A participatory approach for selecting cost-effective measures in the WFD context: The Mar Menor (SE Spain)

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 458-460, Issue , 2013, Pages 303-311

  Perni, Angel ^a   Martínez Paz, José M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness analysis; Eutrophication; Pairwise comparison technique; Stakeholders; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST-EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS; COST-EFFECTIVE MEASURES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS; EUROPEAN WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON TECHNIQUE; STAKEHOLDERS; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES;

BIOMARKERS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; EUTROPHICATION; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

GROUND WATER;

COASTAL LAGOON; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUTROPHICATION; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; MARINE POLLUTION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUTROPHICATION; FISHING; INTERVIEW; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEASHORE; SPAIN; TOURISM; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SPAIN; WATER QUALITY;

MAR MENOR; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; MURCIA [SPAIN]; SPAIN;

EID: 84877829541     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.029     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. ACA Programa de medidas del Plan de gestión del distrito de cuenca fluvial de Catalunya. Anexo IV. Análisis coste-eficacia 2010, Agencia Catalana del Agua, Barcelona.
2. Alcon F., Martin-Ortega J., Berbel J., de Miguel M.D. Environmental benefits of reclaimed water: an economic assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Water Policy 2012, 14(1):148-159.
3. Almansa C., Martinez-Paz J.M. Intergenerational equity and dual discounting. Environ Dev Econ 2011, 16:685-707.
4. Almansa C., Martinez-Paz J.M. What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:1305-1314.
5. Arnette A., Zobel C., Bosch D., Pease J., Metcalfe T. Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: effects of participant grouping scenarios. Environ Model Software 2010, 25(11):1459-1469.
6. Balana B.B., Vinten A., Slee B. A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:1021-1031.
7. Balana B.B., Lago M., Baggaley N., Castellazzi M., Sample J., Stutter M., et al. Integrating economic and biophysical data in assessing cost-effectiveness of buffer strip placement. J Environ Qual 2012, 41:380-388.
8. Bald J., Borja A., Muxika I., Franco J., Valencia V. Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Mar Pollut Bull 2005, 50:1508-1522.
9. Bartolini F., Gallerani V., Raggi M., Viaggi D. Implementing the water framework directive: contract design and the cost of measures to reduce nitrogen pollution from agriculture. Environ Manage 2007, 40:567-577.
10. Baudron P., Barbecot F., García-Aróstegui J.L., Leduc C., Travi Y., Martínez-Vicente D. Impacts of human activities on recharge in a multilayered semiarid aquifer (Campo de Cartagena, SE Spain). Hydrol Process 2013, 10.1002/hyp.9771.
11. Berbel J., Martin-Ortega J., Mesa P. A cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving measures for the Water Framework Directive: the case of the Guadalquivir River Basin in Southern Spain. Water Resour Manag 2011, 25:623-640.
12. Bertram C., Rehdanz K. On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2013, 38:25-40.
13. Birol E., Karousakis K., Koundouri P. Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 2006, 365:105-122.
14. Blanco-Gutierrez I., Varela-Ortega C., Flichman G. Cost-effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures: a multi-level analysis with policy implications. Agric Water Manag 2011, 98:639-652.
15. Borin M., Passoni M., Thiene M., Tempesta T. Multiple functions of buffer strips in farming areas. Eur J Agron 2010, 32:103-111.
16. Bozoki S., Rapcsak T. On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices. J Glob Optim 2008, 42(2):157-175.
17. Bravo M., Gonzalez I., Garcia-Bernabeu A. Ranking supply oriented policies of water management policies from institutional stakeholders' political views. A Delphi survey on irrigation water in the Júcar basin area. Eur Water 2010, 31:43-58.
18. Brouwer R., De Blois C. Integrated modelling of risk and uncertainty underlying the cost and effectiveness of water quality measures. Environ Model Software 2008, 23:922-937.
19. Buchy M., Hoverman S. Understanding public participation: a review. Forest Policy Econ 2000, 1:15-25.
20. Cardoch L., Day J.W., Rybczyk J.M., Kemp G.P. An economic analysis of using wetlands for treatment of shrimp processing wastewater - a case study in Dulac, LA. Ecol Econ 2000, 33:93-101.
