Differences in psychophysiological responses due to simulator sickness sensitivity

IFMBE Proceedings

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1218-1221

  Chung, S C ^a   You, J H ^a   Kwon, J H ^a   Lee, B ^a   Tack, G R ^a   Yi, J H ^a   Lee, S Y ^b  

^a Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Psychophysiological responses; Sick and non sick group; Simulator sickness

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DISEASES; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SIMULATORS;

AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES; SICK AND NON-SICK GROUP; SIMULATOR SICKNESS; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEMS;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 84877701405     PISSN: 16800737     EISSN: 14339277     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_294     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Kennedy RS, Fowlkes JE. (1992) Simulator sickness is polygenic and polysymptomatic:Implications for research. Int J Avia Psycho 2:23-38.
2. Richard HY, So RHY, Lo WT. (1999) Cybersickness: an experimental study to isolate the effect of rotational scene oscillations. Proceedings of the IEEE Vitual Reality, pp. 237-241.
3. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS et al. (1993) A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psycho 3:203-220.
4. Sue VGC, Sarah N, Amanda R et al. (1999) Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presense 8:169-186.
5. Valentino DA, Arruda JE, Gold SM. (1993) Comparison of QEEG and response accuracy in good vs. poorer performers during a vigilance task. Int J Psychophy 15: 23-134.
6. Min BC, Chung SC, Min YK et al. (2004) Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. App Ergo 35:549-556.