A fish scale-derived collagen matrix as artificial cornea in rats: Properties and potential

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 3224-3233

  Huibertus van Essen, T ^a   Lin, Chien C ^b   Hussain, A Karim ^a   Maas, Saskia ^a   Lai, Horng J ^c   Linnartz, Harold ^d   van den Berg, Thomas J T P ^e   Salvatori, Daniela C F ^a   Luyten, Gregorius P M ^a   Jager, Martine J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Body Organ Biomedical Corporation   (Taiwan)

^c Aeon Astron Europe BV ^*  (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial cornea; Biocompatibility; Keratoprosthesis; Transparency

Indexed keywords

GRAMICIDIN; NEOMYCIN; POLYMYXIN B;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL INFILTRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA NEOVASCULARIZATION; CORNEA OPACITY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; FISH SCALE DERIVED COLLAGEN MATRIX; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KERATOPLASTY; LIGHT SCATTERING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUTURING METHOD;

ARTIFICIAL CORNEA; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; KERATOPROSTHESIS; TRANSPARENCY;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COLLAGEN TYPE I; CORNEA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; LIGHT; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, PHASE-CONTRAST; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; SCATTERING, RADIATION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TILAPIA; TISSUE DONORS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84877683596     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11799     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:214-221.
2. Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, Muehlberg SM, Coster DJ. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology. 1992;99: 403-414.
3. Williams KA, Muehlberg SM, Lewis RF, Coster DJ. How successful is corneal transplantation? A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register. Eye (Lond). 1995;9:219-227.
4. Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, Price FW Jr. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology.2003;110:1396-1402.
5. Waldock A, Cook SD. Corneal transplantation: how successful are we? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:813-815.
6. Hara H, Cooper DK. Xenotransplantation-the future of corneal transplantation? Cornea. 2011;30:371-378.
7. Myung D, Duhamel PE, Cochran JR, Noolandi J, Ta CN, Frank CW. Development of hydrogel-based keratoprostheses: a materials perspective. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24:735-741.
8. Gomaa A, Comyn O, Liu C. Keratoprostheses in clinical practice-a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38: 211-224.
9. Proulx S, d'Arc UJ, Carrier P, et al. Reconstruction of a human cornea by the self-assembly approach of tissue engineering using the three native cell types. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2192-2201.
10. McLaughlin CR, Acosta MC, Luna C, et al. Regeneration of functional nerves within full thickness collagen-phosphorylcholine corneal substitute implants in guinea pigs. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2770-2778.
11. Fagerholm P, Lagali NS, Carlsson DJ, Merrett K, Griffith M. Corneal regeneration following implantation of a biomimetic tissue-engineered substitute. Clin Transl Sci. 2009;2:162-164.
12. Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Maurus C, et al. Reconstruction of corneal stroma with decellularized porcine xenografts in a rabbit model. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:e206-e210.
13. Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Gray T, Meller D. Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:431-441.
14. Meller D, Pauklin M, Thomasen H, Westekemper H, Steuhl KP. Amniotic membrane transplantation in the human eye. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:243-248.
15. Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S. Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1569-1574.
16. Sarnicola V, Toro P, Sarnicola C, Sarnicola E, Ruggiero A. Longterm graft survival in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012; 31:621-626.
17. Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, Lee WB, Kaufman SC, Shtein RM. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:209-218.
18. Borderie VM, Sandali O, Bullet J, Gaujoux T, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:249-255.
19. Fagerholm P, Lagali NS, Merrett K, et al. A biosynthetic alternative to human donor tissue for inducing corneal regeneration: 24-month follow-up of a phase 1 clinical study. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:46-61.
20. Zhou Y, Wu Z, Ge J, et al. Development and characterization of acellular porcine corneal matrix using sodium dodecylsulfate. Cornea. 2011;30:73-82.
