Dynamic key frame presentation techniques for augmenting video browsing

Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 185-194

  Tse, Tony ^a   Marchionini, Gary ^a   Ding, Wei ^a   Slaughter, Laura ^a   Komlodi, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Display rate; Divided attention; Dynamic displays; Interface design; Key frames; Representations; Video browsing

Indexed keywords

DIVIDED ATTENTION; DYNAMIC DISPLAYS; INTERFACE DESIGNS; KEY FRAMES; REPRESENTATIONS; VIDEO BROWSING;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 84877250692     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/948496.948522     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Beauchemin, S.S. and J.L. Barron. (1995). The computation of optical flow. ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3): 433-466.
2. Boyce, S.J., A. Pollatsek, and K. Rayner. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3): 556-566.
3. Christel, M.G., D.B. Winkler, and CR. Taylor. (1997). Improving access to a digital video library. In Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT97, Sydney Australia.
4. Ding, W., G. Marchionini, and T. Tse. (1997). Previewing video data: Browsing key frames at high rates using a video slide show interface. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development, and Practice in Digital Libraries (ISDL '97), Tsukuba, Japaa
5. Ellis, H.C. and R.R. Hunt. (1989). Fundamentals of human memory and cognition. Wm. C. Brown Publishers: Dubuque, IA.
6. Elliot, E. (1993). Watch, grab, arrange, see: Thinking with motion images via streams and collages. MSVS Thesis Document. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Lab.
7. Healey, C.G., K.S. Booth, and J.T. Enns. (1996). Highspeed visual estimation using pre-attentive processing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2), 107-135.
8. Komlodi, A. (1997). Visual surrogates for motion picture documents: Presentation techniques for key frames. CLIS-TR-97-15, College Park, MD: Digital Library Research Group (http://www.glue.umd.edu/~dlrg/).
9. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge Series on Human Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press: New York.
10. O'Connor, B.C. (1991). Selecting key frames of moving image documents: A digital environment for analysis and navigation. Microcomputers for Information Management, 8(2), 119-133.
11. Potter, M.C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 509-522.
12. Slaughter, L., B. Shneiderman, and G. Marchionini. (1997). Comprehension and object recognition capabilities for presentations of simultaneous video key frame surrogates. In Peters C. and C Thanos (Eds), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: Proceedings of the First European Conference (pp. 41-54). ECDL'97, Pisa, Italy.
13. Teodosio, L. and W. Bender. (1993). Salient stills from video. Proceedings of ACM Mulitmedia '93, Anaheim, CA: 39-46.
14. Watclar, H.D., T. Kanade, M.A. Smith, and S.M. Stevens. (1996). Intelligent access to digital video: Informedia project. Computer, 29(5), 46-52.
15. Wickens, CD. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. Second Edition. New York: HarperCollins.
16. Yeung, MM, B.L. Yeo, W. Wolf, and B. Liu. (1995). Video browsing using clustering and scene transition on compressed sequences. Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking, San Jose.
17. Yow, D, B.L. Yeo, M.M. Yeung, and B. Liu. (1995). Analysis and presentation of soccer highlights from digital video. Proceedings of the Second Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV '95).
18. Zhang, HJ., C.Y. Low, and S.W. Smoliar. (1995). Video parsing and browsing using compressed data. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1, 89-111.