21. Cherry K.A., Shepherd M., Withers P.J.A., Mooney S.J. Assessing the effectiveness of actions to mitigate nutrient loss from agriculture: a review of methods. Sci Total Environ 2008, 406:1-23.
22. CHS Esquema Provisional de Temas Importantes. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS) 2008, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
23. Conesa H.M., Jimenez-Carceles F.J. The Mar Menor lagoon (SE Spain): a singular natural ecosystem threatened by human activities. Mar Pollut Bull 2007, 54:839-849.
24. De Marchi B., Funtowicz S.O., Lo Cascio S., Munda G. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation: an empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecol Econ 2000, 34:267-282.
25. Elofsson K. Cost-effectiveness of the Baltic Sea action plan. Mar Policy 2010, 34:1043-1050.
26. European Commission Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy 2000.
27. European Commission Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin management plans 2012.
28. European Commission Commission staff working document. Member State: Spain. Accompanying the document - Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin Management Plans 2012.
29. FIEA El Mar Menor. Estado actual del conocimiento científico 2009, Fundación Instituto Euromediterráneo del Agua, Murcia.
30. Finnegan J. Economic aspects of preparing river basin management plans under the water framework directive. Irish J Agri-Environ Res 2009, 7:11-18.
31. Gamper C.D., Turcanu C. On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis. Ecol Econ 2007, 62(2):298-307.
32. Geneletti D. Formalising expert opinion through multi-attribute value functions: an application in landscape ecology. J Environ Manage 2005, 76:255-262.
33. Grindlay A.L., Zamorano M., Rodriguez M.I., Molero E., Urrea M.A. Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: integration of hydrological and regional planning at the Segura River Basin, southeast Spain. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:242-256.
34. Grossmann M. Economic value of the nutrient retention function of restored floodplain wetlands in the Elbe River basin. Ecol Econ 2012, 83:108-117.
35. Gustafson A., Flesicher S., Joelsson A. A catchment-oriented and cost-effective policy for water protection. Ecol Eng 2000, 14(4):419-427.
36. Hanley N., Black A.R. Cost-benefit analysis and the Water Framework Directive in Scotland. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2006, 2(2):156-165.
37. Herath G. Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process. J Environ Manage 2004, 70:263-273.
38. Ibañez J.A. Desalación de aguas. Aspectos tecnológicos, medioambientales, jurídicos y económicos 2009, Fundación Instituto Euromediterráneo del Agua, Murcia (Spain).
39. Joyce J., Convery F. Understanding the economics of the Water Framework Directive. Biol Environ Proc R Ir Acad 2009, 109B:377-383.
40. Kangas J. An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. For Ecol Manage 1994, 70:74-88.
41. Lam Q.D., Schmalz B., Fohrer N. The impact of agricultural best management practices on water quality in a North German lowland catchment. Environ Monit Assess 2011, 183:351-379.
42. Lapuente E. Full cost in desalination. A case study of the Segura River Basin. Desalination 2012, 300:40-45.
43. Ledoux L., Turner R.K. Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action. Ocean Coast Manag 2002, 45:583-616.
44. Maguire B., Potts J., Fletcher S. Who, when, and how? Marine planning stakeholder involvement preferences - a case study of the Solent, United Kingdom. Mar Pollut Bull 2011, 62:2288-2292.
45. Marchamalo M., Romero C. Participatory decision-making in land use planning: an application in Costa Rica. Ecol Econ 2007, 63:740-748.
46. MARM Orden MARM/2656/2008 de 10 septiembre por la que se aprueba la instrucción de la planificación hidrológica. BOE núm. 229, de 22 de septiembre de 2008 2008, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Rural y Marino (MARM), Madrid (Spain).
47. Martínez-Paz J.M., Martínez-Fernández J., Esteve M.A. Evaluación económica del tratamiento de drenajes agrícolas en el Mar Menor (SE España). Rev Esp Estud Agrosociales Pesqueros 2007, 215/217:211-232.
48. Martínez-Paz J.M., Perni A., Martínez-Carrasco F. Assessment of the programme of measures for coastal lagoon environmental restoration using cost-benefit analysis. Eur Plan Stud 2013, 21(2):131-148.
49. Martin-Ortega J. Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environ Sci Policy 2012, 24:83-91.
50. Martin-Ortega J., Balana B. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive: a comparative analysis of the United Kingdom and Spain. Eur Water 2012, 37:15-25.
