Estimating changes in emissions from bus rapid transit: Making best use of transport sector experience

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 308-316

  Sayeg, Philip ^a   Bray, David ^b  

^a Principal Coffey Environments   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUS RAPID TRANSIT; BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEMS; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; PRIVATE VEHICLES; PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICE; TRANSPORT SECTORS; TRAVEL BEHAVIORS; VEHICLE DRIVERS;

EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ESTIMATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

RAPID TRANSIT;

EID: 84877822399     PISSN: 20418396     EISSN: 2041840X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wene.27     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel advising the Global Environment Facility. Manual for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Global Environmental Facility Transportation Projects. 2010, 8-10.
2. Schipper L, Deakin E, McAndrews C, Scholl L, Frick KT. Considering Climate Change in Latin American and Caribbean Urban Transportation: Concepts, Applications, and Cases: Final Report. Berkeley, CA: Center for Global Metropolitan Studies, University of California; 2009, 3.
3. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel advising the Global Environment Facility. Manual for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Global Environmental Facility Transportation Projects. 2010, 28.
4. UNFCCC/ CCNUCC. Approved Baseline Methodology AM0031: Baseline Methodology for Bus Rapid Transit Projects, Ver 01/ Sectoral Scope: 07; 2006, 2.
5. UNFCCC/ CCNUCC. Approved Consolidated Baseline and Monitoring Methodology ACM0016: Baseline Methodology for Mass Rapid Transit Projects, Ver 01/ Sectoral Scope: 07. 2009, 2.
6. Wright L, Fulton L. Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transp Rev 2005, 25: 691-712.
7. Sayeg P, Bray D. Review of patronage ramp up for recent Asia Pacific mass rapid transit systems. In: Paper presented at the Smart Urban Transport. Brisbane, Australia; 2001.
8. Asian Development Bank. Methodology for Transport Emissions Evaluation Model for Projects. Reference Number: EKB: REG 2010-16 Evaluation Knowledge Brief. Asian Development Bank, Manila; 2010, 25.
9. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel advising the Global Environment Facility. Manual for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Global Environmental Facility Transportation Projects. Washington, D.C., 2010.
10. Schipper L, Deakin E, McAndrews C, Scholl L, Frick KT. Considering Climate Change in Latin American and Caribbean Urban Transportation: Concepts, Applications, and Cases: Final Report. Prepared by Center for Global Metropolitan Studies, University of California: Berkeley, CA: Center for Global Metropolitan Studies, University of California; 2009, 61.
11. Grütter J. The CDM in the Transport Sector. Module 5d of Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy Makers. Eschborn, Germany: German Technical Agency; 2007, 22.
12. Department for Transport. An Introduction to Variable Demand Modelling. TAG Unit 2.9.2, UK. 2006, 2.
13. Richardson A, Ampt E, Meyburg A. Survey Methods for Transport Planning. Australia, Parkville: Eucalyptus Press; 1995, 168.
14. Zegras P, Chen Y, Grütter J. Behavior-based transportation Greenhouse Gas mitigation under the Clean Development Mechanism: transport-efficient development in Nanchang, China. Transportation Research Record No. 2114, Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies; 2009, 39-42.
15. Australian Transport Council. National Guidelines for Transport System Management in Australia-Volume 4: (Urban Transport). Canberra, Australia: Australia: 2006, 55.
16. Bly PH. The effect of fares on bus patronage. Report 733, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Wokingham, UK; 1976, 10.
17. Balcombe R, Mackett R, Paulley N, Preston J, Shires J, Titheridge H, Wardman M. The demand for public transport: a practical guide. Report 593, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Wokingham, UK; 2004, 60.
18. Mackett R. Exploratory analysis of long term travel demand and policy impacts using micro-analytical simulation. In: Jones P, ed., Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Aldershot: Avebury; 1990, 384-405.
19. Instituto Nacional de Ecologia. The Benefits and Costs of a Bus Rapid Transit System in Mexico City-Final Report. Mexico City; 2009, 11.
20. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual-Special Report 209. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board; 1998, 2-19.
21. Hemmen L, Perdok J. The car that stays at home. Eur Transp Conf 1996, 402.
22. Gross JM. The Car Left Home. New York: Department of Transportation; 1979, 16.
23. Mokhtarian P, Handy S, Salomon I. Methodological Issues in the Estimation of the Travel, Energy, and Air Quality Impacts of Telecommuting. University of California, Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California; 1995, 293.