Filler-nanocellulose substrate for printed electronics: Experiments and model approach to structure and conductivity

Cellulose

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1413-1424

  Penttilä, Antti ^a   Sievänen, Jenni ^b   Torvinen, Katariina ^b   Ojanperä, Kimmo ^b   Ketoja, Jukka A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conductivity; Nano fibrillated cellulose; Pigment particle; Porosity; Printed electronics; Roughness

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRES; INORGANIC FILLERS; MODEL SIMULATION; MODELING APPROACH; PIGMENT PARTICLES; PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE; PRINTED ELECTRONICS; SKELETON STRUCTURE;

CELLULOSE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FILLERS; KAOLIN; POROSITY; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84877636473     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-9883-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bollström R, Määttänen A, Tobjörk D, Ihalainen P, Kaihovirta N, Österbacka R, Peltonen J, Toivakka M (2009) A multilayer coated fiber-based substrate suitable for printed functionality. Org Electron 10(5): 1020-1023.
2. de Berg M, van Kreveld M, Overmars M, Schwarzkopf O (2000) Computational geometry: algorithms and applications. Springer, Berlin.
3. Frenkel D, Smit B (2002) Understanding molecular simulation: from algoritms to applications. Academic Press, San Diego.
4. Hrehorova E, Pekarovicova A, Bliznyuk V, Fleming P (2007) Polymeric materials for printed electronics and their interactions with paper substrates. In: NIP23: international conference on digital printing technologies and digital fabrication, Anchorage, Alaska, pp 928-931.
5. Kantola V, Kulovesi J, Lahti L, Lin R, Zavodchilikova M, Coatanéa E (2009) Printed electronics, now and future. In: Neuvo Y, Ylönen S (eds) Bit bang-Rays to the future, Helsinki University Print, pp 63-102.
6. Kattumenu R, Rebros M, Joyce M, Fleming P, Neelgund G (2009) Effect of substrate properties on conductive traces printed with silver-based flexographic ink. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 24(1): 101-106.
7. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Sci Agric 220(4598): 671-680.
8. Ong C, Gilbert E (2001) Fast versions of the Gilbert-Johnson-Keerthi distance algorithm: additional results and comparisons. IEEE Trans Robotics Autom 17(4): 531-539.
9. Penttilä A (2011) Light scattering in random media with wavelength-scale structures: astronomical and industrial applications. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, http://urn. fi/URN: ISBN: 978-952-10-7073-0.
10. Perram J, Rasmussen J, Præstgaard E, Lebowitz J (1996) Ellipsoid contact potential: theory and relation to overlap potentials. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids 54: 6565-6572.
11. Persistence of Vision Pty Ltd (2004) (2011) Persistence of vision raytracer (version 3. 6). Computer software, retrieved from http://www. povray. org/download/.
12. Rew J (2003) Fortran 95 implementation of Quicksort algorithm. Computer algorithm, retrieved from http://www. fortran. com/qsort_c. f95.
13. Torvinen K, Sievänen J, Hjelt T, Hellén E (2012) Smooth and flexible filler-nanocellulose composite structure for printed electronics applications. Cellul Chem Technol 19(3): 821-829.
14. van Delst P (2004) Fortran utilities. Computer algorithms, retrieved from http://www. ssec. wisc. edu/~paulv/.
15. Vidal D, Zou X, Uesaka T (2003a) Modelling of coating structure development using a Monte-Carlo deposition method. Part Charact 1: modelling methodology. TAPPI J 2(4): 3-8.
16. Vidal D, Zou X, Uesaka T (2003b) Modelling of coating structure development using a Monte-Carlo deposition method. Part Charact 2: validation and case study. TAPPI J 2(5): 16-20.
17. Vidal D, Zou X, Uesaka T (2004) Modelling coating structure development: Monte-Carlo deposition of particles with irregular shapes. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 19(4): 442-449.
18. Volten H, Muñoz O, Hovenier J, de Haan J, Vassen W, van der Zande W, Waters L (2005) WWW scattering matrix database for small mineral particles at 441. 6 and 632. 8 nm. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 90(2): 191-206.