weil pairing. SIAM J. Comput., 32(3):586-615, 2003.
9. D. Chaum and E. van Heyst. Group signatures. In D. W. Davies, editor, EUROCRYPT '91, volume 547 of LNCS, pages 257-265. Springer, Heidelberg, 1991.
10. J. Chen, H. W. Lim, S. Ling, H. Wang, and H. Wee. Shorter IBE and signatures via asymmetric pairings. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2012/224, 2012. http://eprint.iacr.org/.
11. R. Cramer and V. Shoup. A practical public key cryptosystem provably secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. In H. Krawczyk, editor, CRYPTO 1998, volume 1462 of LNCS, pages 13-25. Springer, Heidelberg, 1998.
12. R. Cramer and V. Shoup. Design and analysis of practical public-key encryption schemes secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. SIAM Journal on Computing, 33(1):167-226, 2003.
13. J. Groth and A. Sahai. Efficient non-interactive proof systems for bilinear groups. In N. Smart, editor, EUROCRYPT 2008, volume 4965 of LNCS, pages 415-432. Springer, Heidelberg, 2008.
14. S.-H. Heng and K. Kurosawa. k-resilient identity-based encryption in the standard model. In T. Okamoto, editor, CT-RSA 2004, volume 2964 of LNCS, pages 67-80. Springer, Heidelberg, 2004.
15. Y. Sakai, K. Emura, G. Hanaoka, Y. Kawai, T. Matsuda, and K. Omote. Group signatures with message-dependent opening. In Pairing 2012, pages 270-294, 2012.
16. H. Shacham. A Cramer-Shoup encryption scheme from the linear assumption and from progressively weaker linear variants. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2007/074, 2007. http://eprint.iacr.org/.