Methodology for development of guidelines for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

Chest

Volumn 143, Issue 5 SUPPL, 2013, Pages

  Lewis, Sandra Zelman ^a   Diekemper, Rebecca ^a   Addrizzo Harris, Doreen J ^b  

^a American College of Chest Physicians   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; LUNG CANCER; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANEL STUDY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PEER REVIEW ORGANIZATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 84877664301     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2344     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington DC : Institute of Medicine; 2011.
2. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P; Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156 (7): 525-531.
3. American College of Chest Physicians. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer : ACCP evidence-based guidelines. Chest. 2003; 123 (suppl 1): 1S-328S.
4. American College of Chest Physicians. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer : ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007; 132(suppl 3):1S-422S.
5. Alberts, WM. Introduction to the third edition: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): 38S-40S.
6. Leone FT, Evers-Casey S, Toll BA, Vachani A. Treatment of tobacco use in lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143(5)(suppl): e61S-e77S.
7. Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Jantz MA, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): e211S-e250S.
8. Ramnath N, Dilling TJ, Harris LJ. Treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): e314S-e340S.
9. Detterbeck FC, Postmus PE, Tanoue LT. The stage classifi-cation of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidencebased clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): e191S-e210S.
10. Wisnivesky JP, Yung RC-W, Mathur PN, Zulueta JJ. Diagnosis and treatment of bronchial intraepithelial neoplasia and early lung cancer of the central airways: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): e263S-e277S.
11. Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, Balekian AA, Murthy SC. Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143 (5)(suppl): e278S-e313S.
12. Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, et al. The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 : 8:19.
13. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, et al. The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152 (11): 738-741.
14. American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012 : 141(2)(suppl):e1S- e801S.
15. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44 (11): 1271-1278.
16. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7:10.
17. Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-536.
18. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest. 2006; 129 (1): 174-181.
19. Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Pauker SG, Schünemann HJ. Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical prac tice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008; 133(suppl 6): 123S-131S.
20. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al; GRADE Working Group. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ. 2008; 337 : a744.
21. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012; 307 : 2418-2429.
22. Guyatt G, Baumann MH, Pauker S, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest. 2006; 129 (1): 182-187.
23. The ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. version 2.0. http://www.g-i-n.net. 2009. Accessed September 12, 2012.