The Thickness of Musical Pitch: Psychophysical Evidence for Linguistic Relativity

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 613-621

  Dolscheid, Sarah ^a,b   Shayan, Shakila ^a   Majid, Asifa ^a,c   Casasanto, Daniel ^a,c,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b Radboud University Nijmegen and International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

cross cultural differences; language; metaphor; music; musical pitch; psychophysics; space; Whorfian hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877337906     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457374     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashley R.Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Lipscomb P. W. S.Ashley R.Gjerdingen R., ed. Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions; 2004:64-71.
2. Boroditsky L.Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.Cognitive Psychology. 2001;43:1-22.
3. Casasanto D.Who is afraid of the big bad Whorf? Cross- linguistic differences in temporal language and thought.Language Learning. 2008;58:63-79.
4. Casasanto D.Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. Evans V.Chilton P., ed. London, England: Equinox; 2010:453-478.
5. Casasanto D.,Bottini R.Spatial cognition VI. Hölscher N. S.Shipley T. F.Olivetti Belardinelli M.Bateman J. A., ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010:335-345.
6. Casasanto D.,Chrysikou E. G.When left is "right": Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts.Psychological Science. 2011;22:419-422.
7. Dolscheid S.,Hunnius S.,Casasanto D.,Majid A.Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Miyake N.Peebles D.Cooper R. P., ed. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society; 2012:306-311.
8. Douglas K. M.,Bilkey D. K.Amusia is associated with deficits in spatial processing.Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10:915-921.
9. Eitan Z.,Timmers R.Beethoven's last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context.Cognition. 2010;114:405-422.
10. Fischer M. H.,Mills R. A.,Shaki S.How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations.Brain and Cognition. 2010;72:333-336.
11. Gennari S. P.,Sloman S.,Malt B. C.,Fitch W. T.Motion events in language and cognition.Cognition. 2002;83:49-79.
12. Gentner D.,Wolff P.Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Districh E.Marbnau A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000:295-342.
13. Lakoff G.,Johnson M.The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system.Cognitive Science. 1980;4:195-208.
14. Lakoff G.,Johnson M.Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1999:.
15. Lidji P.,Kolinsky R.,Lochy A.,Morais J.Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2007;33:1189-1207.
16. LupyanG. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Cognition, 3, 54. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Cognition/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054/full.
17. Miller R.The structure of singing: System and art of vocal technique. New York, NY: Schirmer Books; 1986:.
18. Papafragou A.,Hulbert J.,Trueswell J.Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements.Cognition. 2008;108:155-184.
19. Pinker S.How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton; 1997:.
20. Rusconi E.,Kwan B.,Giordano B. L.,Umiltà C.,Butterworth B.Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect.Cognition. 2006;99:113-129.
21. Shayan S.,Ozturk O.,Bowerman M.,Majid A.Spatial metaphor in language can promote the development of cross-modal mappings in children. 2012;:.
22. Shayan S.,Ozturk O.,Sicoli M.The thickness of pitch: Cross-modal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish and Zapotec.The Senses & Society. 2011;6:19-29.
23. Slobin D. I.Rethinking linguistic relativity. Gumperz J. J.Levinson S. C., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1996:70-96.
24. Stone R. M.Toward a Kpelle conceptualization of music performance.Journal of African Folklore. 1981;94:188-206.
25. TillmannB.JolicoeurP.IshiharaM.GosselinN.BertrandO.RossettiY.PeretzI. (2010). The amusic brain: Lost in music, but not in space. PLoS ONE, 5, e10173. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0010173.
26. Wagner S.,Winner E.,Cicchetti D.,Gardner H."Metaphorical" mapping in human infants.Child Development. 1981;52:728-731.
27. Walker P.,Bremner J. G.,Mason U.,Spring J.,Mattock K.,Slater A.,Johnson P.Preverbal infants' sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences.Psychological Science. 2010;21:21-25.
28. Winawer J.,Witthoft N.,Frank M.,Wu L.,Wade A.,Boroditsky L.Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2007;19:7780-7785.