The linguistic production of genderlessness in the superintendency

Reconsidering Feminist Research in Educational Leadership

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 81-102

  Scott, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877775621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Banks, C. A. M. (1995). Gender and race as factors in educational leadership and administration. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 65-80). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
2. Bell, C. S. (1995). "If I weren't involved in schools, I might be radical": Gender consciousness in context. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 288-312). Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
4. Bergvall, V. (1996). Constructing and enacting gender through discourse: Negotiating multiple roles as female engineering students. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 173-201). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
5. Blackmore, J. (1993). 'In the shadow of men': The historical construction of educational administration as a 'masculinist' enterprise. In J. Blackmore & J. Kenway (Eds.), Gender matters in educational administration and policy: A feminist introduction (pp. 27-48). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.
6. Blount, J. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency 1873-1995. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Brunner, C. C. (1998). The new superintendency: Power and decision-making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
9. Cameron, D. (1996). The language-gender interface: Challenging co-optation. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 31-53). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
10. Chase, S. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women school superintendents. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
11. Clegg, S. (1977). Power, organization, Marx and critique. In S. Clegg & D. Dunkerley (Eds.), Critical issues in organizations (pp. 9-21). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (1994). Dislocating masculinity: Gender, power and anthropology. In A. Cornwall & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Dislocating masculinity (pp. 11-47). New York: Routledge.
13. Curcio, J., Morsink, C., & Bridges, S. (1989). Women as leaders: Moving beyond the stage of powerlessness. Educational Horizons, 31(4), 150-155.
14. Deal, J., & Stevenson, M. (1998). Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plus ca change. Sex Roles, 38(314), 287-300.
15. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
16. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Vol. I. New York: Vintage.
17. Freed, A. F. (1996). Language and gender research in an experimental setting. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 54-76). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
18. Gal, S. (1994). Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In C. Roman, S. Juhasz, & C. Miller (Eds.), The women and language debate: A sourcebook (pp. 406-431). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19. Gal, S. (1995). Language, gender, and power: An anthropological review. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 169-182). New York: Routledge.
20. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21. Greenwood, A. (1996). Floor management and power strategies in adolescent conversation. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 77-97). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
22. Grogan, M. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Koonce, R. (1997). Language, sex, and power: Women and men in the workplace. Training and Development, 31(9), 34-39.
24. Korabik, K. (1990). Androgyny and leadership style. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 283-292.
25. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31, (2), 87-99.
26. Lincoln, Y. A. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(3), 275-289.
27. Lutz, C. (1990). Engendered emotion: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In C. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod (Eds.), Language and the politics of emotion (pp. 61-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. McElhinny, B. (1995). Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 217-244). New York: Routledge.
29. McElhinny, B. (1996). An economy of affect: Objectivity, masculinity, and the gendering of police work. In A. Cornwall & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Dislocating masculinity: Comparative ethnographies (pp. 158-171). London: Routledge.
30. Meier, K., & Wilkins, V. (2002). Gender differences in agency head salaries: The case of public education. Public Administration Review, 31(4), 405-411.
31. Morris, R. C. (1995). All made up: Performance theory and the new anthropology of sex and gender. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 567-592.
32. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 337-358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Olesen, V. (1994). Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Reinharz, S. (1992). Conclusions. In Feminist methods in social research (pp. 240-269). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Scott, J. (1999). Constructing identity through power and discourse in exemplary women superintendents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
36. Skrla, L. (1998). The social construction of gender in the superintendency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
37. Skrla, L. (2000). Mourning silence: Women superintendents (and a researcher) reflect on speaking up and speaking out. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(6), 611-628.
38. Smith, D. E. (1989). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
39. Smulyan, L. (1998). Feminist cases of nonfeminist subjects: Case studies of women principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
40. Tallerico, M., Poole, W., & Burstyn, J. N. (1994). Exits from urban superintendencies: The intersection of politics, race, and gender. Urban Education, 28, 439-454.
41. Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: How women's and men's conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: William Morrow.
42. Theweleit, K. (1977). Male fantasies: Volume I: Women, floods, bodies, history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43. Theweleit, K. (1989). Male fantasies: Volume II: Male bodies: psychoanalyzing the white terror. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.