To be involved or not to be involved: A survey of public preferences for self-involvement in decision-making involving mental capacity (competency) within Europe

Palliative Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 418-427

  Daveson, Barbara A ^a   Bausewein, Claudia ^a   Murtagh, Fliss E M ^a   Calanzani, Natalia ^a   Higginson, Irene J ^a   Harding, Richard ^a   Cohen, Joachim ^b,c   Simon, Steffen T ^d   Deliens, Luc ^b,e   Bechinger English, Dorothee ^a   Hall, Sue ^a   Koffman, Jonathan ^a   Ferreira, Pedro Lopes ^f   Toscani, Franco ^g   Gysels, Marjolein ^h   Ceulemans, Lucas ⁱ   Haugen, Dagny F ^j   Gomes, Barbara ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^g Lino Maestroni Foundation   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^j NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

cancer; caregivers; Decision making; Europe; family; mental competency; palliative care; physicians

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BELGIUM; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GENDER; GERMANY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; ITALY; LIVING WILL; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MENTAL CAPACITY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOME; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PORTUGAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESIDENTIAL CARE; RESIDENTIAL HOME; REVIEW; SPAIN; TERMINAL CARE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 84877758982     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: 1477030X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269216312471883     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Biondi S. Autonomy and end-of-life advance directives in Italy: the courts' struggle against the political majority's attacks on constitutional rights. Clin Ethics. 2012 ; 5: 67-72
2. Recommendation CM/Rec(2009) 11 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on principles concerning continuing powers of attorney and advance directives for incapacity. Eur J Health Law. 2010 ; 17: 205-210
3. Rurup ML, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Van der Heide A, et al. Frequency and determinants of advance directives concerning end-of-life care in The Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 2006 ;: 1552-1563 (Pubitemid 43197837)
4. Wiesing U, Jox RJ, Heßler HH-J, et al. A new law on advance directives in Germany. J Med Ethics. 2010 ; 36: 779e - 783e
5. Mental Capacity Act 2005:2005. Ministry of Justice, UK.
6. Belanger E, Rodriguez C, Groleau D. Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis. Palliat Med. 2011 ; 25 (3). 242-261
7. Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, et al. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006 ; 9: 321-332 (Pubitemid 44701036)
8. Parliamentary Assembly. Protecting human rights and dignity by taking into account previously expressed wishes of patients. Resolution 1859 (2012), 1-2. 2012. 25-1-2012.
9. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making - a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 ; 20 (6). 531-535 (Pubitemid 41003809)
10. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 ; 45 (9). 941-950
11. Seymour J, Gott M, Bellamy G, et al. Planning for end of life: the views of older people about advance care statements. Soc Sci Med. 2004 ; 59: 57-68 (Pubitemid 38490346)
12. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. (Online) Person-centred healthcare: a policy framework. (accessed 8 January 2013).
13. Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, et al. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.. Ann Oncol. 2012 ; 23: 2006-2015
14. Harding R, Higginson IJ. PRISMA: a pan-European co-ordinating action to advance the science in end-of-life cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2010 ; 46 (9). 493-501
15. Rizzo L, Brick JM, Park I. A minimally intrusive method for sampling persons in random digit dial surveys. Public Opin Q. 2004 ; 68 (2). 267-274 (Pubitemid 38919956)
16. Daveson BA, Bechinger-English D, Bausewein C, et al. Constructing understandings of end-of-life care in Europe: a qualitative study involving cognitive interviewing with implications for cross-national surveys. J Palliat Med. 2011 ; 14: 343-349
17. Dewolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, et al EORTC quality of life group translation procedure. 3 rd ed.Brussels: EORTC Quality of Life Group, 2009; pp. 1-32.
18. Ghisletta P, Spini D. An introduction to generalized estimating equations and an application to assess selectivity effects in a longitudinal study on very old individuals. J Educ Behav Stat. 2004 ; 29 (4). 421-437 (Pubitemid 40097367)
19. Teno J, Gruneir A, Schwartz Z, et al. Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 ; 55: 189-194 (Pubitemid 46184393)
20. Brogan DJ, Denniston MM, Liff JM, et al. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 ; 153 (11). 1119-1127 (Pubitemid 32493262)
21. Lee S, Brick JM, Brown ER, et al. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys. Health Serv Res. 2010 ; 45 (4). 1121-1139
22. Pardon K, Deschepper R, Stichele RV, et al. Preferences of patients with advanced lung cancer regarding the involvement of family and others in medical decision-making. J Palliat Med. 2010 ; 13 (10). 1199-1203
23. Barry BRN, Henderson ARN. Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient. Cancer Nurs. 1996 ; 19 (5). 384-391