A comparison of 1701 snow models using observations from an alpine site

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 55, Issue , 2013, Pages 131-148

  Essery, Richard ^a   Morin, Samuel ^b   Lejeune, Yves ^b   B Ménard, Cécile ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Ensemble modelling; Model selection; Snow modelling; Snow processes

Indexed keywords

MODEL COMPLEXITY; MODEL CONFIGURATION; MODEL SELECTION; PARAMETER VALUES; PHYSICAL PROCESS; SINGLE MODELS; SNOW PROCESS; SURFACE TEMPERATURES;

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; DIGITAL STORAGE; MODELS; SNOW; SOLAR RADIATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ALBEDO; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; ERROR ANALYSIS; MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; SNOW;

FRANCE;

EID: 84877149104     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Albert M., Krajeski G. A fast, physically based point snowmelt model for use in distributed applications. Hydrol Processes 1998, 12:1809-1824.
2. Albert M., Koh G., Perron F. Radar investigations of melt pathways in a natural snowpack. Hydrol Processes 1999, 13:2991-3000.
3. Anderson EA. A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover. NOAA Technical Report NWS 19, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, 1976.
4. Andreadis K.M., Storck P., Lettenmaier D.P. Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments. Water Resour Res 2009, 45. 10.1029/2008WR007042.
5. Andreas E.L. Parameterizing scalar transfer over snow and ice: a review. J Hydrometeorol 2002, 3:417-432.
6. Bartelt P., Lehning M. A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning: Part I: numerical model. Cold Reg Sci Technol 2002, 35:123-145.
7. Bartlett P.A., MacKay M.D., Verseghy D.L. Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian land surface scheme: model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands. Atmos-Ocean 2006, 44:207-222.
8. Best M.J., et al. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description. Part 1: energy and water fluxes. Geosci Model Dev 2011, 4:677-699.
9. Bohn T.J., Sonessa M.Y., Lettenmaier D.P. Seasonal hydrologic forecasting: do multi-model ensemble averages always yield improvements in forecast skill?. J Hydrometeorol 2010, 11:1358-1372.
10. Boone A., Etchevers P. An intercomparison of three snow schemes of varying complexity coupled to the same land surface model: local-scale evaluation at an alpine site. J Hydrometeorol 2001, 2:374-394.
11. Boone A. Description du schema de neige ISBA-ES (Explicit Snow). Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, Toulouse, 2002. Available from: http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/IMG/pdf/snowdoc.pdf.
12. Boone A., et al. The Rhône-aggregation land surface scheme intercomparison project: an overview. J Clim 2004, 17:187-208.
13. Bowling L.C., et al. Simulation of high latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2e. 1: experiment design and summary intercomparisons. Global Planet Change 2003, 38:1-30.
14. Brasnett B. A global analysis of snow depth for numerical weather prediction. J Appl Meteorol 1999, 38:726-740.
15. Brown R., Bartlett P., MacKay M., Verseghy D. Evaluation of snow cover in CLASS for SnowMIP. Atmos-Ocean 2006, 44:223-238.
16. Brun E., David P., Sudul M., Brunot G. A numerical model to simulate snow-cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting. J Glaciol 1992, 38:13-22.
17. Calonne N., Flin F., Morin S., Lesaffre B., Rolland du Roscoat S., Geindreau C. Numerical and experimental investigations of the effective thermal conductivity of snow. Geophys Res Lett 2011, 38. 10.1029/2011GL049234.
18. Clark M.P., Slater A.G., Rupp D.E., Woods R.A., Vrugt J.A., Gupta H.V., et al. Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): a modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models. Water Resour Res 2008, 44. 10.1029/2007WR006735.
19. Clark M.P., Kavetski D. Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modelling: 1. Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes. Water Resour Res 2010, 46. 10.1029/2009WR008894.
20. Clark M.P., Kavetski D., Fenicia F. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resour Res 2011, 47. 10.1029/2010WR009827.
