Next-generation sequencing reveals genomic features in the Japanese quail

Genomics

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 345-353

  Kawahara Miki, Ryouka ^a   Sano, Satoshi ^a,b   Nunome, Mitsuo ^c   Shimmura, Tsuyoshi ^c   Kuwayama, Takehito ^a   Takahashi, Shinji ^d   Kawashima, Takaharu ^d   Matsuda, Yoichi ^c   Yoshimura, Takashi ^c   Kono, Tomohiro ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

^b Ulvaniac Inc   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Genome; Japanese quail; Microsatellite; Next generation sequencing technology

Indexed keywords

CONTIG; GENOMIC DNA;

ARTICLE; CHICKEN; COTURNIX JAPONICA; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; MALE; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPERMATOGENESIS;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; COTURNIX; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OPEN READING FRAMES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ANIMALIA; COTURNIX JAPONICA;

EID: 84877922969     PISSN: 08887543     EISSN: 10898646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Van Tuinen M., Dyke G.J. Calibration of galliform molecular clocks using multiple fossils and genetic partitions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 30:74-86.
2. Van Tuinen M., Hedges S.B. Calibration of avian molecular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:206-213.
3. Jiang F., Miao Y., Liang W., Ye H., Liu H., Liu B. The complete mitochondrial genomes of the whistling duck (Dendrocygna javanica) and black swan (Cygnus atratus): dating evolutionary divergence in Galloanserae. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37:3001-3015.
4. Kan X.Z., Li X.F., Lei Z.P., Chen L., Gao H., Yang Z.Y., Yang J.K., Guo Z.C., Yu L., Zhang L.Q., Qian C.J. Estimation of divergence times for major lineages of galliform birds: evidence from complete mitochondrial genome sequences. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9:3073-3078.
5. Balaban E., Teillet M.A., Le Douarin N. Application of the quail-chick chimera system to the study of brain development and behavior. Science 1988, 241:1339-1342.
6. Vali N. The Japanese quail: a review. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 7:925-931.
7. Shibusawa M., Minai S., Nishida-Umehara C., Suzuki T., Mano T., Yamada K., Namikawa T., Matsuda Y. A comparative cytogenetic study of chromosome homology between chicken and Japanese quail. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2001, 95:103-109.
8. Nakao N., Ono H., Yamamura T., Anraku T., Takagi T., Higashi K., Yasuo S., Katou Y., Kageyama S., Uno Y., Kasukawa T., Iigo M., Sharp P.J., Iwasawa A., Suzuki Y., Sugano S., Niimi T., Mizutani M., Namikawa T., Ebihara S., Ueda H.R., Yoshimura T. Thyrotrophin in the pars tuberalis triggers photoperiodic response. Nature 2008, 452:317-322.
9. Yoshimura T., Yasuo S., Watanabe M., Iigo M., Yamamura T., Hirunagi K., Ebihara S. Light-induced hormone conversion of T4 to T3 regulates photoperiodic response of gonads in birds. Nature 2003, 426:178-181.
10. Somes R.J. International Registry of Poultry Genetic Stocks 1988, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
11. Cheng H., Kimura M. Mutations and major variants in Japanese quail. Poultry Breeding and Genetics 1990, 333-362. Elsevier, Amsterdam. R. Crowford (Ed.).
12. Tsudzuki M. Mutations of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) and recent advances of molecular genetics for this species. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 45:159-179.
13. Primmer C.R., Raudsepp T., Chowdhary B.P., Møller A.P., Ellegren H. Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Res. 1997, 7:471-482.
14. Schmid M., Nanda I., Burt D.W. Second report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2005. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005, 109:415-479.
15. Kayang B.B., Fillon V., Inoue-Murayama M., Miwa M., Leroux S., Feve K., Monvoisin J.L., Pitel F., Vignoles M., Mouilhayrat C., Beaumont C., Ito S., Minvielle F., Vignal A. Integrated maps in quail (Coturnix japonica) confirm the high degree of synteny conservation with chicken (Gallus gallus) despite 35million years of divergence. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:101.
16. Tiersch T.R., Wachtel S.S. On the evolution of genome size of birds. J. Hered. 1991, 82:363-442.
17. Nakamura D., Tiersch T.R., Douglass M., Chandler R.W. Rapid identification of sex in birds by flow cytometry. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1990, 53:201-205.
