The effect of using the insulin pump bolus calculator compared to standard insulin dosage calculations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus - Systematic review

Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 248-254

  Ramotowska, A ^a   Golicki, D ^b   Dzygalo K ^a   Szypowska, A ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer   (Poland)

Author keywords

bolus calculator; insulin advisor; insulin calculation; insulin pump; type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

CONTROL GROUP; DATA BASE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; EMBASE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN PUMP; INSULIN TREATMENT; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEDLINE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTPRANDIAL STATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DRUG DOSAGE CALCULATIONS; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INFUSION PUMPS, IMPLANTABLE; INSULIN; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 84877826179     PISSN: 09477349     EISSN: 14393646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331708     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Ahola A. J., Mäkimattila S., Saraheimo M. et al. FinnDIANE Study Group Many patients with Type 1 diabetes estimate their prandial insulin need inappropriately. Journal of Diabetes: 2010; 2 194 202
2. Bondia J., Dassau E., Zisser H. et al. Coordinated basal-bolus infusion for tighter postprandial glucose control in insulin pump therapy. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology: 2009; 3 89 97
3. King A. B., Armstrong D. U. A prospective evaluation of insulin dosing recommendations in patients with type 1 diabetes at near normal glucose control: bolus dosing. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology: 2007; 1 42 46
4. Pankowska E., Skórka A., Szypowska A. et al. Memory of insulin pumps and their record as a source of information about insulin therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics: 2005; 7 308 314 (Pubitemid 40586375)
5. Heinemann L. Insulin pump therapy: what is the evidence for using different types of boluses for coverage of prandial insulin requirements? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology: 2009; 3 1490 1500
6. Glaser N. S., Iden S. B., Green-Burgeson D. et al. Benefits of an insulin dosage calculation device for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism: JPEM: 2004; 17 1641 1651 (Pubitemid 40044903)
7. Zisser H., Wagner R., Pleus S. et al. Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics: 2010; 12 955 961
8. Kolassa R., Mühlen H., Maraun M. et al. Use of extended functions of modern insulin pumps Diabetes. Stoffwechsel und Herz: 2010; 19 2010
9. Bevier W. C., Zisser H., Palerm C. C. et al. Calculating the insulin to carbohydrate ratio using the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp-a novel use for a proven technique. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews: 2007; 23 472 478 (Pubitemid 47520904)
10. Pickup J., Mattock M., Kerry S. Glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with intensive insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ: 2002; 324 705 708 (Pubitemid 34259145)
11. Sussman A., Taylor E. J., Patel M. et al. Performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects. J Diabetes Sci Technol: 2012; 6 339 344
12. Barnard K., Parkin C., Young A. et al. Use of an automated bolus calculator reduces fear of hypoglycemia and improves confidence in dosage accuracy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections. J Diabetes Sci Technol: 2012; 6 144 149
13. Schmidt S., Meldgaard M., Serifovski N. et al. Use of an automated bolus calculator in MDI-treated type 1 diabetes: the BolusCal Study, a randomized controlled pilot study. Diabetes Care: 2012; 35 984 990
14. Higgins J., Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Wiley Chichester: 2007
15. Gross T. M., Kayne D., King A. et al. A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics: 2003; 5 365 369 (Pubitemid 36676310)
16. Shashaj B., Busetto E., Sulli N. Benefits of a bolus calculator in pre- and postprandial glycaemic control and meal flexibility of paediatric patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Diabetic Medicine: a Journal of the British Diabetic Association: 2008; 25 1036 1042
17. Garg S. K., Bookout T. R., McFann K. K. et al. Improved glycemic control in intensively treated adult subjects with type 1 diabetes using insulin guidance software. Diabetes Ttechnology & Therapeutics: 2008; 10 369 375
18. Klupa T., Benbenek-Klupa T., Malecki M. et al. Clinical usefulness of a bolus calculator in maintaining normoglycaemia in active professional patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The Journal of International Medical Research: 2008; 36 1112 1116
19. Cukierman-Yaffe T., Konvalina N., Cohen O. Key elements for successful intensive insulin pump therapy in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice: 2011; 92 69 73
20. Enander R., Gundevall C., Strömgren A. et al. Carbohydrate counting with a bolus calculator improves post-prandial blood glucose levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps. Pediatric Diabetes: 2012; 13 545 551
21. Strojek K., Majkowska L., Zozulińska D. et al. Task Force for Postprandial Glycemia. Postprandial glycemia - review of current pathophysiological, epidemiological and clinical aspects. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej: 2007; 117 252 259 (Pubitemid 47508039)
22. DCCT The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The New England Journal of Medicine: 1993; 329 977 986
23. Monnier L., Wojtusciszyn A., Colette C., Owens D. The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics: 2011; 13 813 818
24. Lee S. W., Cao M., Sajid S. et al. The dual-wave bolus feature in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps controls prolonged post-prandial hyperglycaemia better than standard bolus in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism: 2004; 17 211 216 (Pubitemid 39496909)
25. Jones S. M., Quarry J. L., Caldwell-McMillan M. et al. Optimal insulin pump dosing and postprandial glycemia following a pizza meal using the continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics: 2005; 7 233 240 (Pubitemid 40586366)
26. Laurenzi A., Bolla A. M., Panigoni G. et al. Effects of carbohydrate counting on glucose control and quality of life over 24 weeks in adult patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized, prospective clinical trial (GIOCAR). Diabetes Care: 2011; 34 823 827
27. Bachran R., Beyer P., Klinkert C. et al. Initiative; German Pediatric CSII Working Group; BMBF Competence Network Diabetes. Basal rates and circadian profiles in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) differ for preschool children, prepubertal children, adolescents and young adults. Pediatric Diabetes: 2012; 13 1 5