Surgical training on rectal cancer surgery: Do supervised senior residents differ from consultants in outcomes?

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 671-677

  Pastor, Carlos ^a   Cienfuegos, Javier A ^b   Baixauli, Jorge ^b   Arredondo, Jorge ^b   Sola, Jesus J ^b   Beorlegui, Carmen ^b   Hernandez Lizoain, Jose Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Postoperative complication; Rectal surgery; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; RESIDENT; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSULTANTS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84877713010     PISSN: 01791958     EISSN: 14321262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1686-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK et al (2007) Verbal feed-back from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 193:105-110
2. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryal RDH (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery - the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 69:613-616
3. McArdle CS, Hole D (1991) Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 302:1501-1505
4. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2001) Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:1397-1402
5. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E et al (2002) Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 236:583-592
6. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer - implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857-866
7. Palham L, Bohe M, Cedermark B et al (2007) The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg 94:1285-1292
8. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, Van de Velde CHJ (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142-1149
9. Codina-Cazador A, Espin E, Biondo S et al (2007) Audited teaching program for the treatment of rectal cancer in Spain: results of the first year. Cir Esp 82:209-213
10. Programa Nacional de Especialidad (2012) (article in Spanish). Available at: http://www.aecirujanos.es/programanacionalespecialidad.php. Accessed 1 April 2013
11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205-213
12. Copeland GP, Sagar P, Brennan J et al (1995) Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study. Br J Surg 82:408-411
13. Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83:812-815
14. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339-351
15. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1:996-999
16. AJCC (2010) Colon and rectum. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition. Springer, New York, 143-164
17. Ruo L, Tickoo S, Klimstra DS et al (2002) Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy. Ann Surg 236:75-81
18. Singh KK, Aitken RJ (1999) Outcome in patients with colorectal cancer managed by surgical trainees. Br J Surg 86:1332-1337
19. Mack LA, Temple WJ (2005) Education is the key to quality of surgery for rectal cancer. ESJO 31:636-644
20. Maslekar S, Sharma A, MacDonald A et al (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Color Dis 8:790-794
21. Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M et al (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparosocopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 6:943-951
22. Patel SP, Gauger PG, Brown DL et al (2010) Resident participation does not affect surgical outcomes, despite the introduction on new techniques. J Am Coll Surg 211:540-545
23. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L et al (2009) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:CD006575
24. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L et al (2008) Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088-1097
25. De Grave WS, Dolmans DH, van der Vleuten CP (1999) Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning. Med Educ 33:901-906
26. Abernethy B (1993) Searching for the minimal essential information for skilled perception and action. Psychol Res 55:131-138
27. Custers EJFM, Boshuixen HPA (2002) The psychology of learning. In: Norman GR, Vand der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI (eds) International handbook of research in medical education, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht