Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: A systematic review of the literature

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 886-892

  Johansson, Eva ^a   Hammarskjöld, Fredrik ^b,c   Lundberg, Dag ^d   Arnlind, Marianne Heibert ^a,e  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b RYHOV COUNTY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATHETER OCCLUSION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEVICE COMPARISON; ECONOMIC ASPECT; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); VEIN OCCLUSION;

CATHETER OBSTRUCTION; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; RISK FACTORS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

DALTEPARIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

EID: 84877347910     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.773072     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Polderman KH, G irbes A J . C entral venous catheter use. Part 1: Mechanical complications . Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1-17 .
2. Johansson E , E ngervall P , B jorvell H , H ast R , B jorkholm M . Patients ' perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia . Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 137-43 .
3. Hammarskjö l d F , N ielsen N , R öd jer S , P är sson H, Falkmer U , Malmvall BE. [Peripherally inserted central venous catheter still not evaluated for clinical use. More scientifi c support is needed according to a literature study] . L ä kartidningen. 2008; 105: 1576-80 .
4. Maki DG , K luger DM , C rnich CJ . T he risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: A systematic review of 200 published prospective studies . Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 1159-71 .
5. Oakley C, Wright E, Ream E . The experiences of patients and nurses with a nurse-led peripherally inserted central venous catheter line service . Eur J Oncol Nurs 2000; 4: 207-18 .
6. SBU . U tv är dering av metoder i h äl so-och sjukvå r den-En handbok . www.sbu.se/sv/Evidensbaserad-vard/Utvarderingav-metoder-i- halso-och-sjukvarden-En-handbok/2012.
7. Guyatt G H , O xman AD , V ist G E , K unz R , F alck-Ytter Y , Alonso-Coello P , et al . GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations . BMJ 2008; 336: 924-6 .
8. Schunemann HJ, O xman AD , B rozek J, G lasziou P , B ossuyt P , Chang S , et al . GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations . ACP J Club 2008; 149: 2 .
9. Bonizzoli M , B atacchi S , C ianchi G , Z agli G , L api F , Tucci V , et al . Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in postcritical patients . Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 284-9 .
10. Revel-Vilk S , Y acobovich J , T amary H , G oldstein G , Nemet S , Weintraub M , et al . Risk factors for central venous catheter thrombotic complications in children and adolescents with cancer . Cancer 2010; 116: 4197-205 .
11. Mollee P , J ones M , S tackelroth J, v an Kuilenburg R , Joubert W , Faoagali J , et al . Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: A prospective cohort study . J Hosp Infect 2011; 78: 26-30 .
12. Alonso-Echanove J , E dwards J R , R ichards M J , B rennan P , Venezia RA , Keen J , et al . Effect of nurse staffi ng and antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters on the risk for bloodstream infections in intensive care units . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24: 916-25 .
13. Cowl CT , W einstock JV , A l-Jurf A , E phgrave K, M urray JA , Dillon K . Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters . Clin Nutr 2000; 19: 237-43 .
14. Kim HJ, Y un J, K im KH, K im SH , L ee SC , B ae SB , et al . Safety and effectiveness of central venous catheterization in patients with cancer: Prospective observational study . J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 1748-53 .
15. Al Raiy B, F akih MG , B ryan-Nomides N , H opfner D , Riegel E , Nenninger T , et al . Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters . Am J Infect Control 2010; 38: 149-53 .
16. Duerksen DR , P apineau N , S iemens J, Y affe C. P eripherally inserted central catheters for parenteral nutrition: A comparison with centrally inserted catheters . JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1999; 23: 85-9 .
17. Giuffrida DJ , B ryan-Brown CW, L umb PD , K wun KB, Rhoades HM . Central vs peripheral venous catheters in critically ill patients . Chest 1986; 90: 806-9 .
18. Raad I , D avis S , B ecker M , H ohn D , H ouston D , U mphrey J , et al . Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for longterm venous access . Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 1791-6 .
19. Worth L J , S eymour JF, S lavin MA . I nfective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: Prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices . Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 811-8 .
20. Saber W , M oua T , W illiams E C, V erso M , A gnelli G , Couban S , et al . Risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: A patient-level data (IPD) metaanalysis of clinical trials and prospective studies . J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 312-9 .