21. Du L, Wu X. Development and characterization of a full-thickness acellular porcine cornea matrix for tissue engineering. Artif Organs. 2011;35:691-705.
22. Liu J. Xiamen University. Phase I Study of xenogenic keratoplasty from porcine cornea in the treatment of infectious corneal ulcer. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 2013. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01443559. Accessed January 15, 2013.
23. Chen MH, Li YH, Chang Y, et al. Co-induction of hepatic IGF-I and progranulin mRNA by growth hormone in tilapia, Oreochromis mossambiccus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007; 150:212-218.
24. Okuda M, Ogawa N, Takeguchi M, et al. Minerals and aligned collagen fibrils in tilapia fish scales: structural analysis using dark-field and energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy and electron tomography. Microsc Microanal. 2011;17: 788-798.
25. Lin CC, Ritch R, Lin SM, et al. A new fish scale-derived scaffold for corneal regeneration. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;19:50-57.
26. Sugiura H, Yunoki S, Kondo E, Ikoma T, Tanaka J, Yasuda K. In vivo biological responses and bioresorption of tilapia scale collagen as a potential biomaterial. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20:1353-1368.
27. Williams KA, Coster DJ. Penetrating corneal transplantation in the inbred rat: a new model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26:23-30.
28. Courtman DW, Pereira CA, Kashef V, McComb D, Lee JM, Wilson GJ. Development of a pericardial acellular matrix biomaterial: biochemical and mechanical effects of cell extraction. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:655-666.
29. Coppens JE, Franssen L, van den Berg TJ. Reliability of the compensation comparison method for measuring retinal stray light studied using Monte-Carlo simulations. J Biomed Opt. 2006;11:054010.
30. van den Berg TJ, Franssen L, Kruijt B, Coppens JE. History of ocular straylight measurement: a review. Z Med Phys. 2013;23: 6-20.
31. van den Berg TJ, Franssen L, Coppens JE. Straylight in the human eye: testing objectivity and optical character of the psychophysical measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009; 29:345-350.
32. Bouwman J, Paardekoper DM, Cuppen HM, Linnartz H, Allamandola LJ. Real-time optical spectroscopy of vauum ultraviolet irradiate pyrene: H2O interstellar ice. Astrophys J. 2009;700:56-62.
33. van den Berg TJ, Tan KE. Light transmittance of the human cornea from 320 to 700 nm for different ages. Vision Res. 1994;34:1453-1456.
34. Hackett JM, Lagali N, Merrett K, et al. Biosynthetic corneal implants for replacement of pathologic corneal tissue: performance in a controlled rabbit alkali burn model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:651-657.
35. Sire JY, Arnulf I. Structure and development of the ctenial spines on the scales of a teleost fish, the cichlid Cichlasama nigrofasciatum. Acta Zoologica. 2000;81:139-158.
36. Nischler C, Michael R, Wintersteller C, et al. Cataract and pseudophakia in elderly European drivers. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:892-901.
37. Birnbaum F, Schwartzkopff J, Scholz C, Reinhard T. Topical pimecrolimus does not prolong clear graft survival in a rat keratoplasty model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245:1717-1721.
38. Rocher N, Behar-Cohen F, Pournaras JA, et al. Effects of rat anti-VEGF antibody in a rat model of corneal graft rejection by topical and subconjunctival routes. Mol Vis. 2011;17:104-112.
39. Hosseini A, Lattanzio FA Jr, Samudre SS, Disandro G, Sheppard JD Jr, Williams PB. Efficacy of a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer antisense compound in the inhibition of corneal transplant rejection in a rat cornea transplant model. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012;28:194-201.
40. Schwartzkopff J, Bredow L, Mahlenbrey S, Boehringer D, Reinhard T. Regeneration of corneal endothelium following complete endothelial cell loss in rat keratoplasty. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2368-2375.
41. Li Z, Yao L, Li J, et al. Celastrol nanoparticles inhibit corneal neovascularization induced by suturing in rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1163-1173.
42. Vaisman B, Motiei M, Nyska A, Domb AJ. Biocompatibility and safety evaluation of a ricinoleic acid-based poly(ester-anhydride) copolymer after implantation in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:419-431.
43. Bolboaca SD, Jantschi L. Amino Acids Sequences Analysis onCollagen. Vol. 63-64. Waltham, MA: Academic Press; 2007;311-316.
44. Merrett K, Liu W, Mitra D, et al. Synthetic neoglycopolymer-recombinant human collagen hybrids as biomimetic cross-linking agents in corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5403-5408.
45. Merrett K, Griffith CM, Deslandes Y, Pleizier G, Sheardown H. Adhesion of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified pHEMA surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12: 647-671.