Identifying soil patterns at different spatial scales with a multi-receiver EMI sensor soil physics

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 382-390

  Saey, Timothy ^a   De Smedt, Philippe ^a   De Clercq, Wim ^a   Meerschman, Eef ^a   Islam, Mohammad Monirul ^a   Van Meirvenne, Marc ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPARENT ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION SENSORS; INVERSION PROCEDURE; MEASUREMENTS OF; SMALL-SCALE FEATURES; SOIL COMPOSITION; SOIL VARIABILITIES; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; SENSORS; SOIL MECHANICS; SOILS;

SOIL SURVEYS;

AERIAL SURVEY; ARCHAEOLOGY; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MEASUREMENT METHOD; SOIL TYPE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 84877282504     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: 14350661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0276     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ameryckx, J., editor. 1962. Bodemkaart van Belgie, Verklarende tekst bij het kaartblad Maldegem 24W. Centrum voor Bodemkartering, Gent, Belgium.
2. Beamish, D. 2011. Low induction number, ground conductivity meters: A correction procedure in the absence of magnetic effects. J. Appl. Geophys. 75:244-253. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.07.005.
3. Borchers, B., T. Uram, and J.M.H. Hendrickx. 1997. Tikhonov regularization of electrical conductivity depth profiles in field soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1004-1009. doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040002x.
4. Brevik, E.C., T.E. Fenton, and A. Lazari. 2006. Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precis. Agric. 7:393-404. doi:10.1007/s11119-006-9021-x.
5. Callegary, J.B., T.P.A. Ferre, and R.W. Groom. 2007. Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic- induction instruments. Vadose Zone J. 6:158-167. doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0120.
6. Carroll, Z.L., and M.A. Oliver. 2005. Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 128:354-374. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.008.
7. Cook, P.G., and G.R. Walker. 1992. Depth profiles of electrical conductivity from linear combinations of electromagnetic induction measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:1015-1022. doi:10.2136/sssaj1992. 03615995005600040003x.
8. Corwin, D.L., and J.D. Rhoades. 1982. An improved technique for determining soil electrical conductivity-depth relations from aboveground electromagnetic measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:517-520. doi:10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600030014x.
9. De Clercq, W., P. De Smedt, J. De Reu, D. Herremans, P. Masters, T. Saey, B. Stichelbaut, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2012. Towards an integrated methodology for assessing rural settlement landscapes in the Belgian lowlands. Archaeol. Prospect. 19:141-145. doi:10.1002/arp.1418.
10. Doolittle, J.A., K.A. Sudduth, N.R. Kitchen, and S.J. Indorante. 1994. Estimating depth to clays using electromagnetic induction methods. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49:572-575.
11. Frohlich Gugler, A.I.M., and P. Gex. 1996. Electromagnetic survey of a Celtic tumulus. J. Appl. Geophys. 35:15-25. doi:10.1016/0926-9851(96)00024-9.
12. Heilig, J., J. Kempenich, J. Doolittle, E.C. Brevik, and M. Ulmer. 2011. Evaluation of electromagnetic induction to characterize and map sodium-affected soils in the northern Great Plains. Soil Surv. Horiz. 52:77-88.
13. Hendrickx, J.M.H., B. Borchers, D.L. Corwin, S.M. Lesch, A.C. Hilgendorf, and J. Schlue. 2002. Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:673-685. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.0673.
14. Inman, D.J., R.S. Freeland, J.T. Ammons, and R.E. Yoder. 2002. Soil investigations using electromagnetic induction and ground-penetrating radar in southwest Tennessee. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:206-211. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002. 0206.
15. Luck, E., J. Callmer, and T. Skanberg. 2003. The house of the Bailiff of Sovestad, Sweden- a multi-method geophysical case-study. Archaeol. Prospect. 10:143-151. doi:10.1002/arp.210.
16. Marquardt, D. 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11:431-441. doi:10.1137/0111030.
17. McCutcheon, M.C., H.J. Farahani, J.D. Stednick, G.W. Buchleiter, and T.R. Green. 2006. Effect of soil water on apparent soil electrical conductivity and texture relationships in a dryland field. Biosystems Eng. 94:19-32. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.01.002.
18. McNeill, J.D. 1980. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Technical Note TN-6. Geonics Limited, Missisauga, Ontario, Canada.
19. Meerschman, E., M. Van Meirvenne, P. De Smedt, T. Saey, M.M. Islam, F. Meeuws, E. Van De Vijver, and G. Ghysels. 2011. Imaging a polygonal network of ice-wedge casts with an electromagnetic induction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75:1-6. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0216.
