Mixed integer programming of generalized hydro-thermal self-scheduling of generating units

Electrical Engineering

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 109-125

  Aghaei, J ^a   Ahmadi, A ^b   Shayanfar, H A ^b   Rabiee, A ^c  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c SHAHREKORD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Dynamic ramp rate; Hydro thermal self scheduling; Mixed integer programming; Prohibited operating zones; Valve loading effect

Indexed keywords

MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING; PROHIBITED OPERATING ZONE; RAMP RATES; SELF-SCHEDULING; VALVE LOADING EFFECTS;

INTEGER PROGRAMMING; PROFITABILITY;

SCHEDULING;

EID: 84877921692     PISSN: 09487921     EISSN: 14320487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-012-0246-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Voorspools KR, D'haeseleer WD (2003) Long-term unit commitment optimization for large power systems: unit decommitment versus advanced priority listing. Appl Energy 76(1-3): 157-167
2. Lee FN (1988) Short-term thermal unit commitment-a new method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3(2): 421-428
3. Tang J, Luh PB (1995) Hydrothermal scheduling via extended differential dynamic programming and mixed coordination. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(4): 2021-2028
4. Hsu YY, Su CC, Liang CC, Lin CJ, Huang CT (1991) Dynamic security constrained multi-area unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6(3): 1049-1055
5. Ma H, Shahidehpour SM (1999) Unit commitment with transmission security and voltage constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(2): 757-764
6. Salam MS (2004) Comparison of Lagrangian relaxation and truncated dynamic programming methods for solving hydrothermal coordination problems. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent sensing and information processing, pp 265-270
7. Parrilla E, Garcia-Gonzlez J (2006) Improving the B&B search for large-scale hydrothermal weekly scheduling problems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28(5): 339-348
8. Bisanovic S, Hajro M, Dlakic M (2008) Hydrothermal self-scheduling problem in a day-ahead electricity market. Electr Power Syst Res 78(9): 1579-1596
9. Delarue E, D'haeseleer W (2008) Adaptive mixed-integer programming unit commitment strategy for determining the value of forecasting. Appl Energy 85(4): 171-181
10. Ma H, Shahidehpour M (1998) Transmission-constrained unit commitment based on benders decomposition. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 20(4): 287-294
11. Liu C, Shahidehpour M, Wu L (2010) Extended benders decomposition for two-stage SCUC. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(2): 1192-1194
12. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
13. Fogel DB (2000) What is evolutionary computation. IEEE Spectr 37(2): 28-32
14. Sheblé GB, Maifeld TT, Brittig K, Fahd G, Fukurozaki- Coppinger S (1996) Unit commitment by genetic algorithm with penalty methods and a comparison of lagrangian search and genetic algorithm - economic dispatch example. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 18(6): 339-346
15. Lakshmi K, Vasantharathna S (2009) A profit based unit commitment problem in deregulated power markets. In: International conference on power systems ICPS' 09, pp 1-6
16. Wong KP, Wong YW (1994) Short-term hydrothermal scheduling. II. Parallel simulated annealing approach. Proc IEEE Gener Transm Distrib 141(5): 502-506
17. Simopoulos DN, Kavatza SD, Vournas CD (2006) Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(1): 68-76
18. Sriyanyong P, Song YH (2005) Unit commitment using particle swarm optimization combined with Lagrange relaxation. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 3: 2752-2759
19. Jiekang W, Jianquan Z, Guotong C, Hongliang Z (2008) A hybrid method for optimal scheduling of short-term electric power generation of cascaded hydroelectric plants based on particle swarm optimization and chance-constrained programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4): 1570-1579
20. Ouyang Z, Shahidehpour SM (1992) A hybrid artificial neural network-dynamic programming approach to unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 7(1): 236-242
21. Kurban M, Filik UB (2008) Unit commitment scheduling by using the autoregressive and artificial neural network models based short-term load forecasting. In: Proceedings PMAPS '08 of the 10th international Conference on probabilistic methods applied to Power Systems, pp 1-5
22. Niknam T (2010) A new fuzzy adaptive hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for non-linear, non-smooth and non-convex economic dispatch problem. Appl Energy 87(1): 327-339
23. Rajan CCA, Mohan MR (2004) An evolutionary programming-based tabu search method for solving the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1): 577-585
24. Yang HT, Yang PC, Huang CL (1996) Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch for units with non-smooth fuel cost functions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(1): 112-118
25. Niknam T, Khodaei A, Fallahi F (2009) A new decomposition approach for the thermal unit commitment problem. Appl Energy 86(9): 1667-1674
26. Catalao JPS, Mariano SJPS, Mendes VMF, Ferreira LAFM (2010) A practical approach for profit-based unit commitment with emission limitations. Electr Power Energy Syst 32(3): 218-224
27. Kazempour SJ, Moghaddam MP (2011) Risk-constrained self-scheduling of a fuel and emission constrained power producer using rolling window procedure. Electr Power Energy Syst 33(2): 359-368
28. Padhy NP (2004) Unit commitment - a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2): 1196-2005
29. Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling, and risk management. Wiley, New York
30. Nilsson O, Sjelvgren D (1997) Hydro unit start-up costs and their impact on the short term scheduling strategies of swedish power producers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(1): 38-44
31. Daneshi H, Choobbari AH, Shahidehpour M, Li Z (2008) Mixed integer programming method to solve security constrained unit commitment with restricted operating zone limits. In: IEEE International conference on electro/information technology EIT, pp 187-192
32. Arroyo JM, Conejo AJ (2000) Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(3): 1098-1104
33. Li T, Shahidehpour M (2005) Price-based unit commitment: a case of lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4): 2015-2025
34. Walters DC, Sheble GB (1993) Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loading. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(3): 1325-1332
35. Selvakumar AI, Thanushkodi K (2007) A new particle swarm optimization solution to non-convex economic dispatch problems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1): 42-51
36. Amjady N, Rad HN (2009) Non-convex economic dispatch with AC constraints by a new real coded genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(3): 1489-1502
37. Wu L, Shahidehpour M, Li T (2008) GENCO's risk-based maintenance outage scheduling. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(1): 127-136
38. Li T, Shahidehpour M (2007) Dynamic ramping in unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(3): 1379-1381
39. Li Z, Shahidehpour M (2005) Security-constrained unit commitment for simultaneous clearing of energy and ancillary services markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(2): 1079-1088
40. Wu L, Shahidehpour M, Li T (2007) Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(2): 800-811
41. Li T, Shahidehpour M (2007) Risk-constrained generation asset arbitrage in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(3): 1330-1339
42. Mezger AJ, de-Almeida KC (2007) Short term hydrothermal scheduling with bilateral transactions via bundle method. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 29(5): 387-396
43. Galiana FD, Kockar I, Franco PC (2002) Combined pool/bilateral dispatch - part I: performance of trading strategies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(1): 92-99
44. Conejo AJ, Arroyo JM, Contreras J, Villamor FA (2002) Self-scheduling of a hydro producer in a pool-based electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(4): 1265-1272
45. Generalized algebraic modeling systems (GAMS). http://www.gams.com
46. Vahidinasab V, Jadid S (2010) Stochastic multiobjective self-scheduling of a power producer in joint energy and reserves markets. Electr Power Syst Res 80(7): 760-769