21. Clark M.P., Hendrikx J., Slater A.G., Kavetski D., Anderson B., Cullen N.J., et al. Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and land-surface models: a review. Water Resour Res 2011, 47. 10.1029/2011WR010745.
22. Colbeck S. Theory of water percolation in snow. J Glaciol 1972, 11:369-385.
23. Cox P.M., Betts R.A., Bunton C., Essery R.L.H., Rowntree P.R., Smith J. The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Clim Dyn 1999, 15:183-203.
24. Cox G.M., Gibbons J.M., Wood A.T.A., Craigon J., Ramsden S.J., Crout N.M.J. Towards the systematic simplification of mechanistic models. Ecol Mod 2006, 198:240-246.
25. Crank J., Nicolson P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat conduction type. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 1947, 43:50-67.
26. Dai Y., Zeng Q. A land surface model (IAP94) for climate studies. Part I: formulation and validation in off-line experiments. Adv Atmos Sci 1997, 14:433-460.
27. Derbyshire S.H. Boundary-layer decoupling over cold surfaces as a physical boundary-instability. Bound-Layer Meteor 1999, 90:297-325.
28. Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ) Modellbetreuungsgruppe. The ECHAM3 atmospheric general circulation model. DKRZ Technical Report No. 6, ISSN 0940-9237, Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany, 1992.
29. Dickinson RE, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy PJ. Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-387+STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO., 1993.
30. Dirmeyer P.A., Gao X., Zhao M., Guo Z., Oki T., Hanasaki N. GSWP-2: multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 87:1381-1397.
31. Donald J.R., Soulis E.D., Kouwen N., Pietroniro A. A land cover-based snow cover representation for distributed hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 1995, 31:995-1009.
32. Douville H., Royer J.F., Mahfouf J.F. A new snow parameterization for the Meteo-France climate model. Part I: validation in stand-alone experiments. Clim Dyn 1995, 12:21-35.
33. Drusch M., Vasiljevic D., Viterbo P. ECMWF's global snow analysis: assessment and revision based on satellite observations. J Appl Meteorol 2004, 43:1282-1294.
34. Dutra E., Balsamo G., Viterbo P., Miranda P.M.A., Beljaars A., Schär C., et al. An improved snow scheme for the ECMWF land surface model: description and offline validation. J Hydrometeorol 2010, 11:899-916.
35. Dutra E., Viterbo P., Miranda P.M.A., Balsamo G. Complexity of snow schemes in a climate model and its impact on surface energy and hydrology. J Hydrometeorol 2011, 10.1175/JHM-D-11-072.1.
36. Essery R., Martin E., Douville H., Fernández A., Brun E. A comparison of four snow models using observations from an alpine site. Clim Dyn 1999, 15:583-593.
37. Essery R., Li L., Pomeroy J. A distributed model of blowing snow over complex terrain. Hydrol Processes 1999, 13:2423-2438.
38. Essery R., Etchevers P. Parameter sensitivity in simulations of snowmelt. J Geophys Res 2004, 109. 10.1029/2004JD005036.
39. Essery R., Pomeroy J. Implications of spatial distributions of snow mass and melt rate for snow-cover depletion: Theoretical considerations. Ann Glaciol 2004, 38:261-265.
40. Essery R.L.H., Blyth E.M., Harding R.J., Lloyd C.M. Modelling albedo and distributed snowmelt across a low hill on Svalbard. Nordic Hydrol 2005, 36:207-218.
41. Essery R., Rutter N., Pomeroy J., Baxter R., Stähli M., Gustafsson D., et al. SnowMIP2: an evaluation of forest snow process simulations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90. 10.1175/2009BAMS2629.1.
42. Etchevers P., et al. Validation of the surface energy budget simulated by several snow models. Ann Glaciol 2004, 38:150-158.
43. Fassnacht S.R., Soulis E.D. Implications during transitional periods of improvements to the snow processes in the land surface scheme - hydrological model WATCLASS. Atmos-Ocean 2002, 40:389-403.
