Robotics in rehabilitation: Successes and expectations

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 95-96

  Fazekas, Gábor ^a,b  

^a National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation   (Hungary)

^b ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; PROCEDURES; STROKE;

HUMANS; REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84877576342     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: 14735660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32836195d1     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M (2007). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.
2. Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M (2012). Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.
3. Péter O, Fazekas G, Zsiga K, Dénes Z (2011). Robot mediated upper limb physiotherapy: review and recommendations for future clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res 34:196-202.
4. Puumalainen J (2011). Participation in community and political life of persons with severe disabilities. Int J Rehabil Res 34:274-281.
5. Sivan M, O'Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B (2011). Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med 43:181-189.
6. World Robotics (2012). Industrial Robots. Frankfurt Am Main: IFR Statistical Department, 8-18.