20. Mester, A., J. van der Kruk, E. Zimmermann, and H. Vereecken. 2011. Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurements. Vadose Zone J. 10:1319-1330. doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0035.
21. Minasny, B., and A.B. McBratney. 2006. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput. Geosci. 32:1378-1388. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2005.12.009.
22. Monteiro Santos, F.A., J. Triantafilis, K.E. Bruzgulis, and J.A.E. Roe. 2010. Inversion of multiconfiguration electromagnetic (DUALEM-421) profiling data using a one-dimensional laterally constrained algorithm. Vadose Zone J. 9:117-125. doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0088.
23. Persson, K., and B. Olofsson. 2004. Inside a mount: Applied geophysics in archaeological prospecting at the Kings' Mounds, Gamla Uppsala, Sweden. J. Archaeol. Sci. 31:551-562. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.003.
24. Rhoades, J.D., and D.L. Corwin. 1981. Determining soil electrical conductivity-depth relations using an inductive electromagnetic soil conductivity meter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:255-260. doi:10.2136/sssaj1981. 03615995004500020006x.
25. Rhoades, J.D., S.M. Lesch, P.J. Shouse, and W.J. Alves. 1989. New calibrations for determining soil electrical conductivity-Depth relations from electromagnetic measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:74-79. doi:10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300010014x.
26. Robinson, D.A., H. Abdu, I. Lebron, and S.B. Jones. 2012. Imaging of hill-slope soil moisture wetting patterns in a semi-arid oak savanna catchment using time-lapse electromagnetic induction. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 416- 417:39-49. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.034.
27. Saey, T., P. De Smedt, E. Meerschman, M.M. Islam, F. Meeuws, E. Van De Vijver, A. Lehouck, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2012a. Electrical conductivity depth modeling with a multireceiver EMI sensor for prospecting archaeological features. Archaeol. Prospect. 19:21-30. doi:10.1002/arp.425.
28. Saey, T., M.M. Islam, P. De Smedt, E. Meerschman, F. Meeuws, E. Van De Vijver, A. Lehouck, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2012b. Using a multi-receiver survey of apparent electrical conductivity to reconstruct a Holocene tidal channel in a polder area. Catena 95:104-111. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.001.
29. Saey, T., D. Simpson, H. Vermeersch, L. Cockx, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2009a. Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM-21S sensors for depth-to-clay mapping. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73:7-12. doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0079.
30. Saey, T., D. Simpson, U. Vitharana, H. Vermeersch, J. Vermang, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2008. Reconstructing the paleotopography beneath the loess cover with the aid of an electromagnetic induction sensor. Catena 74:58- 64. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.03.007.
31. Saey, T., M. Van Meirvenne, H. Vermeersch, N. Ameloot, and L. Cockx. 2009b. A pedotransfer function to evaluate the soil profile textural heterogeneity using proximally sensed apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 150:389-395. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.024.
32. Santos, V.R.N., J.L. Porsani, C.A. Mendonca, S.L. Rodrigues, and P.D. DeBlasis. 2009. Reduction of topography effect in inductive electromagnetic profiles: Application on coastal sambaqui (shell mound) archaeological site in Santa Catarina state, Brazil. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36:2089-2095. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.014.
33. Slavich, P.G. 1990. Determining ECa-depth profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements. Aust. J. Soil Res. 28:443-452. doi:10.1071/SR9900443.
34. Tromp-van Meerveld, H.J., and J.J. McDonnell. 2009. Assessment of multifrequency electromagnetic induction for determining soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale. J. Hydrol. 368:56-67. doi:10.1016/j. jhydrol.2009.01.037.
35. Venter, M.L., V.D. Thompson, M.D. Reynolds, and J.C. Waggoner Jr. 2006. Integrating shallow geophysical survey: Archeological investigations at Totogal in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33:767-777. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.008.
36. Vitharana, U.W.A., T. Saey, L. Cockx, D. Simpson, H. Vermeersch, and M. Van Meirvenne. 2008. Upgrading a 1/20, 000 soil map with an apparent electrical conductivity survey. Geoderma 148:107-112. doi:10.1016/j. geoderma.2008.09.013.
37. Wait, J.R. 1962. A note on the electromagnetic response of a stratified earth. Geophysics 27:382-385. doi:10.1190/1.1439028.