Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods

Rural and Remote Health

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Silva, T B ^a   Mauad, E C ^a   Carvalho, A L ^a   Jacobs, L A ^b   Shulman, L N ^c  

^a BARRETOS CANCER HOSPITAL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brazil; Breast cancer; Community health systems; Diagnosis; Screening; Symptoms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAZIL; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; BRAZIL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRIVATE SECTOR; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUBLIC SECTOR; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877949376     PISSN: 14456354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011; 61(2): 69-90.
2. Anderson BO. Understanding social obstacles to early breast cancer detection is critical to improving breast cancer outcome in low-and middle-resource countries. Cancer 2010; 116(19): 4436-4439.
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Coordenação Geral de Ações Estratégicas. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Estimativa 2012: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2011.
4. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 151(10): 727-737, W237-742.
5. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2010; 60(2): 99-119.
6. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, Wang WW, Allison CJ, Chen FL et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002; 94(19): 1445-1457.
7. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000; 92(18): 1490-1499.
8. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2006; 4: CD001877.
9. US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 151(10): 716-726, W-236.
10. Bihrmann K, Jensen A, Olsen AH, Njor S, Schwartz W, Vejborg I et al. Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark. Journal of Medical Screening 2008; 15(1): 23-26.
11. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: cidades. (Online) 2012. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/painelpainel.php?codmun=350550 (Accessed 5 January 2012).
12. Mauad EC, Nicolau SM, Moreira LF, Haikel RL Jr, Longatto-Filho A, Baracat EC. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance. Rural Remote Health 9(3): 1241. (Online) 2009. Available: www.rrh.org.au (Accessed 2 April 2013).
13. Mauad EC, Silva TB, Haikel RL Jr, Bauab S, Longatto-Filho A. Is community intervention in breast cancer screening in Brazil feasible? Journal of Medical Screening 2011; 18(1): 51.
14. Brasil, Governo do Estado de São Paulo. Secretaria da Saúde. DRS V -Barretos. (Online) 2013. Available: http://www.saude.sp.gov.br/ses/institucional/departamentos-regionais-de-saude/drs-vbarretos (Accessed 16 April 2013).
15. Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2009.
16. Marchi AA, Gurgel MS. [Adherence to the opportunistic mammography screening in public and private health systems]. Revista Brasileira de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia 2010; 32(4): 191-197.
17. Puschel K, Coronado G, Soto G, Gonzalez K, Martinez J, Holte S et al. Strategies for increasing mammography screening in primary care in Chile: results of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers Prevention 2010; 19(9): 2254-2261.
18. Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA). Controle do Câncer de Mama -Documento do Consenso. (Online) 2004. Available: http://www.inca.gov.br/publicacoes/Consensointegra.pdf (Accessed 23 February 2009).
19. Presidência da República. Lei n° 11.664, de 29 de abril de 2008. In: Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos (Eds). Brasília: Casa Civil; 2008.
20. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, Broeders MJ, Boer R, Hendriks JH et al. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 2003; 361(9367): 1411-1417.
21. Shapiro S, Coleman EA, Broeders M, Codd M, de Koning H, Fracheboud J et al. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. International Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 27(5): 735-742.
22. Sasieni P. Evaluation of the UK breast screening programmes. Annals of Oncology 2003; 14(8): 1206-1208.
23. Moraes MAFD, Figueiredo MG, Oliveira FCR. Migração de trabalhadores na lavoura canavieira paulista: uma investigação dos impactos sócio-econômicos nas cidades de Pedra Branca, Estado do Ceará, e de Leme, Estado de São Paulo. Revista de Economia Agrícola 2009; 56(2): 21-35.
