Do patient reported outcome measures do more harm than good?

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 346, Issue 7906, 2013, Pages

  Wolpert, Miranda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; HUMAN; LETTER; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 84877605839     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2669     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 2013;346:f167. (28 January.)
2. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Aronson JK. Evidence-based medical monitoring: from principles to practice. Blackwell, 2008.
3. Wolpert M, Fugard A J B, Deighton J, Görzig A. Routine outcomes monitoring as part of children and young people's improving access to psychological therapies (CYP IAPT)-improving care orunhelpful burden? Child Adolesc Ment Health 2012;17:129-30.
4. Freely available training materials and emergent thinking on use of outcome measures and data in context of child and adolescent mental health provided by EBPU. UCL. www.ucl.ac.uk/clinical-psychology/EBPU/presentations/ presentations.php.