Core consistency diagnostic in PARAFAC2

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 99-105

  Kamstrup Nielsen, Maja H ^a   Johnsen, Lea G ^a,b   Bro, Rasmus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b CHR HANSEN A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Core consistency; Model complexity; Number of components; PARAFAC2

Indexed keywords

CORE CONSISTENCY; GENERAL TRENDS; MODELING COMPLEXITY; MODELING PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE RESEARCH; NUMBER OF COMPONENTS; PARAFAC2; RESEARCH AREAS; SIMULATED DATASETS; VISUAL INSPECTION;

EID: 84877926249     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2497     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Harshman RA. PARAFAC2: mathematical and technical notes. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1972; 22: 30-44.
2. Kiers HAL, Ten Berge JMF, Bro R. PARAFAC2-part I. A direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC2 model. J. Chemom. 1999; 13: 275-294.
3. Amigo JM, Skov T, Coello J, Maspoch S, Bro R. Solving GC-MS problems with PARAFAC2. Trends Anal. Chem. 2008; 27: 714-725.
4. Matero S, Poutiainen S, Leskinen J, et al. Monitoring the wetting phase of fluidized bed granulation process using multi-way methods: the separation of successful from unsuccessful batches. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2009; 96: 88-93.
5. Robeyst N, Grosse CU, De Belie N. Monitoring fresh concrete by ultrasonic transmission measurements: exploratory multi-way analysis of the spectral information. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2009; 95: 64-73.
6. de Juan A, Tauler R. Comparison of three-way resolution methods for non-trilinear chemical data sets. J. Chemom. 2001; 15: 749-772.
7. ten Berge JMF, Kiers HAL. Some uniqueness results for PARAFAC2. Psychometrika 1996; 61: 123-132.
8. Harshman RA, De Sarbo WS. An application of PARAFAC to a small sample problem, demonstrating preprocessing, orthogonality constraints, and split-half diagnostic techniques. In Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Law HG, Snyder CW, Hattie JA, McDonald RP (eds.). Praeger: New York, 1984; 602-642.
9. Bro R, Kiers HAL. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. J. Chemom. 2003; 17: 274-286.
10. Harshman RA. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an "explanatory" multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1970; 16: 1-84.
11. Bro R. PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1997; 38: 149-171.
12. Bro R, Andersson CA, Kiers HAL. PARAFAC2-part II. Modeling chromatographic data with retention time shifts. J. Chemom. 1999; 13: 295-309.
13. Tucker LR. Some mathematical notes on 3-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966; 31: 279.
14. Amigo JM, Popielarz MJ, Callejon RM, et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromatographic data by using PARAFAC2 and principal components analysis. J Chromatogr A 2010; 1217: 4422-4429.
15. Skov T, Ballabio D, Bro R. Multiblock variance partitioning: a new approach for comparing variation in multiple data blocks. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008; 615: 18-29.
16. Lorenzo-Seva U, ten Berge JMF. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology-Eur 2006; 2: 57-64.