44. Feng X., Sahoo A., Arsenault K., Houser P., Luo P., Troy T.J. The impact of snow model complexity at three CLPX sites. J Hydrometeorol 2008, 9:1464-1481.
45. Flanner M.G., Zender C.S. Snowpack radiative heating: influence on Tibetan Plateau climate. Geophys Res Lett 2005, 32. 10.1029/2004GL022076.
46. Flanner M.G., Zender C.S. Linking snowpack microphysics and albedo evolution. J Geophys Res 2006, 111. 10.1029/2005JD006834.
47. Forland E, Allerup P, Dahlström B, Elomaa ET, Perälä J, Rissanen P, Vedin H, Vejen F. Manual for operational correction of Nordic precipitation data. Tech. rep., Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt 1996.
48. Franz K.J., Butcher P., Ajami N.K. Addressing snow model uncertainty for hydrologic prediction. Adv Water Resour 2010, 33:820-832.
49. Frei A., Miller J.A., Robinson D.A. Improved simulations of snow extent in the second phase of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-2). J Geophys Res 2003, 108. 10.1029/2002JD003030.
50. Green R.O., Dozier J., Roberts D., Painter T. Spectral snow-reflectance models for grain-size and liquid water fraction in melting snow for the solar-reflected spectrum. Ann Glaciol 2002, 34:71-73.
51. Guo Z., Dirmeyer P.A., Gao X., Zhao M. Improving the quality of simulated soil moisture with a multi-model ensemble approach. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 2007, 133:731-747.
52. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Yapo P.O. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncomensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 1998, 34:751-763.
53. Gusev Y.M., Nasonova O.N. The land surface parameterization scheme SWAP: description and partial validation. Global Planet Change 1998, 19:63-86.
54. Gustafsson D., Waldner P.A., Stähli M. Factors governing the formation and persistence of layers in a subalpine snowpack. Hydrol Processes 2004, 18:1165-1183.
55. Haddeland I., et al. Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. J Hydrometeorol 2011, 12. 10.1175/2011JHM1324.1.
56. Hedstrom N.R., Pomeroy J.W. Measurement and modelling of snow interception in the boreal forest. Hydrol Processes 1998, 12:1611-1625.
57. Helgason W., Pomeroy J. Characteristics of the near-surface boundary layer within a mountain valley during winter. J Appl Meteor Climatol 2011, 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-058.1.
58. Hirashima H., Yamaguchi S., Sati A., Lehning M. Numerical modeling of liquid water movement through layered snow based on new measurements of the water retention curve. Cold Reg Sci Technol 2010, 64:94-103.
59. Jin J., Gao X., Yang Z.L., Bales R.C., Sorooshian S., Dickinson R.E., et al. Comparative analyses of physically based snowmelt models for climate simulations. J Clim 1999, 12:2643-2657.
60. Jordan R. A one-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover. Technical documentation for SNTHERM.89. CRREL Special Report 91-16; US Army Core of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, 1991.
61. Kodama M. Continuous monitoring of snow water equivalent using cosmic ray neutrons. Cold Reg Sci Technol 1980, 3:295-303.
62. Kokhanovsky A.A., Zege E.P. Scattering optics of snow. Appl Opt 2004, 43:1589-1602.
63. Lehning M., Bartelt P., Brown B., Fierz C., Satyawali P. A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part II: snow microstructure. Cold Reg Sci Technol 2002, 35:147-167.
64. Lehning M., Volksch I., Gustafsson D., Nguyen T.A., Stähli M., Zappa M. ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology. Hydrol Processes 2006, 20:2111-2128.
65. Liston G.E., Sturm M. A snow-transport model for complex terrain. J Glaciol 1998, 44:498-516.
66. Liston G.E. Representing subgrid snow cover heterogeneities in regional and global models. J Clim 2004, 17:1381-1397.
