Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: Comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques

Cancer Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 150-154

  Scholten, Ernst Th ^a,b   Mali, Willem P Th M ^a   Prokop, Mathias ^c   Van Ginneken, Bram ^c   Glandorf, Ron ^d   Van Klaveren, Rob ^e   Oudkerk, Matthijs ^f   De Jong, Pim A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Kennemer Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Linnaeusinstituut   (Netherlands)

^e Lievensberg Hospital   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LOW ENERGY RADIATION; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

AGED; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84877817712     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14707330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2221-2229. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0906085. PMid:- 19955524.
2. Seltzer SE, Judy PF, Adams DF, et al. Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film- based viewing. Radiology 1995; 197: 73-78. PMid:7568857.
3. Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS, et al. Pulmonary nodules on multidetector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2005; 234: 274-283. doi:10.1148/radiol.2341040589. PMid:15537839. (Pubitemid 39658396)
4. Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S. Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 14-22. doi:10.1007/ s00330-004-2527-6. PMid:15526207. (Pubitemid 40109764)
5. Gruden JF, Ouanounou S, Tigges S, Norris SD, Klausner TS. Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 149-157. doi:10.2214/ ajr.179.1.1790149. (Pubitemid 34694828)
6. Eibel R, Turk TR, Kulinna C, Herrmann K, Reiser MF. Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT der Lunge: Multiplanare Rekonstruktionen und Maximum-Intensit€ats- Projektionen in der Detektion von Lungenrundherden. Rofo 2001; 173: 815-821. doi:10.1055/s-2001-16981. PMid:11582561. (Pubitemid 32895857)
7. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, et al. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 2002; 225: 673-683. doi:10.1148/radiol.2253011375. PMid:12461245. (Pubitemid 35387101)
8. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1053-1057. doi:10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053. (Pubitemid 34411393)
9. Godoy MCB, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009; 253: 606-624. doi:10.1148/radiol. 2533090179. PMid:19952025.
10. Peloschek P, Sailer J, Weber M. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 2007; 243: 561-569. doi:10.1148/radiol.2432052052. PMid:17456878. (Pubitemid 46649713)
11. Marten K, Engelke C. Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 888-901. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0410- 3. PMid:17047961. (Pubitemid 46766870)