Teacher Evaluation as Trojan Horse: The Case for Teacher-Developed Assessments

Measurement

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 24-29

  Briggs, Derek C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877847742     PISSN: 15366367     EISSN: 15366359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2013.784153     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Gordon, R., Kane, T. and Staiger, D. 2006. Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job (Discussion Paper 2006-01), Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
2. th, Edited by: Brennan, R. 17 - 64. Westport, CT: Praeger. InEd.editionpp
3. Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B., Le, V. N. and Martinez, J. F. 2007. The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44 (1): 47 - 67.
4. MET Project. 2010. Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project, Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
5. Papay, J. P. 2011. Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (1): 163 - 193.
6. Shepard, L. A. 2008. " A brief history of accountability testing, 1965-2007 ". In The future of test-based educational accountability, Edited by: Ryan, K. and Shepard, L. New York, NY: Routledge. InEds.
7. Wilson, M. and Sloane, K. 2001. From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13 (2): 181 - 208.