Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 77, Issue , 2013, Pages 27-40

  Schwartz, Amy Ellen ^a   Stiefel, Leanna ^a   Wiswall, Matthew ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education reform; Heterogeneous treatment; Instrumental variables; Small schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877674586     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abdulkadiroglu A., et al. Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school math. American Economic Review 2009, 99(5):1954-1978.
2. Armour D.L., Peiser B.M. Interdistrict choice in Massachusetts. Learning From School Choice 1998, 157-186. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC. P.E. Peterson, B.C. Hassel (Eds.).
3. Barker R.G., Gump P.V. Big School 1964, Stanford University Press, Small School, Stanford, CA.
4. Barrow, L., Claessens, A., Whitmore Schanzenbach, D., 2010. The impact of small schools in Chicago: Assessing the effectiveness of Chicago's small high school initiative, February. Working paper.
5. Bloom, H., et al., 2010. Transforming the High School Experience. Report June, MDRC, New York.
6. Booker K., et al. The effects of charter high schools on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics 2011, 29(2):377-415.
7. Burgess S., Briggs A. School assignment, school choice and social mobility. Economics of Education Review 2010, 29(4):639-649.
8. Card D. Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. Aspects of Labor Market Behaviour: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp 1995, University of Toronto Press, Toronto. L.N. Christofides, E.K. Grant, R. Swidinsky (Eds.).
9. Conant J.B. The American High School Today 1959, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Corcoran, S.P., et al., 2012 forthcoming. Training your own: The impact of New York City's aspiring principals program on achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
11. Cullen J.B., et al. The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics 2005, 89:729-760.
12. Currie J., Morretti E. Mother's education and the intergenerational transmission of human capital: evidence from college openings. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2003, 118(4):2003.
13. Engberg, J., et al., 2010. Evaluating education programs that have lotteried admission and selective attrition. Working paper.
14. Fowler, Jr., W.J., 1992. What do we know about school size? - What should we know? In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
15. Fowler W.J., Walberg H.J. School size, characteristics, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1991, 13:189-202.
16. Gootman, E., 2005. Gates donates $28.5 million for support of small schools. The New York Times (February 16).
17. Greene J.P., et al. Lessons from the Cleveland scholarship program. Learning From School Choice 1998, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC. P.E. Peterson, B.C. Hassel (Eds.).
18. Haller E.J., et al. School size and program comprehensiveness: evidence from high school and beyond. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1990, 12:109-120.
19. Hastings, J.S., et al., 2006. Parental Preferences and School competition: Evidence from a Public School Choice Program. NBER Working Paper, 11805.
20. Heckman J., Navarro-Lozano S. Using matching, instrumental variables and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Review of Economics and Statistics 2004, 86:30-57.
21. Howley, C., et al., 2000. Research about School Size and School Performance in Impoverished Communities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448968, Charleston, WV.
22. Hoyt W.H., Lee K. Educational vouchers, welfare effects and voting. Journal of Public Economics 1998, 69:211-228.
23. Ladd H. Comment on Caroline M. Hoxby: school choice and school competition: evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review 2003, 10:67-76.
24. Lee V.E., Smith J.B. Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education 1995, 68:241-270.
25. Lee V.E., Smith J.B. High school size: which works best and for whom?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1997, 19:205-227.
26. Lindsay P. The effect of high school size on student participation, satisfaction, and attendance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1982, 4:57-65.
27. McMillen B.J. School size, achievement, and achievement gaps. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2004, 12(58).
28. National Center for Education Statistics, 2010. The Nation's Report Card: Grade 12 Reading and Mathematics 2009 National and Pilot State Results. NCES 2011-455. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC.
29. Page L., et al. National Evaluation of Smaller Learning Communities: Literature Review 2002, Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
30. Saporito S., Lareau A. School selection as a process: the multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice. Social Problems 1999, 46:418-439.
31. Schneider M., Buckley J. What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2002, 24(2):133-144.
32. Schneider M., et al. School choice and culture wars in the classroom: what different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly 1998, 79:489-501.
33. Schneider B., et al. Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2006/2007 2007, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC. T. Loveless, F.M. Hess (Eds.).
34. Stiefel L., et al. High school size: effects on budgets and performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2000, 22:27-39.
35. Stiefel L., et al. Mission matters: the cost of small high schools revisited. Economics of Education Review 2009, 28(5):585-599.
36. Staiger D., Stock J. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 1997, 65(3):557-586.
37. U.S. Department of Education, 2006. Smaller Learning Communities Program. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
38. Watt T.T. Are small schools and private schools better for adolescents' emotional adjustment?. Sociology of Education 2003, 76:344-367.