Validity of student self-reported ratings of learning

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 377-388

  Benton, Stephen L ^a   Duchon, Dennis ^b   Pallett, William H ^a  

^a IDEA Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

college students; learning objectives; self report; student ratings

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877794797     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.636799     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baird, J.S. 1987. Perceived learning in relation to student evaluation of university instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79: 90 - 91.
2. Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain, New York, NY: David McKay.
3. Braskamp, L.A. and Ory, J.C. 1994. Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Cashin, W.E. 1995. Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32. Manhattan, KS: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
5. Cohen, J. 1977. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Cohen, P.A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51: 281 - 309.
7. Feldman, K.A. 1989. The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 33: 317 - 375.
8. Hoyt, D.P. 1973. Measurement of instructional effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 1: 367 - 378.
9. Hoyt, D.P., and W.E. Cashin. 1977. IDEA Technical Report No. 1: Development of the IDEA System. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
10. Hoyt, D.P., Y. Chen, W.H. Pallett and A.B. Gross. 1999. Technical Report No. 11: Revising the IDEA system for obtaining student ratings of instructors and courses. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
11. Hoyt, D.P., and E. Lee. 2002. Technical Report No. 12: Basic data for the revised IDEA system. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
12. Hoyt, D.P., and S. Perera. 2000. IDEA Research Report No. 2: Validity of the IDEA student ratings of instruction system: An update. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
13. Krathwohl, D.R. 1998. Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Longman.
14. Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. and Masia, B.B. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Affective domain, New York, NY: David McKay.
15. Marks, M., D. Fairris, and T. Beleche. in press. Do course evaluations reflect student learning? Evidence from a pre-test/post-test setting. Review of Economics and Statistics.
16. Marsh, H.W. 1984. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 707 - 754.
17. McKeachie, W.J. 1979. Student ratings of faculty: Reprise. Academe, 65: 384 - 397.
18. Messick, S. 1995. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons, responses, and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50: 741 - 749.
19. Ory, J.C. and Ryan, K. 2001. " How do student ratings measure up to a new validity framework? ". In Online student ratings of instruction: New directions for teaching and learning, Edited by: Johnson, T.D. and Sorenson, D.L. 27 - 44. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Remmers, H.H. 1930. To what extent do grades influence student ratings of instructor?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21: 314 - 316.
21. Rosenthal, R. 1969. Task variations in studies of experimenter expectancy effects. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 29: 9 - 10.