24. Carvalhaes C. O médico brasileiro: A realidade do médico no Brasil. São Paulo: Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo (CREMESP). (Online) 2005. Available: http://www.cremesp.org.br/?siteAcao=Noticias&id=1077 (Accessed 20 April 2011).
25. Bhosle M, Samuel S, Vosuri V, Paskett E, Balkrishnan R. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2007; 103(1): 53-59.
26. Silcock J, Ratcliffe J. The 1990 GP contract--meeting needs? Health Policy 1996; 36(2): 199-207.
27. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde (CNES). Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde (DATASUS); 2011. Available: http://dab.saude.gov.br/abnumerosphp .
28. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Programa Saúde da Família. Brasília/DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2011. Available: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/saude/cidadao/area.cfm?id_area=149 .
29. Mauad EC, Nicolau SM, Gomes UA, da Costa Vieira RA, de Castro Mattos JS, Longatto-Filho A et al. Can mobile units improve the strategies for cervical cancer prevention? Diagnostic Cytopathology 2010; 38(10): 727-730.
30. Shulman LN, Willett W, Sievers A, Knaul FM. Breast cancer in developing countries: opportunities for improved survival. Journal of Oncology 2010; 1-6.
31. Semiglazov VF, Moiseenko VM, Manikhas AG, Protsenko SA, Kharikova RS, Popova RT et al. [Interim results of a prospective randomized study of self-examination for early detection of breast cancer (Russia/St.Petersburg/WHO)]. Vopr Onkol 1999; 45(3): 265-271.
32. Loh S, Packer TL, Yip CH, Passmore A. Targeting health disparity in breast cancer: insights into women's knowledge of their cancer profile in Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2009; 10(4): 631-636.
33. Lopez-Carrillo L, Suarez-Lopez L, Torres-Sanchez L. [Breast cancer examination in Mexico: summary of the results from the National Survey of Reproductive Health]. Salud Publica Mexico 2009; 51(Suppl 2): s345-349.
34. Rasu RS, Rianon NJ, Shahidullah SM, Faisel AJ, Selwyn BJ. Effect of educational level on knowledge and use of breast cancer screening practices in Bangladeshi women. Health Care Women International 2011; 32(3): 177-189.
35. Tara S, Agrawal CS, Agrawal A. Validating breast self examination as screening modalities for breast cancer in eastern region of Nepal: a population based study. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2008; 6(1): 89-93.
36. Yip CH, Smith RA, Anderson BO, Miller AB, Thomas DB, Ang ES et al. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in lowand middle-income countries: early detection resource allocation. Cancer 2008; 113(8 Suppl): 2244-2256.
37. Martin-Lopez R, Hernandez-Barrera V, De Andres AL, Garrido PC, De Miguel AG, Garcia RJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2010 19(3): 239-245.
38. Ko CM, Sadler GR, Ryujin L, Dong A. Filipina American women's breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. BMC Public Health 2003; 3: 27.
39. Sadler GR, Ko CM, Cohn JA, White M, Weldon RN, Wu P. Breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors among African American women: the Black cosmetologists promoting health program. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 57.
40. Buki LP, Jamison J, Anderson CJ, Cuadra AM. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women. Cancer 2007; 110(7): 1578-1585.
41. Puschel K, Thompson B, Coronado G, Gonzalez K, Rain C, Rivera S. 'If I feel something wrong, then I will get a mammogram': understanding barriers and facilitators for mammography screening among Chilean women. Family Practice 2010; 27(1): 85-92.
42. Rocha SMRd. Pobreza no Brasil: afinal, de que se trata? 3rd edn.Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2007.
43. Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo (FOSP). Acesso ao Banco de Dados -RHC. São Paulo: FOSP, 2011. Available: http://200.144.1.68/cgi-bin/dh?rhc/rhc-geral.def.
44. Autier P, Shannoun F, Scharpantgen A, Lux C, Back C, Severi G et al. A breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: the Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992-1997. International Journal of Cancer 2002; 97(6): 828-832.
45. Deras IL, Aubin SM, Blase A, Day JR, Koo S, Partin AW et al. PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. Journal of Urology 2008; 179(4): 1587-1592.