"Nudging" and Informed Consent Revisited: Why "Nudging" Fails in the Clinical Context

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 29-31

  Holm, Søren ^a,b   Ploug, Thomas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FREEDOM; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;

BENEFICENCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COERCION; COMPREHENSION; FREEDOM; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84877285110     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.781713     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Cohen, S. 2013. Nudging and informed consent. American Journal of Bioethics, 13 (6) 3-11
2. Mitchell, G. 2005. Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review, 99 (3): 1245 - 1277.
3. Ploug, T., Holm, S. and Brodersen, J. 2012. To nudge or not to nudge: Cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66: 1193 - 1196.
4. Sunstein, C. R. and Thaler, R. H. 2003. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70 (4): 1159 - 1202.