Virtual abutment design: A concept for delivery of CAD/CAM customized abutments-report of a retrospective cohort

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 51-58

  Parpaiola, Andrea ^a,b   Norton, Michael R ^c   Cecchinato, Denis ^b   Bressan, Eriberto ^a   Toia, Marco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b Institute Franci   (Italy)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; METAL CERAMIC ALLOY; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; ALLOY;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION; DENTURE DESIGN; FEMALE; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY;

COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MALE; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84877251354     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1272     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 466-471.
2. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 374-377.
3. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 378-384.
4. Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Different CAD/ CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: Influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 527-536.
5. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Galluci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(suppl): 110-117.
6. Henriksson K, Jemt T. Evaluation of custom-made Procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: A prospective 1-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 626-630.
7. Canullo L. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for singleimplant restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 489-493.
8. Lang LA, Sierraalta M, Hoffensperger M, Wang RF. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 652-658.
9. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina Procera abutments with hexagonal connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 575-580.
10. Garine WN, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Wodenscheck J, Murphy WC. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implantabutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 928-938.
11. Yüzügüllü B, Avci M. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 113-121.
12. Baixe S, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Etienne O. Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 455-460.
13. Kerstein RB, Radke J. A comparison of fabrication precision and mechanical reliability of 2 zirconia implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1029-1036.
14. Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA. Examination of the implantabutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 268-275.
15. Nguyen HQ, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 636-646.
16. Kim S, Kim HI, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 226-230.
17. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 850-858.
18. Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J. Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments. Comp Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 793-801.
19. Schneider A, Kurtzman GM. Computerized milled solid implant abutments utilized at second stage surgery. Gen Dent 2001; 49: 416-420.
20. Garg AK. The Atlantis components abutment: Simplifying the tooth implant procedure. Dent Implantol Update 2002; 13: 65-70.
21. Sesemann MR. A visual essay. Maxillary arch reconstruction utilizing CAD/CAM Atlantis abutments. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008; 20: 397-399.
22. Elian N, Tabourian G, Jalbout ZN, et al. Accurate transfer of peri-implant soft tissue emergence profile from the provisional crown to the final prosthesis using an emergence profile cast. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 306-314.
23. Shor A, Schuler R, Goto Y. Indirect implant-supported fixed provisional restoration in the esthetic zone: Fabrication technique and treatment workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 82-95.
24. Spyropoulou PE, Razzoog M, Sierraalta M. Restoring implants in the esthetic zone after sculpting and capturing the periimplant tissues in rest position: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 345-347.
25. Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CS. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 295-302.
26. Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 378-384.
27. Al-Rabab’ah MA, Macfarlane TV, Mc-Cord JF. Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008; 16: 109-115.
28. Witlowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 47-52.