Numerical modeling of composite beam to reinforced concrete wall joints. Part I: Calibration of joint components.

Engineering Structures

Volumn 52, Issue , 2013, Pages 747-761

  Henriques, José ^a   Simões da Silva, Luís ^a   Valente, Isabel B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Composite behavior; Contact; Longitudinal reinforcement bars; Plasticity; Reinforcement concrete interaction; Solid elements

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION PROCESS; COMPOSITE BEHAVIOR; FINITE ELEMENT PACKAGES; FINITE ELEMENT SOFTWARE ABAQUS; LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL; REINFORCEMENT-CONCRETE INTERACTION; SOLID ELEMENTS;

ABAQUS; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETES; CONTACTS (FLUID MECHANICS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PLASTICITY; REINFORCEMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

COMPOSITE; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLASTICITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 84877682659     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Zoetemeijer P. A design method for the tension side of statically-loaded bolted beam-to-column joints. Heron 1974, 20(1):1-59.
2. Da Silva Simões, Simões L., Cruz P.J. Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loading. Eng Struct 2001, 23(11):1383-1409.
3. Jaspart J-P, Étude de la semi-rigidité des nœuds poutre-colonne et son influence sur la résistance des ossatures en acier. PhD Thesis, Department MSM, University of Liège, Belgium; 1991 [in French].
4. Simões da Silva L. Towards a consistent design approach for steel joints under generalized loading. J Constr Steel Res 2008, 64(9):1059-1075.
5. Jaspart J.-P., Vandegans D. Application of the component method to column bases. J Constr Steel Res 1998, 48(2-3):89-106.
6. Wald F., Sokol Z., Steenhuis M., Jaspart J.-P. Component method for column bases. Heron 2008, 53(1/2):3-20.
7. Kuhlmann K, Hofman J, Wald F, da Silva L, Krimpmann M, Sauerborn N et al, New market chances for steel structures by innovative fastening solutions between steel and concrete (INFASO). Final report. Report EUR 25100 EN, European Commission; 2012.
8. Leon R, Lin J. Towards the development of an analytical model for composite semi-rigid connections. Report to AISC. Struct Eng Rep No 86-06. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 1986. p. 83.
9. Puhali R., Smotlak I., Zandonini R. Semi-rigid composite action: experimental analysis and a suitable model. J Constr Steel Res 1990, 15(1-2):121-151.
10. Ahmed B, Li TQ, Nethercot DA. Modelling composite connection response. In: Bjorhovde, Reidar; Colson, André; Zandonini, Riccardo, editor. Connections in steel structures III - behaviour, strength and design. Elsevier; 1996. p: 259-68.
11. Gil B., Bayo E. An alternative design for internal and external semi-rigid composite joints. Part II: Finite element modelling and analytical study. Eng Struct 2008, 30(1):232-246.
12. Henriques J et al. Numerical modeling of composite beam to reinforced concrete wall joints. Eng Struct (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.040.
13. ABAQUS Theory Manual & Users Manuals, Version 6.11-2, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc. USA; 2010.
14. Jankowiak T., Lodygwoski T. Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Found Civil Environ Eng 2005, 6:53-62.
15. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels; 2004.
16. fib: CEB-FIP. fib Bulletin 55: Model Code 2010, Final draft, vol. 1. Lausanne; 2012.
17. Girão Coelho A., Simões da Silva L., Bijlaard F. Numerical evaluation of the behaviour of the T-Stub. J Struct Eng 2006, 132(6):918-928. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006) 132:6(918.
18. Eligehausen R, Popov E, Bertero V. Local bond stress-slip relationship of deformed bars under generalized excitations. Report No. UCB/EERC-83/23, Earthquake Engineering Centre, University of California, Berkeley; 1983.
19. Gan Y. Bond stress and slip modeling in non-linear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto; 2000.
20. EN 1994-1-1. Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels; 2004.
21. Ollgaard J., Slutter R., Fisher J. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete. AISC Eng J 1971, 8:55-64.
22. Henriques J., Raposo J.M., Simõesda Silva L., Neves L.C. Tensile resistance of steel reinforced anchorages: experimental evaluation. ACI Struct J 2013, 110(2).
23. Berger W, Hofmann J, Kuhlmann U. Connections between steel and concrete: joints with supplementary reinforcement. In: Dunai L, Iványi M, Jármai K, Kovács N, Gergely Vigh L, editor. Proceedings of the 6th European conference on steel and composite structures, Budapest, Hungary, volume A; 2011. p. 585-90.
24. Matos JAC, Valente IB, Cruz PJS. Avaliação de Incertezas no Comportamento até à rotura de vigas de betão armado, 1° Congresso Nacional para a Segurança e Conservação de Pontes, Lisboa; 2009. p. II-5-II-12.
25. Chapman J.C., Balakrishnan S. Experiments on composite beams. Struct Eng 1964, 42(11):369-383.
26. Huang Z., Burgess I.W., Plank R.J. The influence of shear connectors on the behavior of composite steel-framed buildings in fire. J Constr Steel Res 1999, 51:219-237.
27. EN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels; 2005.
28. Sokol Z, Wald F. Experiments with T-stubs in tension and compression. Research report, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague; 1997.
29. Bursi O., Jaspart J.-P. Benchmarks for finite element modelling of bolted steel connections. J Constr Steel Res 1997, 43:17-42.