67. Louis J.F. A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound-Layer Meteor 1979, 17:187-202.
68. Lynch-Stieglitz M. The development and validation of a simple snow model for the GISS GCM. J Clim 1994, 7:1842-1855.
69. Marks D., Dozier J. Climate and energy exchange at the snow surface in the alpine region of the Sierra Nevada. 2. Snow cover energy balance. Water Resour Res 1992, 28:3043-3054.
70. Marks D., Kimball J., Tingey D., Link T. The sensitivity of snowmelt processes to climate conditions and forest cover during rain-on-snow: a study of the 1996 Pacific Northwest flood. Hydrol Processes 1998, 12:1569-1587.
71. Marshall S., Oglesby R. An improved snow hydrology for GCMs. Part 1: snow cover fraction, albedo, grain size, and age. Clim Dyn 1994, 10:21-37.
72. Marshall S.E., Warren S.G. Parameterization of snow albedo for climate models. Large scale effects of seasonal snow cover 1987, 166. IAHS Publications. B.E. Goodison, R.G. Barry, J. Dozier (Eds.).
73. Martin E., Lejeune Y. Turbulent fluxes above the snow surface. Ann Glaciol 1998, 26:179-183.
74. Morin S, Lejeune Y, Lesaffre B, Panel JM, Poncet D, David P, et al. A 18-year long (1993-2011) snow and meteorological dataset from a mid-altitude mountain site (Col de Porte, France, 1325 m alt.) for driving and evaluating snowpack models. Earth Syst Sci Data 2012;4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-4-13-2012.
75. Mott R, Schirmer M, Bavay M, Grünewald T, Lehning M. Understanding snow-transport processes shaping the mountain snow-cover. The Cryosphere 2010;4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-545-2010.
76. Nijssen B., et al. Simulation of high latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2(e). 2: comparison of model results with observations. Global Planet Change 2003, 38:31-53.
77. Niu G.Y., Yang Z.L. An observation-based formulation of snow cover fraction and its evaluation over large North American river basins. J Geophys Res 2007, 112. 10.1029/2007JD008674.
78. Niu G.Y., et al. The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J Geophys Res 2011, 116. 10.1029/2010JD015139.
79. Oke T.R. Boundary layer climates 1987, Routledge.
80. Oleson KW, et al. Technical description of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-461+STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO., 2004.
81. Oleson KW, et al. Technical description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-478+STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO., 2010.
82. Paquet E., Laval M.T. Operation feedback and prospects of EDF Cosmic-Ray Snow Sensors. La Houille Blanche 2006, 2. 10.1051/lhb:200602015.
83. Pedersen C.A., Winther J.G. Intercomparison and validation of snow albedo parameterization schemes in climate models. Clim Dyn 2005, 25:351-362.
84. Pitman A.J., Xia Y., Leplastrier M., Henderson-Sellers A. The CHAmeleon Surface Model: description and use with the PILPS phase 2(e) forcing data. Global Planet Change 2003, 38:121-135.
85. Pomeroy J.W., Gray D.M., Brown T., Hedstrom N.R., Quinton W.L., Granger R.J., et al. The cold regions hydrological model: a platform for basing model structure on physical evidence. Hydrol Processes 2007, 19:2650-2667.
86. Randall D.A., et al. The greening of the Colorado State University general circulation model. J Clim 1996, 9:738-763.
87. Roebber P.J., Bruening S.L., Schultz D.M., Cortinas J.V. Improving snowfall forecasting by diagnosing snow density. Wea Forecasting 2002, 18:264-287.
88. Roesch A.H., Gilgen M., Wild M., Ohmura A. A new snow cover fraction parameterization for the ECHAM4 GCM. Clim Dyn 2001, 17:933-945.
89. Roesch A. Evaluation of surface albedo and snow cover in AR4 coupled climate models. J Geophys Res 2006, 111. 10.1029/2005JD006473.
90. Rutter N., et al. Evaluation of forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2). J Geophys Res 2009, 114. 10.1029/2008JD011063.
91. Schlosser C.A., et al. Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS Phase 2(d). Mon Wea Rev 2000, 128:301-321.
