Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?

Nature Methods

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 373-

  Jonker, Rudy M ^a   Guenther, Anja ^a   Engqvist, Leif ^a   Schmoll, Tim ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDITY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMALS; FEMALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84877278071     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2439     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Richter, S.H. et al. PLoS ONE 6, e16461 (2011).
2. Richter, S.H., Garner, J.P., Auer, C., Kunert, J. & Würbel, H. Nat. Methods 7, 167-168 (2010).
3. Hurlbert, S.H. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187-211 (1984).
4. Wolf, M. & Weissing, F.J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 452-461 (2012).
5. Lewejohann, L., Zipser, B. & Sachser, N. Dev. Psychobiol. 53, 624-630 (2011).
6. Schumann, D.E.W. & Bradley, R.A. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 902-920 (1957).
7. Richter, S.H. et al. PLoS ONE 6, e16461 (2011).
8. Richter, S.H., Garner, J.P. & Würbel, H. Nat. Methods 6, 257-261 (2009).
9. van der Staay, F.J., Arndt, S.S. & Nordquist, R.E. Genes Brain Behav. 9, 849-855 (2010).