Sensitivity of the RBANS to acute traumatic brain injury and length of post-traumatic amnesia

Brain Injury

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 689-695

  Lippa, Sara M ^a,b   Hawes, Samuel ^a,c   Jokic, Emily ^a   Caroselli, Jerome S ^a,b,d  

^a TIRR MEMORIAL HERMANN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Head injury; Post traumatic amnesia; RBANS; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DELAYED MEMORY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY SEVERITY; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; POSTTRAUMATIC AMNESIA; POSTTRAUMATIC COMPLICATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; RATING SCALE; READING; REPEATABLE BATTERY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL STATUS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STANDARDIZATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 84877846178     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: 1362301X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.771793     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998;20:310-319 (Pubitemid 28539551)
2. Gontkovsky ST, McSwan KL, Scott JG. Sensitivity of the semantic fluency subtest of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Psychological Reports 2002;90:858-860
3. Stellton D. The role of the RBANS-A and DRS in the diagnosis and cognitive profiling of Alzheimer's disease. Dissertaton Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2006;67:1200
4. Beatty WW, Ryder KA, Gontkovsky ST, Scott JG, McSwan KL, Bharucha KJ. Analyzing the subcortical dementia syndrome of Parkinson's disease using the RBANS. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2003;18:509-520 (Pubitemid 36593198)
5. Beglinger LJ, Duff K, Allison J, Theriault D, O'Rourke JJ, Leserman A, Paulsen JS. Cognitive change in patients with Huntington disease on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010;32:573-578
6. Freilich BM, Hyer LA. Relation of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status tömeasures of daily functioning in dementia. Psychological Reports 2007;101: 119-129
7. Hobson VL, Hall JR, Humphreys-Clark JD, Schrimsher GW, O'Bryant SE. Identifying functional impairment with scores from the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2010;25:525-530
8. Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: A reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. International Psychogeriatriatrics 1997;9(Suppl 1): 173-176, discussion 177-178 (Pubitemid 28045357)
9. Larson E, Kirschner K, Bode R, Heinemann A, Goodman R. Construct and predictive validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in the evaluation of stroke patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005;27:16-32 (Pubitemid 40392830)
10. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation 1987;1:6-18
11. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-Term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992;73:519-526
12. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing 1983;12:166-170 (Pubitemid 15212131)
13. Wilde MC. The validity of the repeatable battery of neuropsychological status in acute stroke. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006;20:702-715 (Pubitemid 44410546)
14. Wilde MC. Lesion location and repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status performance in acute ischemic stroke. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2010;24: 57-69
15. Gold JM, Queern C, Iannone VN, Buchanan RW. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia I: Sensitivity, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry 1999;156:1944-1950
16. Hobart MP, Goldberg R, BartköJJ, Gold JM. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. American Journal of Psychiatry 1999;156:1951-1957
17. Wilk CM, Gold JM, Humber K, Dickerson F, Fenton WS, Buchanan RW. Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: Normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Schizophrenia Research 2004;70:175-186 (Pubitemid 39141096)
18. Pachet AK. Construct validity of the Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) with acquired brain injury patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007;21: 286-293 (Pubitemid 46514931)
19. McKay C, Casey JE, Wertheimer J, Fichtenberg NL. Reliability and validity of the RBANS in a traumatic brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2007;22:91-98 (Pubitemid 46209594)
20. Benton A. Revised Benton Visual Retention TestThe Psychological Corporation. New York; 1974
21. McKay C, Wertheimer JC, Fichtenberg NL, Casey JE. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): Clinical utility in a traumatic brain injury sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2008;22:22-241
22. Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale töassess cognition after head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1979;167:675-684
23. Novack TA, Dowler RN, Bush BA, Glen T, Schneider JJ. Validity of the Orientation Log, relative töthe Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000;15:957-961 (Pubitemid 30350364)
24. Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test 4 Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006
25. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004
26. Brooks DN, Aughton ME, Bond MR, Jones P, Rizvi S. Cognitive sequelae in relationship töearly indices of severity of brain damage after severe blunt head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1980;43:529-534 (Pubitemid 10059193)
27. Russel WR. Cerebral involvement in head injury. Brain 1932;55:549-603
28. Russell WR, Smith A. Post-Traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961;5:4-17
29. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R. Prognosis after severe head injury. Ciba Foundation Symposium 1975;34:309-324
30. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MVB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. Journal of Neurosurgery 1991;75: S14-S20
31. Thurman DJ, CoronadöV, Selassie T. The epidemiology of TBI: Implications for public health. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte R, editors. Brain injury medicine principles and practiceDemos Medical Publishing. New York; 2007. pp 45-56
32. Katz DI, Alexander MP. Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted törehabilitation. Archives of Neurology 1994;51: 661-670 (Pubitemid 24201884)