92. Sellers P.J., Randall D.A., Collatz G.J., Berry J.A., Field C.B., Dazlich D.A., et al. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. 1. Model formulation. J Clim 1996, 9:676-705.
93. Shmakin A.B. The updated version of SPONSOR land surface scheme: PILPS-influenced improvements. Global Planet Change 1998, 19:49-62.
94. Slater A.G., Pitman A.J., Desborough C.E. The validation of a snow parameterization designed for use in general circulation models. Int J Climatol 1998, 18:595-617.
95. Slater A.G., et al. The representation of snow in land surface schemes: results from PILPS 2(d). J Hydrometeorol 2001, 2:7-25.
96. Smirnova T.G., Brown J.M., Benjamin S.G., Kim D. Parameterization of cold-season processes in the MAPS land-surface scheme. J Geophys Res 2000, 105:4077-4086.
97. Strasser U., Etchevers P., Lejeune Y. Inter-comparison of two snow models with different complexity using data from an alpine site. Nordic Hydrol 2002, 33:15-26.
98. Sturm M., Holmgren J., Konig M., Morris K. The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow. J Glaciol 1997, 43:26-41.
99. Sun S., Jin J., Xue Y. A simple snow-atmosphere-soil transfer model. J Geophys Res 1999, 104:19587-19597.
100. Sun S., Xue Y. Implementing a new snow scheme in Simplified Simple Biosphere Model. Adv Atmos Sci 2001, 18:335-354.
101. Takata K., Emori S., Watanabe T. Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff. Global Planet Change 2003, 38:209-222.
102. Tolson B.A., Shoemaker C.A. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resour Res 2007, 43. 10.1029/2005WR004723.
103. Truffaut F. Jules et Jim. Les Films du Carrosse, 1962.
104. Verseghy D.L. CLASS - a Canadian land-surface scheme for GCMs. I. Soil model. Int J Climatol 1991, 11:111-133.
105. Vionnet V, Brun E, Morin S, Boone A, Faroux S, Le Moigne P, et al. The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7. Geosci Model Dev 2012;5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012.
106. Vrugt J.A., Gupta H.V., Bouten W., Sorooshian S. A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 2003, 39:1201-1214.
107. Wang Z., Zeng X. Evaluation of snow albedo in land models for weather and climate studies. J Appl Meteor Climatol 2010, 49:363-380.
108. Wiscombe W.J., Warren S.G. A model for the spectral albedo of snow. I: pure snow. J Atmos Sci 1980, 37:2712-2733.
109. Xue Y., Sellers P.J., Kinter J.L., Shukla J. A simplified biosphere model for global climate studies. J Clim 1991, 4:345-364.
110. Xue Y.K., Sun S.F., Kahan D.S., Jiao Y.J. Impact of parameterizations in snow physics and interface processes on the simulation of snow cover and runoff at several cold region sites. J Geophys Res 2003, 108. 10.1029/2002JD003174.
111. Yang Z.L., Dickinson R.E., Robock A., Vinnikov K.Y. Validation of the snow sub-model of the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme with Russian snow cover and meteorological observational data. J Clim 1997, 10:353-373.
112. Yang Z.L., Niu G.Y. The versatile integrator of surface and atmosphere processes. Part 1. Model description. Global Planet Change 2003, 38:175-189.
113. Yen YC. Review of thermal properties of snow, ice and sea ice. CRREL Report 81-10; US Army Core of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, 1981.
114. Zeng X., Zhao M., Dickinson R.E. Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamic algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using the TOGA COARE and TAO data. J Clim 1998, 11:2628-2644.
115. Lehning M, Bartelt PB, Brown RL, Fierz C, Satyawali P. A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss Avalanche Warning Services. Part III: Meteorological Boundary Conditions, Thin Layer Formation and Evaluation. Cold Reg Sci Technol 2002;35(3):169-184.
116. Winstral Adam, Marks Danny, Gurney Robert. Simulating wind-affected snow accumulations at catchment to basin scales. Adv Water Resour 2013;55:64-79.