Development of a simple root model to study the effects of single exudates on the development of bacterial community structure

Journal of Microbiological Methods

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 30-36

  Ziegler, Maren ^a   Engel, Marion ^a   Welzl, Gerhard ^a   Schloter, Michael ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

16S rRNA fingerprinting; A. thaliana; Bacterial communities; Exudates; Roots

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; CARBON SOURCE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; PLANT ROOT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RHIZOSPHERE; ROOT EXUDATE; SOIL MICROFLORA; SPECIES COMPOSITION;

ARABIDOPSIS; BACTERIA; BIOTA; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GLUCOSE; MALATES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANT EXUDATES; PLANT ROOTS; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; SERINE;

EID: 84877903799     PISSN: 01677012     EISSN: 18728359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson J., Domsch K.H. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1978, 10:215-221.
2. Badri D., Vivanco J. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:666-681.
3. Badri D., Weir T., van der Lelie D., Vivanco J. Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant-microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:642-650.
4. Bais H., Weir T., Perry L., Gilroy S., Vivanco J. The role of root exudates in the rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57:233-266.
5. Baudoin E., Benizri E., Guckert A. Impact of growth stage on the bacterial community structure along maize roots, as determined by metabolic and genetic fingerprinting. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2002, 19:135-145.
6. Berg G., Smalla K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape community structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 68:1-13.
7. Chelius M., Triplett E. The diversity of archaea and bacteria in association with the roots of Zea mays L. Microb. Ecol. 2001, 41:252-263.
8. Dakora F., Phillips D. Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil 2002, 245:35-47.
9. Delhaize E., Ryan P.R., Randall P.J. Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (II. Aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices). Plant Physiol. 1993, 103:695-702.
10. Dennis P., Miller A.J., Hirsch P. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 72:313-327.
11. Edwards J., Huws S., Kim E., Kingston-Smith A. Characterization of the dynamics of initial bacterial colonization of nonconserved forage in the bovine rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 62:323-335.
12. Eilers K., Lauber C., Knight R., Fierer N. Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42:896-903.
13. 2 evolution and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of bacterial communities in soil following addition of low molecular weight substrates to simulate root exudation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35:775-782.
14. Grayston S., Vaughan D., Jones D. Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of roots exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1997, 5:29-56.
15. Griffiths B., Ritz K., Ebblewhite N., Dobson G. Soil microbial community structure: effects of substrate loading rates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 31:145-153.
16. Hamlen R., Lukezic F., Bloom J. Influence of age and stage of development on the neutral carbohydrate components in root exudates from alfalfa plants grown in gnotobiotic environment. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1972, 52:633-642.
17. Hartmann A., Schmid M., van Tuinen D., Berg G. Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil 2009, 321:235-257.
18. Hiltner L. Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründüngung und Brache. Arb. DLG 1904, 98:59-78.
19. Hodge A., Robinson D., Fitter A. Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen?. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:304-308.
20. Kaye J., Hart S. Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:139-143.
21. 2 evolution, nitrogen transformations and ATP content of rhizosphere and bulk soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38:509-516.
22. Lynch J., Whipps J. Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 1990, 129:1-10.
23. Micallef S., Channer S., Shiaris M., Colon-Carmona A. Plant age and genotype impact the progression of bacterial community succession in the Arabidopsis rhizosphere. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4:777-780.
24. Morris C., Monier J. The ecological significance of biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003, 41:429-453.
25. Narasimhan K., Basheer C., Bajic V., Swarup S. Enhancement of plant-microbe interactions using a rhizosphere metabolomics-driven approach and its application in the removal of polychlorinated biphenyls. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132:146-153.
26. Nikita T., Sumida K., Kato J., Ohtake H. Rapid method for analyzing bacterial behavioral responses to chemical stimuli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58:2250-2254.
27. Nguyen C. Rhizodeposition of organic C by plant: mechanisms and controls. Sustainable Agriculture 2009, 97-123. Springer, Netherlands. 1st edn. E. Lichtfouse, M. Navarette, P. Debaeke, S. Véronique, C. Alberola (Eds.).
28. Odham G., Tunlid A., Valeur A., Sundin P., White D. Model system for studies of microbial dynamics at exuding surfaces such as the rhizosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 52:191-196.
29. Paterson E., Gebbing T., Abel C., Sim A., Telfer G. Rhizodeposition shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure in organic soil. New Phytol. 2007, 173:600-610.
30. Pellet D., Grunes D., Kochian L. Organic acid exudation as an aluminum-tolerance mechanism in maize (Zea Mays L.). Planta 1995, 196:788-795.
31. Rastogi G., Tech J., Coaker G., Leveau J. A PCR-based toolbox for the culture-independent quantification of total bacterial abundances in plant environments. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 83:127-132.
32. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna.
33. Rudrappa T., Biedrzycki M., Bais H. Causes and consequences of plant-associated biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 64:153-166.
34. Rudrappa T., Czymmek K., Pare P., Bais H. Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148:1547-1556.
35. Sakai M., Matsuka A., Komura T., Kanazawa S. Application of a new PCR primer for terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the bacterial communities in plant roots. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004, 59:81-89.
36. Shi S., Richardson A., O'Callaghan M., DeAngelis K., Jones E., Steward A., Firestone M., Condron L. Effects of selected root exudate components on soil bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 77:600-610.
37. Simons M., Permentier H., de Weger L., Wijffelman C., Lugtenberg B. Amino acid synthesis is necessary for tomato root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS365. Mol. Plant-Microbe 1997, 10:102-106.
38. Sørensen J. The Rhizosphere as a Habitat for Soil Microorganisms. Modern Soil Microbiology 1997, 21-45. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1st edn. J.D. van Elsas, J.T. Trevors, E.M.H. Wellington (Eds.).