51. Messner F. Applying participatory multicriteria methods to river basin management: improving the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 2006, 24:159-167.
52. Mouratiadou I., Moran D. Mapping public participation in the Water Framework Directive: a case study of the Pinios River Basin, Greece. Ecol Econ 2007, 62:66-76.
53. Navarro-Caballero M.T. Reutilización de aguas regeneradas. Aspectos tecnológicos y jurídicos 2010, Fundación Instituto Euromediterráneo del Agua, Murcia (Spain).
54. Okada H., Styles S.W., Grismer M.E. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to irrigation project improvement: Part II. How professionals evaluate an irrigation project for its improvement. Agric Water Manag 2008, 95(3):205-210.
55. Orfanidis S., Panayotidis P., Ugland K.I. Ecological evaluation index continuous formula (EEI-c) application: a step forward for functional groups, the formula and reference condition values. Mediterr Mar Sci 2011, 12:199-231.
56. Paneque P., Corral S., Guimaraes A., del Moral L., Pedregal B. Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives. A case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga). Ecol Econ 2009, 68:990-1005.
57. Perni A., Martinez-Carrasco F., Martinez-Paz J.M. Economic valuation of coastal lagoon environmental restoration: Mar Menor (SE Spain). Ciencias Marinas 2011, 37:175-190.
58. Peterson D.L., Silsbee D.G., Schmoldt D.L. A case-study of resources management planning with multiple objectives and projects. Environ Manage 1994, 18:729-742.
59. Ramanathan R. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manage 2001, 63:27-35.
60. Ramanathan R., Ganesh L.S. Group-preference aggregation methods employed in Ahp - an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members weightages. Eur J Oper Res 1994, 79:249-265.
61. Saaty T.L. The analytical hierarchy process 1980, McGrawHill, Nueva York.
62. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process 2000, Kluwer, Boston.
63. Stemplewski J., Krull D., Wermter P., Nafo I.I., Palm N., Lange C. Integrative socio-economic planning of measures in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Water Environ J 2008, 22:250-257.
64. Strager M.P., Rosenberger R.S. Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecol Econ 2006, 57:627-639.
65. Trepel M. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of the water purification function of wetlands for environmental planning. Ecol Complex 2010, 7:320-326.
66. Valinia S., Hansen H.P., Futter M.N., Bishop K., Sriskandarajah N., Fölster J. Problems with the reconciliation of good ecological status and public participation in the Water Framework Directive. Sci Total Environ 2012, 433:482-490.
67. van Engelen D., Seidelin C., van der Veeren R., Barton D.N., Queb K. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU water framework directive. Water Policy 2008, 10:207-220.
68. Velasco J., Lloret J., Millan A., Marin A., Barahona J., Abellan P., et al. Nutrient and particulate inputs into the Mar Menor lagoon (Se Spain) from an intensive agricultural watershed. Water Air Soil Pollut 2006, 176:37-56.
69. Videira N., Antunes P., Santos R. Scoping river basin management issues with participatory modelling: The Baixo Guadiana experience. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:965-978.
70. Vinten A.J.A., Martin-Ortega J., Glenk K., Booth P., Balana B.B., MacLeod M., et al. Application of the WFD cost proportionality principle to diffuse pollution mitigation: a case study for Scottish Lochs. J Environ Manage 2012, 97:28-37.
71. o 1. Economics and the environment - the implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive 2003, Office for Oficial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
72. Wedley W.C., Choo E.U., Schoner B. Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios. Eur J Oper Res 2001, 133:342-351.
73. Whitmarsh D., Palmieri M.G. Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: the use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences. Mar Policy 2009, 33:452-457.
74. Wright S.A.L., Fritsch O. Operationalising active involvement in the EU Water Framework Directive: why, when and how?. Ecol Econ 2011, 70(12):2268-2274.
75. Wright S.A.L., Jacobsen B.H. Participation in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Denmark: the prospects for active involvement. Water Policy 2011, 13(2):232-249.
76. Zanou B., Kontogianni A., Skourtos M. A classification approach of cost effective management measures for the improvement of watershed quality. Ocean Coast Manag 2003, 46:957-983.
77. Zanou B., Bellas C., Skourtos M. Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: procedures and a simple model for the identification of the most cost-effective measures in eutrophicated catchments. Water Policy 2010, 12:369-380.