Nurse perceptions of family home-visiting programmes in Australia and England

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 369-374

  Sawyer, Michael Gifford ^a,c   Barnes, Jacqueline ^e   Frost, Linda ^c   Jeffs, Debra ^d   Bowering, Kerrie ^d   Lynch, John ^b,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d Faculty of Health Sciences   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

children; home visits; maternal child health; nurse perceptions; nurses

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FAMILY NURSE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM; FAMILY SERVICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MOTHER; NURSE; NURSE ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; SMOKING; SOCIAL WELFARE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ENGLAND; HEALTH EDUCATION; HOME CARE SERVICES; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT CARE; MOTHERS; NURSES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84877582902     PISSN: 10344810     EISSN: 14401754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12197     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chaffin M,. Is it time to rethink Healthy Start/Healthy Families? Child Abuse Negl. 2004; 28: 589-595.
2. Gomby DS,. Home visitation in 2005: outcomes for children and parents. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development: Invest in Kids Working Group, 2005.
3. Olds DL, Sadler L, Kitzman H,. Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2007; 48: 355-391.
4. Sweet M, Appelbaum M,. Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Dev. 2004; 75: 1435-1456.
5. Wise S, da Silva L, Webster E, Sanson A,. The efficacy of early childhood interventions. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne; AIFS Research Report No.14, 2005.
6. Chalmers K,. Difficult work: health visitors' work with clients in the community. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 1994; 31: 168-182.
7. Zeanah PD, Larrieu JA, Boris NW, Nagle GA,. Nurse home visiting: perspectives from nurses. Infant Ment. Health J. 2006; 27: 41-54.
8. McNaughton DB,. A synthesis of qualitative home visiting research. Public Health Nurs. 2000; 17: 405-414.
9. De La Cuesta C,. Relationships in health visiting: enabling and mediating. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 1994; 31: 451-459.
10. Kitzman HJ, Cole R, Yoos HL, Olds D,. Challenges experienced by home visitors: a qualitative study of program implementation. J. Community Psychol. 1997; 25: 95-109.
11. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, et al. The Family-Nurse Partnership Programme in England: Wave 1 Implementation in Toddlerhood & a Comparison between Waves 1 and 2a of Implementation in Pregnancy and Infancy. London: Department of Health, 2011; 128. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod- consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh-123366.pdf [accessed 31 July 2012].
12. Gill S, Greenberg M, Moon D, Margraf P,. Home visitor competence, burnout, support, and client engagement. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2007; 15: 23-44.
13. Olds DL, Kitzman H,. Can home visitation improve the health of women and children at environmental risk? Pediatrics 1990; 86: 108-116.
14. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, McLeish J, Belsky J, FNP Implementation Reseach Team. Nurse-Family Partnership Programme: First Year Pilot Sites Implementation in England: Pregnancy and the Post-Partum Period. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2008; 132. Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/ DCSF-RW051 [accessed 31 July 2012].
15. Barnes J, Ball M, Meadows P, Belsky J, FNP Implementation Reseach Team. Nurse-Family Partnership Programme-Second Year Pilot Sites Implementation in England: The Infancy Period. London: Department for Children Schools and Families, 2009; 126. Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/ standard/publicationdetail/page1/DCSF-RR166 [accessed 31 July 2012].
16. Davis H, Day C,. Working in Partnership: The Family Partnership Model. London: Pearson, 2010.
17. Miller WR, Rollnick S,. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Publishing, 2002.
18. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.; 2012.
19. Jack SM, DiCenso A, Lohfeld L,. A theory of maternal engagement with public health nurses and family visitors. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005; 49: 182-190.
20. Harden BJ, Denmark N, Saul D,. Understanding the needs of staff in Head Start programs: the characteristics, perceptions, and experiences of home visitors. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2010; 32: 371-379.
21. Heaman M, Chalmers K, Woodgate R, Brown J,. Relationship work in an early childhood home visiting program. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2007; 22: 319-330.
22. Hood M,. Home Visiting Manual. Children Youth and Women's Health Service: Government of South Australia; 2007.
23. Olds DL,. The nurse-family partnership: an evidence-based preventive intervention. Infant Ment. Health J. 2006; 27: 5-25.