Mechanical valve replacement versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in the tricuspid valve position

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 212-217

  Cho, Won Chul ^a   Park, Chong Bin ^a   Kim, Joon Bum ^a   Jung, Sung Ho ^a   Chung, Cheol Hyun ^a   Choo, Suk Jung ^a   Lee, Jae Won ^a  

^a University of Ulsan   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL HEART VALVE; MEDIASTINITIS; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; MORTALITY; MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE; PERIPHERAL EDEMA; PNEUMONIA; PULMONARY VALVE REPLACEMENT; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURVIVAL TIME; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TRICUSPID VALVE DISEASE; TRICUSPID VALVE PROSTHESIS; TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; ADULT; AGED; BIOPROSTHESIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRICUSPID VALVE;

EID: 84877827235     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.12093     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kawano H, Oda T, Fukunaga S, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve: 19 Years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18: 565-569.
2. Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Leung Y, Ohri SK, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: Bioprostheses are preferable. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 644-648.
3. Van Nooten GJ, Caes FL, Francois KJ, et al. The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 Years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995; 9: 441-446, discussion 446-447.
4. Kaplan M, Kut MS, Dermirtas MM, et al. Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: Bioprosthetic or mechanical. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 467-473.
5. Thorburn CW, Morgan JJ, Shanahan MX, et al. Long-term results of tricuspid valve replacement and the problem of prosthetic valve thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 1128-1132.
6. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 708-711.
7. Filsoufi F, Anyanwu AC, Salzberq SP, et al. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 845-850.
8. Rizzoli G, Vendramin I, Nesseris G, et al. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1607-1614.
9. Nakano K, Ishhbashi-Ueda H, Kobayashi J, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: Long-term results and causes of valve dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 105-109.
10. Ratnatunga CP, Edwards MB, Dore CJ, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: UK Heart Valve Registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1940-1947.
11. Carrier M, Hebert Y, Pellerin M, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: An analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 47-50.
12. Sung K, Park PW, Park KH, et al. Is tricuspid valve replacement a catastrophic operation ? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36: 825-829.
13. Ohata T, Kiqawa I, Tohda E, et al. Comparison of durability of bioprostheses in tricuspid and mitral positions. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: S240-S243.
14. Rizzoli G, De Perini L, Bottio T, et al. Prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve: Biological or mechanical ? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S62-S67.