Construct validation study of the relationship scales questionnaire (RSQ) on an adult sample;La version française du relationship scales questionnaire de bartholomew (RSQ, questionnaire des échelles de relation): Étude de validation du construit

Encephale

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 69-76

  Guedeney N ^a,d   Fermanian, J ^b,d   Bifulco, A ^c  

^a INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

^b HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Universite Paris Sud   (France)

Author keywords

Construct validity; Object attachment; Relationship scales questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELATIONSHIP SCALES QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL CARE; VALIDATION STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBJECT RELATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS;

ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84877929096     PISSN: 00137006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bäckström M, Holmes BM. Measuring adult attachment: a construct validation of two self-report instruments. Scand J Psychol 2001;42:79-86.
2. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles amoung young adults: a test of four categoy -model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;61:226-44.
3. Bartholomew K, Shaver PR. Methods of assessing adult attachment: do they converge. In: Simpson JM, Rholes NS, editors. Adult attachment and close relationships. NY: Guildford Press; 1998. p. 25-45.
4. Becker TE, Billings RS, Eveleth DM, et al. Validity of scores on three attachment style scales: exploratory and confirmatory evidence. Educ Psychol Measurement 1997;57:477-93.
5. Bifulco A, Moran P, Ball C, et al. Adult attachment style: II. Its relationship to psychosocial depressive vulnerability. SPPE 2002;37:60-7.
6. Bifulco A, Mahon J, Kwon JH, et al. The vulnerable attachment style questionnaire (VASQ): an interview based measure of attachment styles that predict depressive disorder. Psychol Med 2003;33:1099-110.
7. Bowlby J. A secure base. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
8. Bowlby J. Attachement et perte. Volume 1, l'attachement. Paris : PUF; 2002. 540 pages.
9. Bowlby J. Attachement and loss. Volume 1, Attachment. 2nd ed. New York:Basic Books;1983.464 pages.
10. Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative review. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS, editors. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press; 1998. p. 46-76.
11. Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, et al. The patient provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:29-35.
12. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;58:644-63.
13. Crowell JA, Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Measurement of individual differences. In: Cassidy J, Shaver P, editors. Handbook of Attachment. NY: Guildford Press; 1999. p. 434-65.
14. Davila J, Cobb RJ. Predictors of change in attachment security during adulthood. In: Rholes WS, Simpson JA, editors. Adult attachment theory: research and clinical implications. NY: Guildford Press; 2004. p. 133-56.
15. Feeney JA, Hohaus L. Attachment and spousal caregiving. Pers Relationships 2001;8:21-39.
16. Griffin D, Bartholomew K. Models of the self and other: fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:430-45.
17. Guédeney N. Apport de la théorie de l'attachement à la relation d'aide. Illustration : étude des liens entre le système d'attachement et l'alliance de travail sur un échantillon de 130 sujets recourrant à une demande d'aide sociale. Thèse de Science; université Paris-6; 2004.
18. Kirckpatrick LA, Hazan C. Attachment styles and close relationships: a four-year prospective study. Pers Relationships 1994;2:229-37.
19. Kurdek LA. On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles. J Soc Pers Rel 2002;19:811-34.
20. Puura K, Davis H, Papadopoulou K, et al. The European early promotion project: a new primary health care service to promote children's mental health. Inf Ment Health J 2002;23:606-24.
21. Scharfe E, Bartholomew K. Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. Pers Relationships 1994;1:23-43.
22. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. Attachment -related psychodynamics. Attach Hum Dev 2002;4:133-61.
23. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. What do self-report attachment measures assess? In: Rholes WS, Simpson JA, editors. Adult attachment: theory, research and clinical implications. NY: Guildford Press; 2004. p. 17-54.
24. Siegert RJ, Ward T, Hudson S. The structure of Romance. N Z J Psychol 1995;24:13-20.
25. Stein H, Koontz AD, Fonagy P, et al. Adult attachment: what are the underlying dimensions? Psychol Psychother 2002;75:77-91.