Accelerated spike resampling for accurate multiple testing control

Neural Computation

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 418-449

  Harrison, Matthew T ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877890985     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00399     Document Type: Letter

References (19)

1. Amarasingham, A. (2004). Statistical methods for the assessment of temporal structure in the activity of the nervous system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
2. Amarasingham, A., Harrison, M. T., Hatsopolous, N., & Geman, S. (2012). Conditional modeling and the jitter method of spike re-sampling. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 517-531.
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289-300.
4. Benjamini, Y.,&Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate inmultiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
5. Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dudoit, S., Shaffer, J., & Boldrick, J. (2003).Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statistical Science, 18, 71-103.
7. Farcomeni, A. (2008). A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17, 347-388.
8. Fujisawa, S., Amarasingham, A., Harrison, M. T., & Buzśaki, G. (2008). Behaviordependent short-term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 823-833.
9. Gr̈un, S. (2009). Data-driven significance estimation for precise spike correlation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 1126-1140.
10. G̈utig, R., Aertsen, A., & Rotter, S. (2003). Analysis of higher-order neuronal interactions based on conditional inference. Biological Cybernetics, 88, 352-359.
11. Harrison, M. T. (2005). Discovering compositional structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
12. Harrison, M. T. (2012). Conservative hypothesis tests and confidence intervals using importance sampling. Biometrika, 99, 57-69.
13. Harrison, M. T., Amarasingham, A., & Kass, R. E. (in press). Statistical identification of synchronous spiking. In P. D. Lorenzo & J. Victor (Eds.), Spike timing: Mechanisms and function. London: Taylor & Francis.
14. Accelerated Spike Resampling for Accurate Multiple Testing Controls 449 Harrison, M. T., & Geman, S. (2009). A rate and history-preserving algorithm for neural spike trains. Neural Computation, 21(5), 1244-1258.
15. Hesterberg, T. (1995).Weighted average importance sampling and defensive mixture distributions. Technometrics, 37(2), 185-194.
16. Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing statistical hypotheses (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
17. Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. New York: Springer. Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo statistical methods. NewYork: Springer- Verlag.
18. Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo statistical methods. NewYork: Springer- Verlag.
19. Ventura, V., Cai, C., & Kass, R. E. (2005). Statistical assessment of time-varying dependence between two neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 2940-2947.