The treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater using in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 442, Issue , 2013, Pages 72-82

  Kaya, Yasemin ^a   Ersan, Gamze ^a   Vergili, Ilda ^a   Gönder, Z Beril ^a   Yilmaz, Gulsum ^a   Dizge, Nadir ^b   Aydiner, Coskun ^b  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Pharmaceutical wastewater; Resistance in series model; Sludge retention time; Submerged membrane bioreactor

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND REMOVALS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE (EPSS); FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRA RED (FTIR) SPECTROSCOPY; PHARMACEUTICAL ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER; RESISTANCE-IN-SERIES MODEL; SLUDGE RETENTION TIME; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTACT ANGLE; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; REMOVAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

BIOREACTORS;

ETODOLAC; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE; POLYMER; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE; BIOFOULING; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTINUOUS FLOW REACTOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG INDUSTRY; GEL; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROFILTRATION; PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SLUDGE; SLUDGE TREATMENT; STEADY STATE; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR SYSTEM; SURFACE PROPERTY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84877357157     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.059     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schroeder H.F. Substance-specific detection and pursuit of non-eliminable compounds during biological treatment of waste water from the pharmaceutical industry. Waste Manage. 1999, 19(2):111-123.
2. 2 processes. Chemosphere 2003, 50(1):85-95.
3. Baumgarten S., Schröder H.F., Charwath C., Lange M., Beier S., Pinnekamp J. Evaluation of advanced treatment technologies for the elimination of pharmaceutical compounds. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56(5):1-8.
4. Tekin H., Bilkaya O., Ataberk S.S., Balta T.H., Ceribasi H., Sanin F.D., Dilek F.B., Yetis U. Use of Fenton oxidation to improve the biodegradability of a pharmaceutical wastewater. J. Hazard Mater. 2006, 21:258-265.
5. Urase T., Kikuta T. Separate estimation of adsorption and degradation of pharmaceutical substances and estrogens in the activated sludge process. Water Res. 2005, 39(7):1289-1300.
6. Zhang J., Chuaa H.C., Zhoub J., Fane A.G. Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:54-66.
7. Stephenson T., Judd S., Jefferson B., Brindle K. Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment 2000, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
8. Yigit N.O., Harman I., Civelekoglu G., Koseoglu H., Cicek N., Kitis M. Membrane fouling in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor operated under various conditions. Desalination 2008, 231:124-132.
9. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
10. Liang S., Liu C., Song L. Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Res. 2007, 41:95-101.
11. Wang Z., Tang S., Zhu Y., Wu Z., Zhou Q., Yang D. Fluorescent dissolved organic matter variations in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355:151-157.
12. Visvanathan C., Ben Aim R, Parmeshwaran K. Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30(1):1-48.
13. Pollice A., Laera G., Saturno D., Giordano C. Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 317:65-70.
14. Radjenovicd́ J., Jelicd́ A., Petrovicd́ M., Barcelod́ D. Determination of pharmaceuticals in sewage sludge by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007.
15. Lesjean B., Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Jekel M., Gnirss R., Amy G. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Tech. 2005, 51(6-7):1-8.
16. Göbel A., McArdell C.S., Joss A., Siegrist H., Giger W. Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 372:361-371.
17. Kimura K., Hara H., Watanabe Y. Elimination of selected acidic pharmaceuticals from municipal wastewater by an activated sludge system and membrane bioreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:3708-3714.
18. Pérez S., Barceló D. First evidence for occurrence of hydroxylated human metabolites of diclofenac and aceclofenac in wastewater using QqLIT-MS and QqTOF-MS. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:8135-8145.
19. Clara M., Kreuzinger N., Strenn B., Gans O., Kroiss H. The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res. 2005, 39(1):97-106.
20. Huang X., Gui P., Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36(10):1001-1006.
21. Han S.S., Bae T.H., Jang G.G., Tak T.M. Influence of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and bioactivities in membrane bioreactor system. Process Biochem. 2005, 40(7):2393-2400.
22. Kaya Y., Barlas H., Arayici S. Evaluation of fouling mechanisms in the nanofiltration of solutions with high anionic and nonionic surfactant contents using a resistance-in-series model. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:45-54.
23. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., APHA/AWWA/WEF, Washington, DC, 1998.
24. Frolund B., Palmgren R., Keiding K., Nielsen P.H. Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res. 1996, 30(8):1749-1758.
25. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Membr. Sci. 1951, 193:265-275.
26. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Calorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28:350-356.
27. Kaya Y., Barlas H., Arayici S. Nanofiltration of Cleaning-in-Place (CIP) wastewater in a detergent plant: effects of pH, temperature and transmembrane pressure on flux behavior. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65(2):117-129.
28. Kaya Y., Gönder Z.B., Vergili I., Barlas H. The effect of transmembrane pressure and pH on treatment of paper machine process waters by using a two-step nanofiltration process: flux decline analysis. Desalination 2010, 250:150-157.
29. Lee Y., Clark M.M. Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 149:181-202.
30. Rahimi M., Madaeni S.S., Abbasi K. CFD modeling of permeate flux in cross-flow microfiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255(1/2):23-31.
31. Dizge N., Koseoglu-Imer D.Y., Karagunduz A., Keskinler B. Effects of cationic polyelectrolyte on filterability and fouling reduction of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 377:175-181.
32. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
33. Hernandez M.E.R., Van Kaam R., Schetrite S., Albasi C. Role and variations of supernatant compounds in submerged membrane bioreactor fouling. Desalination 2005, 179:95-107.
34. Lee W., Kang S., Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:217-227.
35. Badireddy1 A.R., Chellam S. Bismuth dimercaptopropanol (BisBAL) inhibits formation of multispecies wastewater flocs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110:1426-1437.