Strong ground motion in the 2011 Tohoku earthquake: A one-directional three-component modeling

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 103, Issue 2 B, 2013, Pages 1394-1410

  Santisi d'Avila, Maria Paola ^a   Semblat, Jean François ^b   Lenti, Luca ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKES; CYCLIC PLASTICITY MODELS; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; MEASURED PARAMETERS; SPECTRAL AMPLITUDE; STRONG GROUND MOTION; SURFACE GROUND MOTION; WAVE PROPAGATION MODELS;

AMPLIFICATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOLOGIC MODELS; LOADING; POLARIZATION; RHEOLOGY; SOILS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EARTHQUAKES;

AMPLIFICATION; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND MOTION; POLARIZATION; RHEOLOGY; SOIL PROFILE; SOIL STRENGTH; STRONG MOTION; TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE 2011; WAVE FIELD;

EID: 84877256081     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: 19433573     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120120208     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bardet, J. P., and T. Tobita (2001). NERA: A Computer Program for Nonlinear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits, University of Southern California, California.
2. Bardet, J. P., K. Ichii, and C. H. Lin (2000). EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits, University of Southern California, California.
3. Bertotti, G., and I. Mayergoyz (2006). The Science of Hysteresis: Mathematical Modeling and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1-114.
4. Bonilla, L. F., J. H. Steidl, J. C. Gariel, and R. J. Archuleta (2002). Borehole response studies at the Garner Valley downhole array, Southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 3165-3179.
5. Bonilla, L. F., K. Tsuda, N. Pulido, J. Régnier, and A. Laurendeau (2011). Nonlinear site response evidence of K-Net and KiK-Net records from the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space 63, 785-789.
6. Crisfield, M. A. (1991). Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 8-55.
7. De Martin, F., H. Kawase, and A. Modaressi (2010). Nonlinear soil response of a borehole station based on one-dimensional inversion during the 2005 West off Fukuoka Prefecture earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 151-171.
8. Fahey, M. (1992). Shear modulus of cohesionless soil: Variation with stress and strain level, Can. Geotech. J. 29, 157-161.
9. Fung, Y. C. (1965). Foundation of Soil Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 127-152.
10. Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich (1972a). Shear modulus and damping in soil: Measurement and parameter effects, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98, 603-624.
11. Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich (1972b). Shear modulus and damping in soil: Design equations and curves, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98, 667-692.
12. Hilber, H. M., T. J. R. Hughes, and R. L. Taylor (1977). Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5, 283-292.
13. Hsu, C. C., and M. Vucetic (2004). Volumetric threshold shear strain for cyclic settlement, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130, no. 1, 58-70.
14. Hsu, C. C., and M. Vucetic (2006). Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132, no. 10, 1325-1335.
15. Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The Finite Element Method-Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 490-567.
16. Ishihara, K. (1996). Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics, Clarenton Press, Oxford, England, 127-151.
17. Iwan, W. D. (1967). On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems, J. Appl. Mech. 34, 612-617.
18. Joyner, W. (1975). A method for calculating nonlinear seismic response in two dimensions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, no. 5, 1337-1357.
19. Joyner, W. B., and A. T. F. Chen (1975). Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, no. 5, 1315-1336.
20. Kim, T. C., and M. Novak (1981). Dynamic properties of some cohesive soils of Ontario, Can. Geotech. J. 18, 371-389.
21. Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 231-248.
22. Kuhlemeyer, R. L., and J. Lysmer (1973). Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 99, no. SM5, 421-427.
23. Lee, K. W., and W. D. L. Finn (1978). DESRA-2: Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential, in Soil Mechanics Series, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
24. Lefebvre, G. S., D. Leboeuf, and B. Demers (1989). Stability threshold for cyclic loading of staured clay, Can. Geotech. J. 26, 122-131.
25. Lenti, L. (2006). Modellazione di effetti non lineari in terreni soggetti a carico ciclico e dinamico (Modeling of nonlinear effects in soils for cyclic and dynamic loading), Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum.
26. Li, X. S. (1990). Free field response under multidirectional earthquake loading, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis, California.
27. Li, X. S., Z. L. Wang, and C. K. Shen (1992). SUMDES: A Nonlinear Procedure for Response Analysis of Horizontally-Layered Sites Subjected to Multi-Directional Earthquake Loading, University of California, Davis, California.
28. Mestat, P. (1993). Lois de comportement des géomatériaux et modélisation par la méthode des éléments finis, in Etudes et recherches des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, Geotechnical Series, GT52, Paris, France.
29. Mestat, P. (1998). Modèles d'éléments finis et problèmes de convergence en comportement non linéaire, Bull. Lab. Ponts Chaussées 214, 45-60.
30. Newmark, N. M. (1959). A method of computation for structural dynamics, J. Eng. Mech. 85, no. EM3, 67-94.
31. Oppenheim, A. V., A. S. Willsky, and S. H. Nawab (1997). Signals and Systems, Second Ed., Prentice Hall, 53-56.
32. Santisi d'Avila, M. P., L. Lenti, and J. F. Semblat (2012). Modeling strong seismic ground motion: 3D loading path vs wavefield polarization, Geophys. J. Int. 190, 1607-1624.
33. Satoh, T., H. Kawase, and T. Sato (1995). Evaluation of local site effects and their removal from borehole records observed in the Sendai region, Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1770-1789.
34. Schnabel, P. B., J. Lysmer, and H. B. Seed (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report UCB/EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
35. Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss (1970a). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, Report UCB/EERC-70/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
36. Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss (1970b). Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle, during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 60, 125-136.
37. Seed, H. B., and J. I. Sun (1989). Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985 for Earthquake-Resistant Design Criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, Report UCB/EERC-89/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
38. Seed, H. B., R. T. Wong, I. M. Idriss, and K. Tokimatsu (1986). Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils, Report UCB/EERC-84/14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
39. Segalman, D. J., and M. J. Starr (2008). Inversion of Masing models via continuous Iwan systems, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 43, 74-80.
40. Semblat, J. F., and J. J. Brioist (2000). Efficiency of higher order finite elements for the analysis of seismic wave propagation, J. Sound Vibrat. 231, no. 2, 460-467.
41. Sun, J. I., R. Golesorkhi, and H. B. Seed (1988). Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils, Report UCB/EERC-88/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
42. Vucetic, M. (1994). Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils, J. Geotech. Eng. 120, no. 12, 2208-2228.
43. Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, J. Geotech. Eng. 117, no. 1, 89-107.
44. Wang, Z. L., Y. F. Dafalias, and C. K. Shen (1990). Bounding surface hypoelasticity model for sand, J. Eng. Mech. 116, no. 5, 983-1001.
45. Zambelli, C., C. Di Prisco, A. D'Onofrio, C. Visone, and F. Santucci de Magistris (2006). Dependency of the mechanical behavior of granular soils on loading frequency: Experimental results and constitutive modelling, in Soil Stress-Strain Behavior: Measurement, Modeling and Analysis, A collection of papers of the Geotechnical Symposium in Roma, 16-17 March, 2006, 567-582.