-
2
-
-
84877676821
-
-
For historical data, see "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation: Historical Listing, March 2004-December 2012" (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013). Historically, union workers hav1e earned more than nonunion workers
-
For historical data, see "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation: Historical Listing, March 2004-December 2012" (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013), ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special. requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.pdf. Historically, union workers have earned more than nonunion workers
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
0007194912
-
Measuring union-nonunion earnings diff erences
-
(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 1990)
-
See Kay E. Anderson, Philip M Doyle, and Albert E. Schwenk, "Measuring union-nonunion earnings diff erences," Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 1990)
-
Monthly Labor Review
-
-
Anderson, K.E.1
Doyle, P.M.2
Schwenk, A.E.3
-
4
-
-
0037677911
-
Union-nonunion Wage Diff erences
-
(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Spring 2000)
-
see also Ann C. Foster, "Union-nonunion Wage Diff erences, 1997," Compensation and Working Conditions (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Spring 2000);
-
(1997)
Compensation and Working Conditions
-
-
Foster, A.C.1
-
5
-
-
84877673566
-
-
http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/archive/ spring2000brief2.pdf.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
84877671338
-
-
Note
-
In 2011, the union membership rate-the percent of wage and salary workers who were members of a union-was 11.8 percent, and the number of workers belonging to unions that year was 14.8 million. In 1983, the fi rst year for which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 percent and there were 17.7 million union workers
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
84877683481
-
Union Members - 2011
-
news release USDL-12-0094 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 27, 2012)
-
See "Union Members - 2011," news release USDL-12-0094 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 27, 2012), http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/union2_01272012.htm.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
84877682889
-
-
Note
-
For data on union representation and membership in 2001
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
84877669225
-
Union Members in 2001
-
news release USDL-02-28 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 17, 2002)
-
see "Union Members in 2001," news release USDL-02-28 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 17, 2002), http://www.bls.gov/news. release/History/union2_01172002.txt
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
84877683481
-
Union Members - 2011
-
for 2011 data
-
for 2011 data, see "Union Members - 2011."
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
84930732888
-
Unions Inequality, and Faltering Middle-Class Wages
-
Issue Brief 342 (Economic Policy Institute, August, 2012)
-
See Lawrence Mishel, "Unions, Inequality, and Faltering Middle-Class Wages," Issue Brief 342 (Economic Policy Institute, August, 2012), http://www.epi.org/publication/ib342-unions-inequality-falteringmiddle-class/.
-
-
-
Mishel, L.1
-
14
-
-
84877648621
-
-
Note
-
Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC) data do not provide a valid time series
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0344463474
-
Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC
-
(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Summer 1997)
-
See Michael K. Lettau, Mark A. Lowenstein, and Aaron T. Cushner, "Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC," Compensation and Working Conditions (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Summer 1997), http://www.bls.gov/opub/ cwc/archive/summer1997art2.pdf.
-
Compensation and Working Conditions
-
-
Lettau, M.K.1
Lowenstein, M.A.2
Cushner, A.T.3
-
16
-
-
84877667689
-
-
Note
-
In the NCS, the term "civilian" refers to the civilian economy, which includes both private industry and state and local government. Excluded from private industry are the self-employed and farm and private household workers. Federal government workers are excluded from the public sector. Th e private industry series and the state and local government series provide data for the two sectors separately
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
84877642771
-
-
Note
-
By the relative standard error, the diff erence is not statistically signifi cant.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
84877640819
-
Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC
-
See Lettau, Lowenstein, and Cushner, "Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC."
-
-
-
Lettau1
Lowenstein2
Cushner3
-
20
-
-
84877649622
-
-
Note
-
State and local government establishments include school teachers who may not receive paid vacation days because of their work schedule
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
84877646166
-
Work Schedules in the National Compensation Survey
-
(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2008)
-
See Richard Schumann, "Work Schedules in the National Compensation Survey," Compensation and Working Conditions Online (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2008), http://www.bls.gov/ opub/cwc/cm20080722ar01p1.htm.
-
Compensation and Working Conditions Online
-
-
Schumann, R.1
-
22
-
-
79955665134
-
U.S., Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions
-
(National Bureau of Economic Research 2010)
-
See "U.S. Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions" (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010), http://www.nber.org/ cycles/cyclesmain.html.
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
84877640819
-
Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC
-
See Lettau, Lowenstein, and Cushner, "Explaining Diff erential Growth Rates of the ECI and ECEC."
-
-
-
Lettau1
Lowenstein2
Cushner3
-
24
-
-
84877639861
-
Union-nonunion Wage Diff erences
-
See Foster, "Union-nonunion Wage Diff erences, 1997."
-
(1997)
-
-
Foster1
|