Practical implications of pre-employment nurse assessments

Health Care Manager

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 189-192

  Kuthy, James E ^a   Ramon, Cheree ^a   Gonzalez, Ronald ^b   Biddle, Dan A ^a  

^a Biddle Consulting Group   (United States)

^b Prophecy Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

content validation; criterionrelated validation; nurse assessments; nurse hiring; situational judgment tests

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; NURSING STAFF; PERSONALITY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; NURSES; NURSING STAFF; PERSONALITY; PERSONNEL SELECTION;

EID: 84877704229     PISSN: 15255794     EISSN: 1550512X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31828ef687     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Chan D, Schmitt N. Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:143-159. (Pubitemid 127370026)
2. Christian MS, Edwards BE, Bradley JC. Situational judgment tests: constructs assessed and a metaanalysis of their criterion-related validities. Personnel Psychol. 2010;63:83-117.
3. Hunter J, Schmidt F, Le H. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:594-612. (Pubitemid 43936973)
4. US Department of Labor: Employment and Training Administration. Testing and Assessment: An Employer's Guide to Good Practices. Washington, DC: Department of Labor; 2000.
5. Taylor H, Russell J. The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: discussion and tables. J Appl Psychol. 1939;23: 565-578.
6. Cascio W, Boudreau J. Investing in People: Financial Impact of Human Resource Initiatives. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press; 2010.