Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis;Diagnosi precoce e monitoraggio nella sclerosi multipla: Il contributo della risonanza magnetica

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 251-264

  Rocca, M A ^a   Anzalone, N ^a   Falini, A ^a   Filippi, M ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Monitoring; Multiple sclerosis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877929206     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0811-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Schumacher GA (1966) Problems of multiple sclerosis. N Y State J Med 66:1743-1752
2. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L et al (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13:227-231
3. Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF et al (1988) MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology 38:180-185
4. Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S et al (1988) Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology 38:1822-1825
5. Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH et al (1997) Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 120(Pt 11):2059-2069
6. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121-127
7. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol 58:840-846
8. Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M et al (2007) MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 6:677-686
9. Rovira A, Swanton J, Tintore M et al (2009) A single, early magnetic resonance imaging study in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 66:587-592
10. Montalban X, Tintore M, Swanton J et al (2010) MRI criteria for MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 74:427-434
11. Geurts JJ, Pouwels PJ, Uitdehaag BM (2005) Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 236:254-260
12. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Calabrese M et al (2010) Intracortical lesions: relevance for new diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Neurology 75:1988-1994
13. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292-302
14. Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A et al (2009) Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 15:848-853
15. Rio J, Comabella M, Montalban X (2009) Predicting responders to therapies for multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 5:553-560
16. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Arnold DL et al (2006) EFNS guidelines on the use of neuroimaging in the management of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 13:313-325