18. Wilcox F.H., Clark C.E. Chicken-quail hybrids. J. Hered. 1961, 52:167-170.
19. Murchison E.P., Schulz-Trieglaff O.B., Ning Z., Alexandrov L.B., Bauer M.J., Fu B., Hims M., Ding Z., Ivakhno S., Stewart C., Ng B.L., Wong W., Aken B., White S., Alsop A., Becq J., Bignell G.R., Cheetham R.K., Cheng W., Connor T.R., Cox A.J., Feng Z.P., Gu Y., Grocock R.J., Harris S.R., Khrebtukova I., Kingsbury Z., Kowarsky M., Kreiss A., Luo S., Marshall J., McBride D.J., Murray L., Pearse A.M., Raine K., Rasolonjatovo I., Shaw R., Tedder P., Tregidgo C., Vilella A.J., Wedge D.C., Woods G.M., Gormley N., Humphray S., Schroth G., Smith G., Hall K., Searle S.M., Carter N.P., Papenfuss A.T., Futreal P.A., Campbell P.J., Yang F., Bentley D.R., Evers D.J., Stratton M.R. Genome sequencing and analysis of the Tasmanian devil and its transmissible cancer. Cell 2012, 148:780-791.
20. Kaufman J., Milne S., Gobel T.W.F., Walker B.A., Jacob J.P., Auffray C., Zoorob R., Beck S. The chicken B locus is a minimal essential major histocompatibility complex. Nature 1999, 401:923-925.
21. Consortium I.C.G.S. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004, 432:695-716.
22. Shiina T., Shimizu S., Hosomichi K., Kohara S., Watanabe S., Hanzawa K., Beck S., Kulski J.K., Inoko H. Comparative genomic analysis of two avian (quail and chicken) MHC regions. J. Immunol. 2004, 172:6751-6763.
23. Hosomichi K., Shiina T., Suzuki S., Tanaka M., Shimizu S., Iwamoto S., Hara H., Yoshida Y., Kulski J.K., Inoko H., Hanzawa K. The major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) class IIB region has greater genomic structural flexibility and diversity in the quail than the chicken. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:322.
24. Spradling A., Drummond-Barbosa D., Kai T. Stem cells find their niche. Nature 2001, 414:98-104.
25. Takahashi S., Inooka S., Mizuma Y. Selective breeding for high and low antibody responses to inactivated Newcastle disease virus in Japanese quails. Poult. Sci. 1984, 63:595-599.
26. Shimizu S., Shiina T., Hosomichi K., Takahashi S., Koyama T., Onodera T., Kulski J.K., Inoko H. MHC class IIB gene sequences and expression in quails (Coturnix japonica) selected for high and low antibody responses. Immunogenetics 2004, 56:280-291.
27. Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1754-1760.
28. Li R., Zhu H., Ruan J., Qian W., Fang X., Shi Z., Li Y., Li S., Shan G., Kristiansen K., Li S., Yang H., Wang J., Wang J. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 2010, 20:265-272.
29. Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:589-595.
30. Boetzer M., Henkel C.V., Jansen H.J., Butler D., Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:578-579.
31. Birney E., Clamp M., Durbin R. Genewise and genomewise. Genome Res. 2004, 14:988-995.
32. Stanke M., Diekhans M., Baertsch R., Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:637-644.
33. Li W., Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1658-1659.
34. Fujimoto A., Nakagawa H., Hosono N., Nakano K., Abe T., Boroevich K.A., Nagasaki M., Yamaguchi R., Shibuya T., Kubo M., Miyano S., Nakamura Y., Tsunoda T. Whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive variant analysis of a Japanese individual using massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:931-936.
35. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:3389-3402.
36. Huang D.W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:44-57.
37. Huang D.W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:1-13.
38. Glaubitz J.C. Convert: a user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4:309-310.
39. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., Marshall T.C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1099-1106.
40. Raymond M., Rousset F. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86:248-249.
41. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
42. Takezaki N., Nei M., Tamura K. POPTREE2: software for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing other population statistics with Windows interface. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:747-752.
43. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
44. Earl D., vonHoldt B. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4:359-361.
45. Stein L.D., Mungall C., Shu S., Caudy M., Mangone M., Day A., Nickerson E., Stajich J.E., Harris T.W., Arva A., Lewis S. The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database. Genome Res. 2002, 12:1599-1610.