Approximation of Data by Decomposable Belief Models

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Volumn 80 PART 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 40-49

  Jiroušek, Radim ^a  

^a BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURES; DATA FILES; DECOMPOSABLE MODELS; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY OF EVIDENCE; MARKOV MODEL; MISSING VALUES; PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE; SAMPLE DISTRIBUTIONS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84877580848     PISSN: 18650929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14055-6_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ben Yaghlane, B., Smets, P., Mellouli, K.: Belief Function Independence: I. The Marginal Case. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 29(1), 47-70 (2002)
2. Ben Yaghlane, B., Smets, P., Mellouli, K.: Belief Function Independence: II. The Conditional Case. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 31(1-2), 31-75 (2002)
3. Couso, I., Moral, S., Walley, P.: Examples of independence for imprecise probabilities. In: de Cooman, G., Cozman, F.G., Moral, S., Walley, P. (eds.) Proceedings of ISIPTA 1999, pp. 121-130 (1999)
4. Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325-339 (1967)
5. Hutter, M., Zaffalon, M.: Bayesian treatment of incomplete discrete data applied to mutual information and feature selection. In: Günter, A., Kruse, R., Neumann, B. (eds.) KI 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2821, pp. 396-406. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
6. Jiroušek, R.: On a conditional irrelevance relation for belief functions based on the operator of composition. In: Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G. (eds.) Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief, Proceedings of the Workshop at the 30th Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Fern Universität in Hagen, Osnabrück, pp. 28-41 (2007)
7. Jiroušek, R.: Factorization and Decomposable Models in Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. In: Workshop on the Theory of Belief Functions, Brest, France (2010)
8. Jiroušek, R., Vejnarová, J.: Compositional models and conditional independence in evidence theory. Accepted to Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.02.005
9. Jiroušek, R., Vejnarová, J., Daniel, M.: Compositional models of belief functions. In: de Cooman, G., Vejnarová, J., Zaffalon, M. (eds.) Proc. of the 5th Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Praha, pp. 243-252 (2007)
10. Jousselme, A.L., Maupin, P.: On some properties of distances in evidence theory. In: Workshop on the Theory of Belief Functions, Brest, France (2010)
11. Klir, G.J.: Uncertainty and Information. Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
12. Lauritzen, S.L.: Graphical models. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
13. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
14. Shenoy, P.P.: Conditional independence in valuation-based systems. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 10(3), 203-234 (1994)
15. Shenoy, P.P.: Binary join trees for computing marginals in the Shenoy-Shafer architecture. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 17(2-3), 239-263 (1997)
16. Studený, M.: Formal properties of conditional independence in different calculi of AI. In: Moral, S., Kruse, R., Clarke, E. (eds.) ECSQARU 1993. LNCS, vol. 747, pp. 341-351. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
17. Studený, M.: On stochastic conditional independence: the problems of characterization and description. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 35, 323-341 (2002)